AsylumCompass
Saved
English

From FY2021 to FY2025, 79 of 597 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code CPH at Houston – Greenspoint Park were grants (13.23%) and 518 were denials (86.77%). In the same years, the court recorded 7.62% and the national figure was 37.33%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Houston – Greenspoint Park · HGP

Grants 79 · Denials 518 · N 597
95% interval: 10.75%–16.19%

Judge code CPH
13.23%N 597
Houston – Greenspoint Park
7.62%N 9,739
United States · all courts
37.33%N 367,995

Among comparable judge codes at this court

21 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2021–FY2025. Their recorded grant shares range from 0.00% to 14.29%; the median is 7.31%.
FY2026 so far
1.41%71 records through 2026-08-31 · court: 0.90%
Record coverage
11 courts with recordsFY2020–FY2026 · 20 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Hearing dates on calendar
143 master · 962 individualHouston – Greenspoint Park · proceedings with hearing dates, 2026-09–2029-08Hearing schedule
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · official listing: Houston – Greenspoint Park, checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Houston – Greenspoint Park

0%10%20%30%40%50%FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY202624.29%15.44%16.19%8.39%1.41%10.28%12.98%8.76%3.23%0.90%46.12%47.28%43.52%23.13%
  • Judge code CPH
  • Houston – Greenspoint Park
  • United States · all courts
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Houston – Greenspoint Park · HGPExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year1.41%Small sample711700.25%–7.56%
FY20258.39%286242625.70%–12.18%
FY202416.19%105178810.36%–24.41%
FY202315.44%1362111510.33%–22.45%
FY202224.29%Small sample70175315.75%–35.50%
Oakdale · OAKExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year3.03%Small sample331320.54%–15.32%
FY20258.82%Small sample343313.05%–22.96%
LaSalle · JNAExplore this court's full context
FY20255.26%Small sample191180.94%–24.64%
Houston – S. Gessner Road · HSGExplore this court's full context
FY20250.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY2022100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
FY20210.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
New Orleans · NOLExplore this court's full context
FY20250.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
San Francisco · SFRExplore this court's full context
FY20240.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20207.84%Small sample514473.09%–18.50%
San Antonio · SNAExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Sacramento · SMOExplore this court's full context
FY202136.25%Small sample80295126.57%–47.19%
Houston - Jefferson Street Immigration Court · HOUExplore this court's full context
FY2021100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
FY20200.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Tacoma · TACExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
Sterling · STEExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationalityFY2021–FY2025 · pooledTotal (N)Court · same nationalityFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Houston – Greenspoint Park
Honduras2.27%1762.59% · N 2,7844 / 720 / 350 / 370 / 32—
El Salvador0.90%1112.64% · N 1,4400 / 260 / 241 / 470 / 14—
Mexico0.00%Small sample761.66% · N 1,1440 / 590 / 70 / 70 / 3—
Venezuela56.25%Small sample4821.75% · N 1,1683 / 220 / 113 / 1411 / 11—
Colombia0.00%Small sample333.14% · N 5740 / 220 / 90 / 2——
Nicaragua53.33%Small sample3010.34% · N 7062 / 156 / 73 / 35 / 5—
Cuba68.97%Small sample2916.97% · N 7789 / 167 / 94 / 4——
Guatemala0.00%Small sample270.58% · N 5130 / 120 / 20 / 90 / 4—
Russia38.46%Small sample1323.68% · N 381 / 94 / 4———
Pakistan0.00%Small sample1018.18% · N 220 / 3—0 / 7——
China12.50%Small sample819.23% · N 521 / 7—0 / 1——
India25.00%Small sample434.48% · N 291 / 4————
Peru0.00%Small sample42.53% · N 790 / 10 / 3———
Syria0.00%Small sample452.63% · N 19——0 / 4——
Ecuador0.00%Small sample31.15% · N 870 / 3————
Senegal0.00%Small sample30.00% · N 200 / 20 / 1———
Unknown Nationality0.00%Small sample30.00% · N 50 / 3————
Belarus0.00%Small sample216.67% · N 60 / 2————
Iraq100.00%Small sample286.67% · N 302 / 2————
Belize0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 70 / 1————
Costa Rica0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 20 / 1————
Georgia0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 20 / 1————
Guinea0.00%Small sample133.33% · N 60 / 1————
Iran100.00%Small sample185.71% · N 71 / 1————
Italy0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1—0 / 1———
Jordan0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 4——0 / 1——
Romania0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 5—0 / 1———
Turkiye0.00%Small sample137.50% · N 16—0 / 1———
Ukraine100.00%Small sample125.00% · N 4———1 / 1—
Vietnam0.00%Small sample128.57% · N 70 / 1————
Sacramento · SMO
Mexico0.00%Small sample2126.45% · N 484————0 / 21
Guatemala16.67%Small sample1837.50% · N 256————3 / 18
Russia100.00%Small sample1293.74% · N 1,998————12 / 12
El Salvador0.00%Small sample1139.52% · N 248————0 / 11
India87.50%Small sample874.04% · N 759————7 / 8
Honduras0.00%Small sample344.37% · N 151————0 / 3
Iraq100.00%Small sample358.97% · N 39————3 / 3
Romania100.00%Small sample364.52% · N 62————3 / 3
China100.00%Small sample171.88% · N 32————1 / 1
Oakdale
Russia30.00%Small sample1037.87% · N 3673 / 10————
Georgia0.00%Small sample55.88% · N 1700 / 5————
Cameroon0.00%Small sample237.89% · N 950 / 2————
China0.00%Small sample24.44% · N 900 / 2————
Guatemala0.00%Small sample23.26% · N 920 / 2————
India0.00%Small sample22.96% · N 1350 / 2————
Afghanistan0.00%Small sample134.48% · N 580 / 1————
Azerbaijan0.00%Small sample125.00% · N 80 / 1————
Bolivia0.00%Small sample125.00% · N 160 / 1————
El Salvador0.00%Small sample15.26% · N 760 / 1————
Ethiopia0.00%Small sample113.79% · N 290 / 1————
Honduras0.00%Small sample11.63% · N 1230 / 1————
Iran0.00%Small sample116.67% · N 300 / 1————
Morocco0.00%Small sample110.00% · N 100 / 1————
Senegal0.00%Small sample15.77% · N 520 / 1————
Uzbekistan0.00%Small sample14.48% · N 1340 / 1————
Vietnam0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 250 / 1————
LaSalle
Afghanistan33.33%Small sample334.38% · N 961 / 3————
China0.00%Small sample311.58% · N 1900 / 3————
Bangladesh0.00%Small sample20.00% · N 640 / 2————
Ethiopia0.00%Small sample27.81% · N 640 / 2————
Vietnam0.00%Small sample213.73% · N 510 / 2————
Armenia0.00%Small sample117.39% · N 460 / 1————
Cameroon0.00%Small sample146.28% · N 1210 / 1————
Egypt0.00%Small sample113.24% · N 680 / 1————
Haiti0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 270 / 1————
Honduras0.00%Small sample14.81% · N 1870 / 1————
Jordan0.00%Small sample17.41% · N 270 / 1————
Turkiye0.00%Small sample117.46% · N 1260 / 1————
Houston – S. Gessner Road
Nicaragua50.00%Small sample25.19% · N 3660 / 1——1 / 1—
Honduras0.00%Small sample12.60% · N 1,076————0 / 1
New Orleans · NOL
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample366.81% · N 7140 / 3————
Houston - Jefferson Street Immigration Court
Nicaragua100.00%Small sample122.97% · N 370————1 / 1
San Francisco · SFR
Mexico0.00%Small sample160.17% · N 2,679—0 / 1———
San Antonio
El Salvador0.00%Small sample123.70% · N 270——0 / 1——

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Houston – Greenspoint Park · HGP · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Same count scale for both hearing types. Browse horizontally to see all 36 months.

Proceedings

Master Calendar Hearings

Individual / Merits Hearings

Months with no retained records show 0.

Monthly counts are available for all recorded courts below.

Houston – Greenspoint Park · HGP

Monthly counts

Christopher Phan · CPH · Houston – Greenspoint Park · HGP · 2026-09–2029-08 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-08 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-0914326215
2026-10019014
2026-11027015
2026-12036029
2027-01067058
2027-02090083
2027-03088059
2027-04077060
2027-05068042
2027-06087069
2027-07045038
2027-08053046
2027-09056051
2027-10051048
2027-11034029
2027-12027024
2028-01048040
2028-02040031
2028-03023023
2028-040000
2028-050000
2028-060000
2028-070000
2028-080000
2028-090000
2028-100000
2028-110000
2028-120000
2029-010000
2029-020000
2029-030000
2029-040000
2029-050000
2029-060000
2029-070000
2029-080000

Retained: 1,105Excluded: 600Unable to confirm: 4Source files and checks

LaSalle · JNA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Laredo · LRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New Orleans · NOL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Oakdale · OAK

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

San Francisco · SFR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Sacramento · SMO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Tacoma · TAC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

Denominator: respondent-filed BIA IJ Case Appeal events with an exact proceeding link and stored judge code, with a recorded disposition during the displayed period.

Respondent-filed recorded BIA appeal events during FY2021–FY2025
Appeal events (denominator)DIS · recorded dismissal/affirmanceREM · remand as recordedSUS · appeal sustained as recordedOther · mixed recorded dispositions
57282027

Small sample: N is below 100. Counts remain visible; a few events can change the pattern substantially.

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 597 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code CPH at Houston – Greenspoint Park in FY2021–FY2025, 79 were grants (13.23%) and 518 were denials (86.77%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 11 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

Why is FY2026 marked as a partial year?

Fiscal year 2026 runs from 2025-10-01 to 2026-09-30, and the source data end on 2026-08-31. FY2026 figures cover only part of the year, so they are not compared with complete years.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Where does this judge hear cases now?

EOIR’s official hearing directory, checked 2026-09-16, lists this name at Houston – Greenspoint Park.

Under this judge code, the 2026-08 EOIR edition records hearing dates from 2026-09 to 2029-08 at Houston – Greenspoint Park: 143 master and 962 individual proceedings.

A listing or a scheduled date does not establish a sole duty station.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

6,929Associated proceeding records
2,998Proceedings linked to asylum applications
2,215Eligible dated asylum records
900Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
17
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY2018
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2026 · Partial year
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 782 eligible asylum records have no completion date.
  • 879 eligible asylum records have no application result; 105 of them appear in the dated list. 774 records lack both a usable completion date and an application result. The missing-date and missing-result counts overlap.
  • 1 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

2,997 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

On the checked official listing

An official listing may include supervisory or multiple-court assignments; it does not establish a sole duty station.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Houston – Greenspoint Park

Retained: 1,105Excluded: 600Unable to confirm: 4

Raw Master and Individual records
1,709
Unconfirmed proportion
0.23%
Recorded handling reason
600
Multiple future records without a handling reason
4
Historical schedule records
10,292
Future schedule records
1,717
Other schedule types
641
Reliable asylum association
6,853
No identifiable asylum association
5,155
Unlinked asylum records
1

LaSalle

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
141
Other schedule types
10
Reliable asylum association
132
No identifiable asylum association
9

Laredo

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
79
Other schedule types
79
No identifiable asylum association
79

New Orleans · NOL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
3
Reliable asylum association
3

Oakdale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
2,308
Other schedule types
207
Reliable asylum association
336
No identifiable asylum association
1,972

San Francisco · SFR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
4,611
Reliable asylum association
3,370
No identifiable asylum association
1,241

Sacramento · SMO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
460
Reliable asylum association
204
No identifiable asylum association
256

Tacoma

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
45
Other schedule types
15
Reliable asylum association
19
No identifiable asylum association
26
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: CPH · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY2018–FY2026 · Partial year: FY2026

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Judge Christopher Phan · Houston – Greenspoint Park Immigration Court asylum records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/christopher-phan-cph Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge