AsylumCompass
Search
Saved
English
EnglishEspañol中文

This historical identity has not been confirmed. Records cannot be attributed to this person.

In FY2000, 5 of 5 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code ADP at Chicago were grants (100.00%) and 0 were denials (0.00%). That year, the court recorded 51.57%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Chicago · CHI

Grants 5 · Denials 0 · N 5
95% interval: 56.55%–100.00%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

Judge code ADP
100.00%N 5
Chicago
51.57%N 700
United States · all courts
No national figure is published for this period

Among comparable judge codes at this court

This figure has fewer than 100 grant-or-denial records, so it is not placed among comparable judge codes.

Record coverage
6 courts with recordsFY1973–FY2000 · 41 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · not on the official listing checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Chicago

0%25%50%75%100%FY1991FY1992FY1993FY1994FY1995FY1996FY1997FY1998FY1999FY200015.15%11.76%11.63%6.25%6.02%29.55%21.54%38.64%44.00%100.00%19.28%21.14%20.38%20.57%23.84%38.23%45.53%48.21%33.96%51.57%
  • Judge code ADP
  • Chicago
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Chicago · CHIExplore this court's full context
FY2000100.00%Small sample55056.55%–100.00%
FY199944.00%Small sample25111426.67%–62.93%
FY199838.64%Small sample44172725.72%–53.38%
FY199721.54%Small sample65145113.29%–32.97%
FY199629.55%Small sample88266221.03%–39.77%
FY19956.02%Small sample835782.60%–13.34%
FY19946.25%Small sample644602.46%–15.00%
FY199311.63%Small sample435385.07%–24.48%
FY199211.76%Small sample172153.29%–34.34%
FY199115.15%Small sample335286.65%–30.92%
FY19904.94%Small sample814771.94%–12.02%
FY198931.37%Small sample51163520.33%–45.03%
FY198864.52%Small sample62402252.08%–75.26%
FY198752.31%Small sample65343140.38%–63.98%
FY198621.43%Small sample2862210.21%–39.54%
FY19850.00%Small sample14014<0.01%–21.53%
FY19840.00%Small sample4040.00%–48.99%
FY19830.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19730.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Detroit · DETExplore this court's full context
FY199835.71%Small sample145916.34%–61.24%
FY199728.57%Small sample7258.22%–64.11%
FY199510.53%Small sample192172.94%–31.39%
FY19943.33%Small sample301290.59%–16.67%
FY199320.00%Small sample306249.51%–37.31%
FY19925.88%Small sample684642.31%–14.17%
FY199111.11%Small sample546485.19%–22.19%
FY199014.52%Small sample629537.83%–25.34%
FY198914.29%Small sample213184.98%–34.64%
FY19880.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19860.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY19850.00%Small sample190190.00%–16.82%
FY19840.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19830.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY19820.00%Small sample4040.00%–48.99%
FY19810.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY19800.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Omaha · OMAExplore this court's full context
FY19970.00%Small sample110110.00%–25.88%
Baltimore · BALExplore this court's full context
FY19900.00%Small sample130130.00%–22.81%
Annandale · WASExplore this court's full context
FY19890.00%Small sample14014<0.01%–21.53%
FY19880.00%Small sample707<0.01%–35.43%
Boston · BOSExplore this court's full context
FY19897.69%Small sample131121.37%–33.31%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Baltimore · BAL · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Baltimore · BAL

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Fort Snelling · BLM

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Boston · BOS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Chicago · CHI

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Detroit · DET

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Kansas City · KAN

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Newark · NEW

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New York - Federal Plaza · NYC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Omaha · OMA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Annandale · WAS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Filters update automatically. Court counts cover all dates; result counts follow the selected court and dates.

Results for the current selection

Change filters

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

No qualifying respondent-filed BIA appeal events are recorded for this judge code in the displayed population and period. This does not establish no service or no decisions.

About these records

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 5 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code ADP at Chicago in FY2000, 5 were grants (100.00%) and 0 were denials (0.00%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 6 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Find qualified legal help

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

13,238Associated proceeding records
1,786Proceedings linked to asylum applications
1,786Eligible dated asylum records
1,171Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
8
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY1973
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2000
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 42 eligible asylum records have no application result; 42 of them appear in the dated list.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

1,786 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Coverage countsSource files and checks

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

Not on the checked official listing

The checked listing does not establish why this name is absent or where this person works now.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Baltimore

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
35
Other schedule types
34
Reliable asylum association
32
No identifiable asylum association
3

Fort Snelling

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
3
Other schedule types
3
No identifiable asylum association
3

Boston · BOS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
66
Other schedule types
66
Reliable asylum association
39
No identifiable asylum association
27

Chicago

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
16,272
Other schedule types
16,175
Reliable asylum association
3,978
No identifiable asylum association
12,294

Detroit

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
9,487
Other schedule types
9,451
Reliable asylum association
1,733
No identifiable asylum association
7,746
Unlinked asylum records
8

Kansas City

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
18
Other schedule types
18
No identifiable asylum association
18

Newark

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
290
Other schedule types
285
Reliable asylum association
3
No identifiable asylum association
287

New York - Federal Plaza

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
2
Other schedule types
2
No identifiable asylum association
2

Omaha

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
67
Other schedule types
65
Reliable asylum association
35
No identifiable asylum association
32

Annandale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
67
Other schedule types
39
Reliable asylum association
62
No identifiable asylum association
5
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks
Source files and checks · Attribution details

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: ADP · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Download certified judge-code BIA aggregates · Companion manifest · Read disclosure certificate · Methods

By historical court and periodBIA appeal outcomes by yearData package changes

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY1973–FY2000

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Official FOIA libraryOriginal CASE ZIP · about 4.55 GBEOIR code keyEdition details and fingerprint

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Anthony D., JR. Petrone: historical immigration judge code records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/anthony-d-jr-petrone-adp Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge