AsylumCompass
Saved
English

This historical identity has not been confirmed. Records cannot be attributed to this person.

From FY2021 to FY2025, 242 of 381 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code ERT at Denver were grants (63.52%) and 139 were denials (36.48%). In the same years, the court recorded 35.93% and the national figure was 37.33%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Denver · DEN

Grants 242 · Denials 139 · N 381
95% interval: 58.57%–68.19%

Judge code ERT
63.52%N 381
Denver
35.93%N 5,085
United States · all courts
37.33%N 367,995

Among comparable judge codes at this court

12 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2021–FY2025. Their recorded grant shares range from 11.37% to 63.52%; the median is 32.04%.
Record coverage
9 courts with recordsFY1996–FY2024 · 29 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · not on the official listing checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Denver

0%25%50%75%100%FY2015FY2016FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY202494.29%58.65%62.90%21.05%29.27%30.71%25.00%52.70%60.00%81.25%65.00%59.26%51.68%22.31%16.57%21.68%43.81%45.48%50.18%36.55%37.13%46.12%47.28%43.52%
  • Judge code ERT
  • Denver
  • United States · all courts
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Denver · DENExplore this court's full context
FY202481.25%1281042473.62%–87.06%
FY202360.00%155936252.14%–67.38%
FY202252.70%Small sample74393541.48%–63.66%
FY202125.00%Small sample2461812.00%–44.90%
FY202030.71%127398823.35%–39.20%
FY201929.27%123368721.95%–37.84%
FY201821.05%Small sample194158.51%–43.33%
FY201762.90%Small sample62392350.46%–73.84%
FY201658.65%104614349.05%–67.65%
FY201594.29%Small sample3533281.39%–98.42%
FY201467.86%Small sample2819949.34%–82.07%
FY201331.25%Small sample1651114.16%–55.60%
FY201220.00%Small sample5143.62%–62.45%
FY201177.78%Small sample97245.26%–93.68%
FY20100.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19960.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Dallas · DALExplore this court's full context
FY2023100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
San Antonio · SNAExplore this court's full context
FY2023100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
Otero · OTOExplore this court's full context
FY202150.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%
FY201966.67%Small sample96335.42%–87.94%
FY201865.85%Small sample41271450.55%–78.44%
FY201750.00%Small sample126625.38%–74.62%
Aurora · AURExplore this court's full context
FY20190.00%Small sample4040.00%–48.99%
FY2015100.00%Small sample33043.85%–100.00%
FY201420.00%Small sample5143.62%–62.45%
Pearsall · PSDExplore this court's full context
FY201575.00%Small sample43130.06%–95.44%
Los Fresnos · PISExplore this court's full context
FY20150.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Tacoma · TACExplore this court's full context
FY20120.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
San Francisco · SFRExplore this court's full context
FY2012100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationalityFY2021–FY2025 · pooledTotal (N)Court · same nationalityFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Denver
Colombia76.67%Small sample9022.14% · N 1,486—45 / 5524 / 35——
El Salvador47.83%Small sample4635.85% · N 371—4 / 48 / 217 / 173 / 4
Guatemala35.56%Small sample4529.39% · N 347—4 / 58 / 154 / 150 / 10
Russia100.00%Small sample4485.93% · N 135—27 / 2712 / 125 / 5—
Honduras32.26%Small sample3128.06% · N 392—1 / 19 / 200 / 60 / 4
Peru30.77%Small sample2621.45% · N 359—7 / 110 / 14—1 / 1
Venezuela68.75%Small sample1655.06% · N 405—1 / 46 / 64 / 6—
Mexico69.23%Small sample1314.11% · N 638—6 / 8—1 / 12 / 4
Ecuador33.33%Small sample97.89% · N 38—0 / 1—3 / 8—
Ukraine100.00%Small sample7100.00% · N 12——4 / 43 / 3—
Belarus100.00%Small sample6100.00% · N 15—4 / 42 / 2——
Egypt100.00%Small sample676.92% · N 13——6 / 6——
Cuba80.00%Small sample552.17% · N 23—0 / 12 / 22 / 2—
Nicaragua100.00%Small sample565.34% · N 176——3 / 32 / 2—
Nepal75.00%Small sample484.21% · N 19——2 / 21 / 10 / 1
Turkiye75.00%Small sample458.82% · N 34—0 / 13 / 3——
Ethiopia100.00%Small sample375.47% · N 53—2 / 21 / 1——
Romania0.00%Small sample344.74% · N 38——0 / 3——
Cameroon100.00%Small sample292.86% · N 28—1 / 1—1 / 1—
Chile50.00%Small sample280.00% · N 5———1 / 2—
China100.00%Small sample270.59% · N 34———2 / 2—
Haiti0.00%Small sample275.00% · N 12——0 / 2——
Algeria100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 1———1 / 1—
Cocos Island0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1—0 / 1———
Democratic Republic Of Congo100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 12——1 / 1——
Guinea100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 3——1 / 1——
India100.00%Small sample160.00% · N 55—1 / 1———
Mali100.00%Small sample187.50% · N 8———1 / 1—
Saudi Arabia100.00%Small sample194.44% · N 18——1 / 1——
Tajikistan (Tadzhik)0.00%Small sample180.00% · N 10——0 / 1——
Togo100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 6———1 / 1—
Zimbabwe100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 1—1 / 1———
Otero
Democratic Republic Of Congo0.00%Small sample133.33% · N 3————0 / 1
Honduras100.00%Small sample14.62% · N 65————1 / 1
Dallas
Russia100.00%Small sample179.49% · N 39——1 / 1——
San Antonio
Colombia100.00%Small sample19.90% · N 313——1 / 1——

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Aurora · AUR · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Aurora · AUR

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Denver · DEN

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

El Paso SPC · EPD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Imperial · IMP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Otero · OTO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

San Francisco · SFR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Tacoma · TAC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

Denominator: respondent-filed BIA IJ Case Appeal events with an exact proceeding link and stored judge code, with a recorded disposition during the displayed period.

Respondent-filed recorded BIA appeal events during FY2021–FY2025
Appeal events (denominator)DIS · recorded dismissal/affirmanceREM · remand as recordedSUS · appeal sustained as recordedOther · mixed recorded dispositions
20210434064

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 381 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code ERT at Denver in FY2021–FY2025, 242 were grants (63.52%) and 139 were denials (36.48%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 9 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

11,850Associated proceeding records
2,566Proceedings linked to asylum applications
2,556Eligible dated asylum records
999Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
18
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY1993
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2025
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 2 eligible asylum records have no completion date.
  • 118 eligible asylum records have no application result; 116 of them appear in the dated list. 2 records lack both a usable completion date and an application result. The missing-date and missing-result counts overlap.
  • 8 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

2,558 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

Not on the checked official listing

The checked listing does not establish why this name is absent or where this person works now.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Aurora

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,590
Other schedule types
419
Reliable asylum association
216
No identifiable asylum association
1,374

Denver

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
61,184
Other schedule types
861
Reliable asylum association
26,960
No identifiable asylum association
34,224

El Paso SPC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
460
Other schedule types
129
Reliable asylum association
131
No identifiable asylum association
329

Imperial

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
23
Other schedule types
9
Reliable asylum association
3
No identifiable asylum association
20

Otero

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,030
Other schedule types
196
Reliable asylum association
648
No identifiable asylum association
382

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
10
Reliable asylum association
4
No identifiable asylum association
6

Pearsall

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
2,251
Other schedule types
912
Reliable asylum association
134
No identifiable asylum association
2,117

San Francisco · SFR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
65
Other schedule types
36
Reliable asylum association
11
No identifiable asylum association
54

Tacoma

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
138
Reliable asylum association
29
No identifiable asylum association
109
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: ERT · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY1993–FY2025

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Eileen R. Trujillo: historical immigration judge code records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/eileen-r-trujillo-ert Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge