Eliza Klein — Historical EOIR code records

This historical identity has not been confirmed. Records cannot be attributed to this person.

From FY2021 to FY2025, 83 of 105 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code EKN at Chicago were grants (79.05%) and 22 were denials (20.95%). In the same years, the court recorded 51.24% and the national figure was 37.33%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Chicago · CHI

Period

79.05%Grants 83 · Denials 22 · N 105
95% interval: 70.31%–85.74%

Judge code EKN: 79.05%N 105
Chicago: 51.24%N 10,725; No court figure for this period
United States · all courts: 37.33%N 367,995; No national figure is published for this period

Among comparable judge codes at this court

24 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2021–FY2025. Their recorded grant shares range from 12.07% to 81.48%; the median is 51.30%.

Compare judges at this court

Record coverage: 10 courts with recordsFY1985–FY2023 · 47 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Data through: 2026-08-31EOIR records · not on the official listing checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Chicago

Judge code EKN
Chicago
United States · all courts

National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.

Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FY	Recorded grant share	Total (N)	Grant records	Denial records	95% interval
Chicago · CHI Explore this court's full context
FY2023	68.97%Small sample	29	20	9	50.77%–82.72%
FY2022	83.33%Small sample	60	50	10	71.97%–90.69%
FY2021	81.25%Small sample	16	13	3	56.99%–93.41%
FY2020	64.38%Small sample	73	47	26	52.93%–74.40%
FY2019	50.00%Small sample	36	18	18	34.47%–65.53%
FY2015	16.67%Small sample	12	2	10	4.70%–44.80%
FY2014	0.00%Small sample	15	0	15	0.00%–20.39%
FY2013	17.65%Small sample	34	6	28	8.35%–33.51%
FY2012	3.57%Small sample	28	1	27	0.63%–17.71%
FY2011	16.67%Small sample	6	1	5	3.01%–56.35%
FY2009	0.00%Small sample	1	0	1	0.00%–79.35%
FY2007	0.00%Small sample	1	0	1	0.00%–79.35%
Boston · BOS Explore this court's full context
FY2013	0.00%Small sample	1	0	1	0.00%–79.35%
FY2012	0.00%Small sample	4	0	4	0.00%–48.99%
FY2011	66.67%	102	68	34	57.06%–75.06%
FY2010	43.65%	126	55	71	35.31%–52.37%
FY2009	48.00%	100	48	52	38.46%–57.68%
FY2008	45.45%	121	55	66	36.86%–54.33%
FY2007	50.34%	145	73	72	42.30%–58.37%
FY2006	39.76%	166	66	100	32.63%–47.35%
FY2005	34.25%	181	62	119	27.73%–41.43%
FY2004	47.59%	166	79	87	40.13%–55.16%
FY2003	39.36%	188	74	114	32.66%–46.49%
FY2002	32.85%	137	45	92	25.54%–41.09%
FY2001	48.63%	146	71	75	40.66%–56.67%
FY2000	46.75%	154	72	82	39.05%–54.62%
FY1999	27.08%Small sample	96	26	70	19.20%–36.73%
FY1998	29.09%Small sample	55	16	39	18.77%–42.14%
FY1997	26.87%Small sample	67	18	49	17.72%–38.52%
FY1985	0.00%Small sample	3	0	3	<0.01%–56.15%
Los Fresnos · PIS Explore this court's full context
FY2010	100.00%Small sample	2	2	0	34.24%–100.00%
Detroit · DET Explore this court's full context
FY2010	100.00%Small sample	1	1	0	20.65%–100.00%
Harlingen · HLG Explore this court's full context
FY2009	0.00%Small sample	1	0	1	0.00%–79.35%
San Francisco · SFR Explore this court's full context
FY2003	57.14%Small sample	21	12	9	36.55%–75.53%
New York - Federal Plaza · NYC Explore this court's full context
FY2002	52.63%Small sample	19	10	9	31.71%–72.67%
Hartford · HAR Explore this court's full context
FY2001	33.33%Small sample	3	1	2	6.15%–79.23%
FY2000	33.33%Small sample	3	1	2	6.15%–79.23%
FY1999	100.00%Small sample	2	2	0	34.24%–100.00%
FY1998	52.94%Small sample	34	18	16	36.74%–68.55%
FY1997	0.00%Small sample	2	0	2	0.00%–65.76%
Miami · MIA Explore this court's full context
FY1997	100.00%Small sample	1	1	0	20.65%–100.00%
FY1996	41.27%	126	52	74	33.06%–50.00%
FY1995	25.88%Small sample	85	22	63	17.76%–36.09%
FY1994	66.67%Small sample	3	2	1	20.77%–93.85%
FY1991	0.00%Small sample	1	0	1	0.00%–79.35%
FY1987	0.00%Small sample	1	0	1	0.00%–79.35%
Miami · KRO Explore this court's full context
FY1996	0.00%Small sample	1	0	1	0.00%–79.35%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationality	FY2021–FY2025 · pooled	Total (N)	Court · same nationality	FY2025	FY2024	FY2023	FY2022	FY2021
Chicago
Guatemala	73.68%Small sample	19	30.19% · N 785	—	—	3 / 3	8 / 13	3 / 3
Nicaragua	92.31%Small sample	13	60.07% · N 919	—	—	5 / 6	5 / 5	2 / 2
Honduras	100.00%Small sample	12	40.13% · N 912	—	—	3 / 3	8 / 8	1 / 1
Nigeria	50.00%Small sample	10	62.77% · N 505	—	—	0 / 5	5 / 5	—
India	75.00%Small sample	8	32.08% · N 558	—	—	2 / 2	1 / 1	3 / 5
Mongolia	100.00%Small sample	6	67.80% · N 59	—	—	1 / 1	5 / 5	—
Ukraine	100.00%Small sample	5	82.61% · N 46	—	—	—	5 / 5	—
El Salvador	75.00%Small sample	4	38.74% · N 462	—	—	1 / 1	1 / 2	1 / 1
Kirghizia (Kyrgyzstan)	100.00%Small sample	4	62.60% · N 262	—	—	—	4 / 4	—
Mexico	100.00%Small sample	3	31.05% · N 1,050	—	—	—	3 / 3	—
Nepal	33.33%Small sample	3	10.00% · N 10	—	—	1 / 3	—	—
China	50.00%Small sample	2	64.41% · N 399	—	—	—	1 / 2	—
Democratic Republic Of Congo	100.00%Small sample	2	68.75% · N 32	—	—	2 / 2	—	—
Poland	0.00%Small sample	2	0.00% · N 6	—	—	—	0 / 2	—
Russia	100.00%Small sample	2	80.86% · N 721	—	—	—	1 / 1	1 / 1
Armenia	100.00%Small sample	1	50.00% · N 2	—	—	—	1 / 1	—
Gambia	100.00%Small sample	1	80.00% · N 15	—	—	—	1 / 1	—
Holland	100.00%Small sample	1	100.00% · N 1	—	—	—	1 / 1	—
Iraq	100.00%Small sample	1	81.13% · N 53	—	—	—	—	1 / 1
Jordan	0.00%Small sample	1	59.52% · N 42	—	—	0 / 1	—	—
Lebanon	0.00%Small sample	1	54.55% · N 11	—	—	—	0 / 1	—
Moldavia (Moldova)	100.00%Small sample	1	89.20% · N 176	—	—	—	—	1 / 1
Romania	100.00%Small sample	1	41.67% · N 24	—	—	1 / 1	—	—
Syria	100.00%Small sample	1	82.50% · N 40	—	—	1 / 1	—	—
Venezuela	0.00%Small sample	1	67.17% · N 1,182	—	—	—	—	0 / 1

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Boston · BOS

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Chicago · CHI

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Detroit · DET

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Hartford · HAR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Miami · KRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Miami · MIA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New York - Federal Plaza · NYC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

San Francisco · SFR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Historical record court

Saved application result

Completion fiscal year

Completed on or after

Completed on or before

Results for the current selection

Change filters

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Granted
Denied
Recorded as abandoned
Recorded as withdrawn
Recorded as not adjudicated
Recorded as administratively closed
Other recorded categories
No application result recorded

Bar length shows total records, not grant share. Inspect a month to see every result category. Use arrow keys to explore values; Home and End jump to the first and last.

Exact monthly record counts
Calendar month	Granted	Denied	Recorded as abandoned	Recorded as withdrawn	Recorded as not adjudicated	Recorded as administratively closed	Other recorded categories	No application result recorded	Total records	Grant or denial results (N)	Recorded grant share

Grant share = grants ÷ (grants + denials). Other categories are excluded; a zero denominator is not calculable.

Empty months mean no eligible source rows in this selection, not verified inactivity.

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record court	Fiscal year	Granted	Denied	Recorded as abandoned	Recorded as withdrawn	Recorded as not adjudicated	Recorded as administratively closed	Other recorded categories	No application result recorded	Total records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion date	Historical record court	Saved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

Denominator: respondent-filed BIA IJ Case Appeal events with an exact proceeding link and stored judge code, with a recorded disposition during the displayed period.

Respondent-filed recorded BIA appeal events during FY2021–FY2025
Appeal events (denominator)	DIS · recorded dismissal/affirmance	REM · remand as recorded	SUS · appeal sustained as recorded	Other · mixed recorded dispositions
25	16	1	0	8

Small sample: N is below 100. Counts remain visible; a few events can change the pattern substantially.

About these records

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 105 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code EKN at Chicago in FY2021–FY2025, 83 were grants (79.05%) and 22 were denials (20.95%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 10 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Find qualified legal help

Data and sources

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

22,678Associated proceeding records

5,321Proceedings linked to asylum applications

5,309Eligible dated asylum records

2,575Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts: 10
Earliest recorded completion FY: FY1985
Latest recorded completion FY: FY2023

Why some source records are outside the dated results

29 eligible asylum records have no application result; 29 of them appear in the dated list.
2 asylum-linked proceedings are outside the included proceeding types.
10 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

5,309 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Coverage counts Source files and checks

Official court listing

Directory checked: 2026-09-16EOIR hearing directory

Not on the checked official listing

The checked listing does not establish why this name is absent or where this person works now.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.