AsylumCompass
Search
Saved
English
EnglishEspañol中文

This historical identity has not been confirmed. Records cannot be attributed to this person.

In FY2016, 0 of 1 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code GPM at San Antonio were grants (0.00%) and 1 were denials (100.00%). That year, the court recorded 8.84%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · San Antonio · SNA

Grants 0 · Denials 1 · N 1
95% interval: 0.00%–79.35%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

Judge code GPM
0.00%N 1
San Antonio
8.84%N 328
United States · all courts
No national figure is published for this period

Among comparable judge codes at this court

This figure has fewer than 100 grant-or-denial records, so it is not placed among comparable judge codes.

Record coverage
10 courts with recordsFY1984–FY2016 · 78 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · not on the official listing checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at San Antonio

0%25%50%75%100%FY2007FY2008FY2009FY2010FY2011FY2012FY2013FY2014FY2015FY201627.27%64.00%51.85%53.85%60.71%33.33%47.62%43.75%0.00%32.05%50.41%35.38%54.78%55.13%54.21%52.71%41.49%5.66%8.84%
  • Judge code GPM
  • San Antonio
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
San Antonio · SNAExplore this court's full context
FY20160.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY201443.75%Small sample167923.10%–66.82%
FY201347.62%Small sample21101128.34%–67.63%
FY201233.33%Small sample2171417.19%–54.63%
FY201160.71%Small sample28171142.41%–76.43%
FY201053.85%Small sample26141235.46%–71.24%
FY200951.85%Small sample27141333.99%–69.26%
FY200864.00%Small sample2516944.52%–79.75%
FY200727.27%Small sample2261613.15%–48.15%
FY200652.94%Small sample34181636.74%–68.55%
FY200554.55%Small sample22121034.66%–73.08%
FY200486.67%Small sample1513262.12%–96.26%
FY200331.71%Small sample41132819.56%–46.98%
FY200252.17%Small sample23121132.96%–70.76%
FY200138.10%Small sample2181320.75%–59.12%
FY200042.11%Small sample1981123.14%–63.72%
FY199936.00%Small sample2591620.25%–55.48%
FY199820.00%Small sample204168.07%–41.60%
FY199720.00%Small sample204168.07%–41.60%
FY199613.04%Small sample233204.54%–32.13%
FY19958.33%Small sample242222.32%–25.85%
FY199418.75%Small sample163136.59%–43.01%
FY19930.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY199250.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%
FY19910.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY19900.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY19870.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
FY19860.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19850.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Pearsall · PSDExplore this court's full context
FY201686.36%Small sample2219366.67%–95.25%
FY201518.92%Small sample377309.48%–34.20%
FY201412.12%Small sample334294.82%–27.33%
FY201320.00%Small sample5143.62%–62.45%
FY201216.67%Small sample122104.70%–44.80%
FY201127.27%Small sample11389.75%–56.56%
FY201033.33%Small sample1551015.18%–58.29%
FY200957.14%Small sample2112936.55%–75.53%
FY200833.33%Small sample1861216.28%–56.25%
FY200745.00%Small sample2091125.82%–65.79%
FY20060.00%Small sample606<0.01%–39.03%
Harlingen · HLGExplore this court's full context
FY20090.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20080.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY199328.57%Small sample7258.22%–64.11%
FY199210.00%Small sample202182.79%–30.10%
FY199112.50%Small sample162143.50%–36.02%
FY199016.67%Small sample6611559.57%–27.43%
FY198928.21%Small sample39112816.54%–43.78%
Laredo · LROExplore this court's full context
FY20070.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20060.00%Small sample110110.00%–25.88%
FY200511.76%Small sample172153.29%–34.34%
FY200450.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%
FY200325.00%Small sample4134.56%–69.94%
FY20000.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY19990.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY19980.00%Small sample606<0.01%–39.03%
FY19970.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY199625.00%Small sample12398.89%–53.23%
FY199512.50%Small sample8172.24%–47.09%
FY19940.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
FY19930.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY19900.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19890.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
San Francisco · SFRExplore this court's full context
FY200433.33%Small sample93612.06%–64.58%
Memphis · MEMExplore this court's full context
FY199756.25%Small sample169733.18%–76.90%
FY199650.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%
Los Fresnos · PISExplore this court's full context
FY199348.65%Small sample37181933.45%–64.11%
FY199228.89%Small sample45133217.73%–43.37%
FY199120.51%Small sample3983110.78%–35.53%
FY199026.67%Small sample75205517.98%–37.63%
FY198934.38%Small sample32112120.41%–51.69%
New Orleans · NOLExplore this court's full context
FY199332.43%Small sample37122519.63%–48.54%
FY199235.90%Small sample39142522.74%–51.58%
FY19900.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY19890.00%Small sample4040.00%–48.99%
FY19880.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY19840.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
New York - Varick · NYVExplore this court's full context
FY19930.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
Miami · MIAExplore this court's full context
FY19915.88%Small sample171161.05%–26.98%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Dallas · DAL · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Concord · CCC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dallas · DAL

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Harlingen · HLG

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Houston - Jefferson Street Immigration Court · HOU

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Laredo · LRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Memphis · MEM

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Miami · MIA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New Orleans · NOL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New York - Varick · NYV

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

San Francisco · SFR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

San Antonio · SNA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Filters update automatically. Court counts cover all dates; result counts follow the selected court and dates.

Results for the current selection

Change filters

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

Denominator: respondent-filed BIA IJ Case Appeal events with an exact proceeding link and stored judge code, with a recorded disposition during the displayed period.

Respondent-filed recorded BIA appeal events during FY2021–FY2025
Appeal events (denominator)DIS · recorded dismissal/affirmanceREM · remand as recordedSUS · appeal sustained as recordedOther · mixed recorded dispositions
30003

Small sample: N is below 100. Counts remain visible; a few events can change the pattern substantially.

About these records

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 1 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code GPM at San Antonio in FY2016, 0 were grants (0.00%) and 1 were denials (100.00%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 10 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Find qualified legal help

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

61,469Associated proceeding records
4,209Proceedings linked to asylum applications
4,201Eligible dated asylum records
1,299Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
10
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY1984
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2019
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 45 eligible asylum records have no application result; 45 of them appear in the dated list.
  • 7 asylum-linked proceedings are outside the included proceeding types.
  • 1 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

4,201 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Coverage countsSource files and checks

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

Not on the checked official listing

The checked listing does not establish why this name is absent or where this person works now.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Concord

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
16
Other schedule types
16
Reliable asylum association
15
No identifiable asylum association
1

Dallas

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
69
Other schedule types
68
No identifiable asylum association
69

Harlingen

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
5,432
Other schedule types
5,222
Reliable asylum association
2,430
No identifiable asylum association
3,002

Houston - Jefferson Street Immigration Court

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
7
Other schedule types
7
No identifiable asylum association
7

Laredo

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
11,164
Other schedule types
10,932
Reliable asylum association
782
No identifiable asylum association
10,361
Unlinked asylum records
21

Memphis · MEM

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
118
Other schedule types
117
Reliable asylum association
96
No identifiable asylum association
22

Miami · MIA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
143
Other schedule types
142
Reliable asylum association
89
No identifiable asylum association
54

New Orleans · NOL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,539
Other schedule types
1,508
Reliable asylum association
381
No identifiable asylum association
1,158

New York - Varick

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
34
Other schedule types
34
Reliable asylum association
14
No identifiable asylum association
20

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
13,261
Other schedule types
13,015
Reliable asylum association
5,311
No identifiable asylum association
7,950

Pearsall

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
27,813
Other schedule types
10,138
Reliable asylum association
3,959
No identifiable asylum association
23,853
Unlinked asylum records
1

San Francisco · SFR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
44
Other schedule types
44
Reliable asylum association
40
No identifiable asylum association
4

San Antonio

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
66,518
Other schedule types
41,606
Reliable asylum association
5,689
No identifiable asylum association
60,798
Unlinked asylum records
31
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks
Source files and checks · Attribution details

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: GPM · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Download certified judge-code BIA aggregates · Companion manifest · Read disclosure certificate · Methods

By historical court and periodBIA appeal outcomes by yearData package changes

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY1984–FY2019

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Official FOIA libraryOriginal CASE ZIP · about 4.55 GBEOIR code keyEdition details and fingerprint

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Glenn P. Mcphaul: historical immigration judge code records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/glenn-p-mcphaul-gpm Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge