Dayna Beamer — Historical EOIR code records

This historical identity has not been confirmed. Records cannot be attributed to this person.

In FY2019, 88 of 220 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code DMB at Honolulu were grants (40.00%) and 132 were denials (60.00%). That year, the court recorded 41.32%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Honolulu · HON

Period

40.00%Grants 88 · Denials 132 · N 220
95% interval: 33.75%–46.59%

Judge code DMB: 40.00%N 220
Honolulu: 41.32%N 363; No court figure for this period
United States · all courts: No national figure is published for this period

Among comparable judge codes at this court

Fewer than 5 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2019, so no comparison among judge codes is drawn.

Record coverage: 8 courts with recordsFY1995–FY2020 · 56 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Data through: 2026-08-31EOIR records · not on the official listing checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Honolulu

Judge code DMB
Honolulu

National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.

Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FY	Recorded grant share	Total (N)	Grant records	Denial records	95% interval
Honolulu · HON Explore this court's full context
FY2020	46.03%Small sample	63	29	34	34.31%–58.21%
FY2019	40.00%	220	88	132	33.75%–46.59%
FY2018	43.52%	216	94	122	37.08%–50.19%
FY2017	75.88%	199	151	48	69.48%–81.30%
FY2016	81.95%	205	168	37	76.11%–86.61%
FY2015	87.14%	140	122	18	80.59%–91.71%
FY2014	81.25%Small sample	32	26	6	64.69%–91.11%
FY2013	71.43%Small sample	35	25	10	54.95%–83.67%
FY2012	59.15%Small sample	71	42	29	47.54%–69.83%
FY2011	52.50%	120	63	57	43.63%–61.22%
FY2010	50.59%Small sample	85	43	42	40.17%–60.96%
FY2009	76.81%	138	106	32	69.10%–83.07%
FY2008	85.31%	143	122	21	78.59%–90.19%
FY2007	81.71%Small sample	82	67	15	71.99%–88.59%
FY2006	89.47%Small sample	57	51	6	78.88%–95.09%
FY2005	65.63%Small sample	64	42	22	53.40%–76.08%
FY2004	69.44%Small sample	72	50	22	58.05%–78.87%
FY2003	44.23%Small sample	52	23	29	31.60%–57.66%
FY2002	60.00%Small sample	60	36	24	47.37%–71.43%
FY2001	78.38%Small sample	37	29	8	62.80%–88.61%
FY2000	61.90%Small sample	21	13	8	40.88%–79.25%
FY1999	36.36%Small sample	33	12	21	22.19%–53.38%
FY1998	20.00%Small sample	10	2	8	5.67%–50.98%
FY1997	100.00%Small sample	1	1	0	20.65%–100.00%
FY1995	0.00%Small sample	1	0	1	0.00%–79.35%
Hagatna · AGA Explore this court's full context
FY2020	25.00%Small sample	4	1	3	4.56%–69.94%
FY2019	62.50%Small sample	32	20	12	45.25%–77.07%
FY2018	44.44%Small sample	9	4	5	18.88%–73.33%
FY2017	25.00%Small sample	4	1	3	4.56%–69.94%
FY2015	41.67%Small sample	12	5	7	19.33%–68.05%
FY2014	62.50%Small sample	16	10	6	38.64%–81.52%
FY2013	51.16%Small sample	43	22	21	36.75%–65.38%
FY2012	48.39%Small sample	31	15	16	31.97%–65.16%
FY2011	40.00%Small sample	15	6	9	19.82%–64.25%
FY2010	57.69%Small sample	26	15	11	38.95%–74.46%
FY2009	52.17%Small sample	23	12	11	32.96%–70.76%
FY2008	81.48%Small sample	27	22	5	63.30%–91.82%
FY2007	63.16%Small sample	19	12	7	41.04%–80.85%
FY2006	62.50%Small sample	48	30	18	48.36%–74.78%
FY2005	74.65%Small sample	71	53	18	63.45%–83.32%
FY2004	63.64%Small sample	44	28	16	48.87%–76.22%
FY2003	48.39%Small sample	62	30	32	36.41%–60.55%
FY2002	66.99%	103	69	34	57.44%–75.32%
FY2001	80.68%Small sample	88	71	17	71.22%–87.57%
FY2000	52.05%Small sample	73	38	35	40.78%–63.12%
FY1999	20.00%Small sample	55	11	44	11.55%–32.36%
FY1998	33.33%Small sample	18	6	12	16.28%–56.25%
FY1997	33.33%Small sample	3	1	2	6.15%–79.23%
West Los Angeles Immigration Court · WLA Explore this court's full context
FY2007	0.00%Small sample	2	0	2	0.00%–65.76%
FY2006	75.00%Small sample	4	3	1	30.06%–95.44%
FY2005	25.00%Small sample	12	3	9	8.89%–53.23%
Dallas · DAL Explore this court's full context
FY2007	57.14%Small sample	7	4	3	25.05%–84.18%
Florence · FLO Explore this court's full context
FY2006	0.00%Small sample	1	0	1	0.00%–79.35%
Newark · NEW Explore this court's full context
FY2006	100.00%Small sample	1	1	0	20.65%–100.00%
Detroit · DET Explore this court's full context
FY2004	25.00%Small sample	8	2	6	7.15%–59.07%
San Francisco · SFR Explore this court's full context
FY2003	62.50%Small sample	8	5	3	30.57%–86.32%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Adelanto · ADL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Hagatna · AGA

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Concord · CCC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dallas · DAL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Detroit · DET

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Florence · FLO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Honolulu · HON

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Imperial · IMP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Newark · NEW

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Otay Mesa · OTM

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Saipan · SAI

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

San Francisco · SFR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

San Antonio · SNA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

San Diego · SND

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

West Los Angeles Immigration Court · WLA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Historical record court

Saved application result

Completion fiscal year

Completed on or after

Completed on or before

Results for the current selection

Change filters

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Granted
Denied
Recorded as abandoned
Recorded as withdrawn
Recorded as not adjudicated
Recorded as administratively closed
Other recorded categories
No application result recorded

Bar length shows total records, not grant share. Inspect a month to see every result category. Use arrow keys to explore values; Home and End jump to the first and last.

Exact monthly record counts
Calendar month	Granted	Denied	Recorded as abandoned	Recorded as withdrawn	Recorded as not adjudicated	Recorded as administratively closed	Other recorded categories	No application result recorded	Total records	Grant or denial results (N)	Recorded grant share

Grant share = grants ÷ (grants + denials). Other categories are excluded; a zero denominator is not calculable.

Empty months mean no eligible source rows in this selection, not verified inactivity.

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record court	Fiscal year	Granted	Denied	Recorded as abandoned	Recorded as withdrawn	Recorded as not adjudicated	Recorded as administratively closed	Other recorded categories	No application result recorded	Total records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion date	Historical record court	Saved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

Denominator: respondent-filed BIA IJ Case Appeal events with an exact proceeding link and stored judge code, with a recorded disposition during the displayed period.

Respondent-filed recorded BIA appeal events during FY2021–FY2025
Appeal events (denominator)	DIS · recorded dismissal/affirmance	REM · remand as recorded	SUS · appeal sustained as recorded	Other · mixed recorded dispositions
156	115	34	0	7

About these records

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 220 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code DMB at Honolulu in FY2019, 88 were grants (40.00%) and 132 were denials (60.00%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 8 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Find qualified legal help

Data and sources

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

13,441Associated proceeding records

4,321Proceedings linked to asylum applications

4,316Eligible dated asylum records

3,026Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts: 11
Earliest recorded completion FY: FY1995
Latest recorded completion FY: FY2021

Why some source records are outside the dated results

6 eligible asylum records have no application result; 6 of them appear in the dated list.
2 asylum-linked proceedings are outside the included proceeding types.
3 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

4,316 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Coverage counts Source files and checks

Official court listing

Directory checked: 2026-09-16EOIR hearing directory

Not on the checked official listing

The checked listing does not establish why this name is absent or where this person works now.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.