AsylumCompass
Saved
English

This historical identity has not been confirmed. Records cannot be attributed to this person.

From FY2021 to FY2025, 147 of 196 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code ASG at Philadelphia were grants (75.00%) and 49 were denials (25.00%). In the same years, the court recorded 40.63% and the national figure was 37.33%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Philadelphia · PHI

Grants 147 · Denials 49 · N 196
95% interval: 68.50%–80.54%

Judge code ASG
75.00%N 196
Philadelphia
40.63%N 5,584
United States · all courts
37.33%N 367,995

Among comparable judge codes at this court

13 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2021–FY2025. Their recorded grant shares range from 9.89% to 75.00%; the median is 44.07%.
Record coverage
14 courts with recordsFY1990–FY2023 · 69 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · not on the official listing checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Philadelphia

0%25%50%75%100%FY2014FY2015FY2016FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY20230.00%48.62%51.47%84.38%70.89%75.29%60.59%54.29%69.23%56.89%50.42%36.43%30.22%38.41%55.99%51.34%37.13%46.12%47.28%
  • Judge code ASG
  • Philadelphia
  • United States · all courts
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Philadelphia · PHIExplore this court's full context
FY202375.29%Small sample85642165.17%–83.24%
FY202270.89%Small sample79562360.09%–79.75%
FY202184.38%Small sample3227568.25%–93.14%
FY202051.47%Small sample68353339.83%–62.95%
FY201948.62%109535639.45%–57.89%
FY20170.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20120.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20110.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20070.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20000.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Elizabeth · ELZExplore this court's full context
FY202050.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%
FY201975.00%Small sample43130.06%–95.44%
FY20180.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY2017100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
FY20020.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY199750.00%Small sample126625.38%–74.62%
FY199527.59%Small sample2982114.70%–45.72%
FY19940.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Newark · NEWExplore this court's full context
FY201950.00%Small sample63318.76%–81.24%
FY201837.04%Small sample54203425.42%–50.37%
FY201756.67%Small sample30171339.20%–72.62%
FY201670.00%Small sample3021952.12%–83.34%
FY201580.00%Small sample2520560.87%–91.14%
FY201479.55%Small sample4435965.50%–88.85%
FY201364.38%Small sample73472652.93%–74.40%
FY201248.33%Small sample60293136.18%–60.69%
FY201157.58%Small sample99574247.74%–66.85%
FY201078.05%123962769.95%–84.45%
FY200948.53%136667040.29%–56.85%
FY200849.69%159798042.01%–57.37%
FY200746.03%126586837.58%–54.72%
FY200657.45%141816049.19%–65.30%
FY200533.59%131448726.07%–42.04%
FY200429.68%1554610923.05%–37.29%
FY200336.84%1716310829.98%–44.29%
FY200239.72%141568532.02%–47.96%
FY200152.78%108575143.43%–61.94%
FY200041.32%121507132.95%–50.23%
FY199928.02%1825113122.00%–34.95%
FY199828.91%128379121.76%–37.28%
FY199732.03%128418724.57%–40.54%
FY199615.87%1262010610.52%–23.25%
FY199524.72%Small sample89226716.93%–34.60%
FY199430.00%Small sample70214920.54%–41.54%
FY199329.79%Small sample47143318.65%–43.98%
FY19910.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY19900.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
San Diego · SNDExplore this court's full context
FY2017100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
FY199233.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%
Pearsall · PSDExplore this court's full context
FY201450.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%
Harlingen · HLGExplore this court's full context
FY2009100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
FY19960.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY19927.14%Small sample141131.27%–31.47%
FY19910.00%Small sample606<0.01%–39.03%
FY19900.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Chicago · CHIExplore this court's full context
FY20090.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Orlando · ORLExplore this court's full context
FY20080.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY200750.00%Small sample42215.00%–85.00%
Adelanto · ADLExplore this court's full context
FY20080.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Boston · BOSExplore this court's full context
FY2005100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
FY200433.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%
Napanoch · ULSExplore this court's full context
FY19940.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Los Fresnos · PISExplore this court's full context
FY199333.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%
FY199245.95%Small sample37172031.04%–61.62%
FY199140.24%Small sample82334930.30%–51.06%
FY199044.19%Small sample43192430.43%–58.89%
New York - Varick · NYVExplore this court's full context
FY199366.67%Small sample64230.00%–90.32%
Miami · MIAExplore this court's full context
FY19920.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
FY199150.00%Small sample126625.38%–74.62%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationalityFY2021–FY2025 · pooledTotal (N)Court · same nationalityFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Philadelphia
Guatemala75.00%Small sample5228.02% · N 1,003——20 / 2413 / 216 / 7
Honduras55.56%Small sample2730.37% · N 596——3 / 89 / 163 / 3
Belarus91.67%Small sample1292.04% · N 226——5 / 61 / 15 / 5
India77.78%Small sample937.50% · N 144——1 / 34 / 42 / 2
Venezuela100.00%Small sample753.94% · N 165——3 / 34 / 4—
Angola100.00%Small sample6100.00% · N 16——6 / 6——
Bangladesh100.00%Small sample672.00% · N 50——2 / 22 / 22 / 2
Brazil0.00%Small sample68.06% · N 583——0 / 30 / 3—
El Salvador33.33%Small sample631.92% · N 260——2 / 20 / 20 / 2
Georgia66.67%Small sample669.23% · N 78——0 / 24 / 4—
Benin100.00%Small sample5100.00% · N 6——5 / 5——
Malaysia100.00%Small sample5100.00% · N 5——5 / 5——
Azerbaijan100.00%Small sample477.78% · N 18————4 / 4
Kazakhstan75.00%Small sample483.33% · N 24——1 / 21 / 11 / 1
Mexico50.00%Small sample415.54% · N 193——2 / 30 / 1—
Russia75.00%Small sample483.17% · N 309——2 / 20 / 11 / 1
Egypt100.00%Small sample347.62% · N 21———3 / 3—
Nicaragua100.00%Small sample343.18% · N 88———3 / 3—
Ukraine100.00%Small sample368.42% · N 38———3 / 3—
Algeria100.00%Small sample292.31% · N 13———2 / 2—
Cameroon100.00%Small sample267.39% · N 46——1 / 1—1 / 1
Ecuador0.00%Small sample212.67% · N 150——0 / 1—0 / 1
Kirghizia (Kyrgyzstan)50.00%Small sample260.95% · N 105———1 / 2—
Liberia100.00%Small sample250.00% · N 44———1 / 11 / 1
Uzbekistan100.00%Small sample255.78% · N 147———2 / 2—
Burma (Myanmar)100.00%Small sample150.00% · N 8——1 / 1——
Congo0.00%Small sample166.67% · N 6————0 / 1
Ghana100.00%Small sample173.17% · N 41———1 / 1—
Guinea100.00%Small sample140.00% · N 55——1 / 1——
Ivory Coast (Cote D'Ivoire)100.00%Small sample150.00% · N 12——1 / 1——
Jordan0.00%Small sample169.23% · N 13——0 / 1——
Mauritania100.00%Small sample131.82% · N 44——1 / 1——
Pakistan100.00%Small sample171.64% · N 67——1 / 1——
Togo100.00%Small sample188.89% · N 9———1 / 1—
Turkiye100.00%Small sample157.65% · N 85——1 / 1——
Uganda100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 4———1 / 1—
Vietnam100.00%Small sample160.00% · N 10————1 / 1

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Baltimore · BAL · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Baltimore · BAL

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Boston · BOS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Chicago · CHI

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Elizabeth · ELZ

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Harlingen · HLG

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Laredo · LRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Miami · MIA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Newark · NEW

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New Orleans · NOL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New York - Federal Plaza · NYC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New York - Varick · NYV

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Orlando · ORL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Philadelphia · PHI

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

San Diego · SND

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Sterling · STE

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Napanoch · ULS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

Denominator: respondent-filed BIA IJ Case Appeal events with an exact proceeding link and stored judge code, with a recorded disposition during the displayed period.

Respondent-filed recorded BIA appeal events during FY2021–FY2025
Appeal events (denominator)DIS · recorded dismissal/affirmanceREM · remand as recordedSUS · appeal sustained as recordedOther · mixed recorded dispositions
744314017

Small sample: N is below 100. Counts remain visible; a few events can change the pattern substantially.

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 196 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code ASG at Philadelphia in FY2021–FY2025, 147 were grants (75.00%) and 49 were denials (25.00%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 14 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

30,536Associated proceeding records
9,086Proceedings linked to asylum applications
9,067Eligible dated asylum records
3,369Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
23
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY1986
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2024
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 65 eligible asylum records have no application result; 65 of them appear in the dated list.
  • 4 asylum-linked proceedings are outside the included proceeding types.
  • 15 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

9,067 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

Not on the checked official listing

The checked listing does not establish why this name is absent or where this person works now.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Baltimore

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
43
Other schedule types
7
Reliable asylum association
21
No identifiable asylum association
22

Boston · BOS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
66
Other schedule types
66
Reliable asylum association
35
No identifiable asylum association
31

Chicago

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
39
Other schedule types
10
Reliable asylum association
4
No identifiable asylum association
35

Elizabeth

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
954
Other schedule types
654
Reliable asylum association
289
No identifiable asylum association
665

Harlingen

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
951
Other schedule types
920
Reliable asylum association
384
No identifiable asylum association
567

Laredo

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
19
Other schedule types
19
No identifiable asylum association
19

Miami · MIA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
320
Other schedule types
320
Reliable asylum association
91
No identifiable asylum association
229

Newark

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
86,467
Other schedule types
37,304
Reliable asylum association
33,615
No identifiable asylum association
52,805
Unlinked asylum records
47

New Orleans · NOL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1
Other schedule types
1
No identifiable asylum association
1

New York - Federal Plaza

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
12
Other schedule types
12
No identifiable asylum association
12

New York - Varick

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
58
Other schedule types
58
Reliable asylum association
38
No identifiable asylum association
20

Orlando

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
67
Other schedule types
48
Reliable asylum association
38
No identifiable asylum association
29

Philadelphia

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
32,020
Other schedule types
8
Reliable asylum association
17,837
No identifiable asylum association
14,182
Unlinked asylum records
1

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
8,823
Other schedule types
8,619
Reliable asylum association
4,139
No identifiable asylum association
4,684

Pearsall

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
138
Other schedule types
46
Reliable asylum association
18
No identifiable asylum association
120

San Diego

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
184
Other schedule types
113
Reliable asylum association
59
No identifiable asylum association
125

Sterling · STE

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
471
Reliable asylum association
212
No identifiable asylum association
259

Napanoch · ULS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
689
Other schedule types
673
Reliable asylum association
2
No identifiable asylum association
687
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: ASG · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY1986–FY2024

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Annie S. Garcy: historical immigration judge code records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/annie-s-garcy-asg Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge