AsylumCompass
Saved
English

From FY2021 to FY2025, 366 of 810 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code IRS at Detroit were grants (45.19%) and 444 were denials (54.81%). In the same years, the court recorded 33.51% and the national figure was 37.33%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Detroit · DET

Grants 366 · Denials 444 · N 810
95% interval: 41.79%–48.63%

Judge code IRS
45.19%N 810
Detroit
33.51%N 3,253
United States · all courts
37.33%N 367,995

Among comparable judge codes at this court

7 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2021–FY2025. Their recorded grant shares range from 12.64% to 50.43%; the median is 42.59%.
FY2026 so far
2.45%204 records through 2026-08-31 · court: 3.98%
Record coverage
7 courts with recordsFY2006–FY2026 · 21 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Hearing dates on calendar
3,706 master · 1,868 individualDetroit · proceedings with hearing dates, 2026-09–2029-08Hearing schedule
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · official listing: Detroit, checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Detroit

0%25%50%75%100%FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY202633.33%23.64%26.32%25.93%42.59%43.09%74.19%32.12%2.45%19.86%20.68%27.11%27.18%36.87%40.79%37.32%34.06%24.64%3.98%37.13%46.12%47.28%43.52%23.13%
  • Judge code IRS
  • Detroit
  • United States · all courts
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Detroit · DETExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year2.45%20451991.05%–5.61%
FY202532.12%1936213125.94%–39.01%
FY202474.19%1551154066.78%–80.44%
FY202343.09%24610614037.05%–49.34%
FY202242.59%162699335.24%–50.29%
FY202125.93%Small sample54144016.12%–38.93%
FY202026.32%Small sample57154216.65%–38.98%
FY201923.64%Small sample55134214.37%–36.35%
FY201833.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%
FY20090.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20080.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20060.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
El Paso · ELPExplore this court's full context
FY2023100.00%Small sample33043.85%–100.00%
Houston – Greenspoint Park · HGPExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
LaSalle · JNAExplore this court's full context
FY202033.33%Small sample2171417.19%–54.63%
FY201938.71%Small sample31121923.73%–56.18%
Adelanto · ADLExplore this court's full context
FY201839.25%107426530.53%–48.72%
FY201724.10%Small sample83206316.17%–34.31%
FY20160.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Florence · FLOExplore this court's full context
FY2018100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
Eloy · ELOExplore this court's full context
FY20170.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationalityFY2021–FY2025 · pooledTotal (N)Court · same nationalityFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Detroit
Honduras10.68%1035.54% · N 3610 / 150 / 39 / 492 / 280 / 8
Guatemala22.67%Small sample7512.74% · N 2590 / 10 / 18 / 316 / 333 / 9
Mexico11.27%Small sample713.50% · N 3430 / 252 / 124 / 172 / 110 / 6
Iraq85.29%Small sample6878.54% · N 2193 / 519 / 207 / 726 / 283 / 8
Cuba78.95%Small sample5777.17% · N 18415 / 2521 / 218 / 101 / 1—
Venezuela84.21%Small sample5767.59% · N 2168 / 1317 / 1815 / 178 / 9—
Colombia14.81%Small sample548.68% · N 2881 / 80 / 137 / 33——
Nicaragua64.44%Small sample4556.33% · N 1585 / 1617 / 184 / 53 / 6—
Bangladesh65.00%Small sample4033.33% · N 1230 / 99 / 1116 / 181 / 2—
El Salvador6.06%Small sample3313.45% · N 1190 / 80 / 12 / 110 / 90 / 4
India17.65%Small sample1713.10% · N 840 / 22 / 41 / 60 / 40 / 1
Jordan46.15%Small sample1343.48% · N 234 / 11—1 / 11 / 1—
Vietnam69.23%Small sample1353.85% · N 782 / 63 / 31 / 13 / 3—
Angola100.00%Small sample1084.62% · N 262 / 23 / 35 / 5——
Yemen80.00%Small sample1050.00% · N 247 / 7—0 / 10 / 11 / 1
Russia77.78%Small sample948.72% · N 397 / 8——0 / 1—
Senegal50.00%Small sample821.13% · N 711 / 33 / 5———
Syria85.71%Small sample764.52% · N 31———6 / 60 / 1
Albania83.33%Small sample640.00% · N 15—1 / 10 / 11 / 13 / 3
Democratic Republic Of Congo100.00%Small sample673.68% · N 19——5 / 5—1 / 1
Haiti0.00%Small sample60.00% · N 160 / 1—0 / 20 / 20 / 1
Ukraine66.67%Small sample655.56% · N 9——4 / 50 / 1—
Cameroon100.00%Small sample586.36% · N 221 / 11 / 11 / 12 / 2—
Libya0.00%Small sample50.00% · N 80 / 5————
Rwanda100.00%Small sample571.43% · N 14—4 / 41 / 1——
Uganda100.00%Small sample592.31% · N 13—5 / 5———
Brazil0.00%Small sample45.00% · N 20——0 / 20 / 2—
Ecuador0.00%Small sample413.04% · N 23——0 / 4——
Egypt100.00%Small sample437.50% · N 241 / 11 / 12 / 2——
Germany0.00%Small sample40.00% · N 4————0 / 4
Lebanon25.00%Small sample458.82% · N 341 / 20 / 2———
Nigeria25.00%Small sample443.33% · N 300 / 2——0 / 11 / 1
Peru0.00%Small sample430.95% · N 420 / 4————
Belize0.00%Small sample30.00% · N 120 / 3————
China100.00%Small sample339.13% · N 231 / 12 / 2———
Jamaica66.67%Small sample340.00% · N 5—1 / 1—1 / 10 / 1
Stateless - Alien Unable To Name A Country66.67%Small sample376.92% · N 130 / 11 / 1—1 / 1—
Uzbekistan33.33%Small sample311.11% · N 180 / 11 / 2———
Zimbabwe33.33%Small sample336.36% · N 11——1 / 3——
Burundi100.00%Small sample2100.00% · N 3———1 / 11 / 1
Chile50.00%Small sample260.00% · N 5——1 / 10 / 1—
Ghana50.00%Small sample262.50% · N 80 / 1——1 / 1—
Pakistan50.00%Small sample250.00% · N 10——1 / 1—0 / 1
Saudi Arabia50.00%Small sample266.67% · N 6————1 / 2
Bosnia-Herzegovina0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1————0 / 1
Burkina Faso100.00%Small sample150.00% · N 2———1 / 1—
Congo100.00%Small sample160.00% · N 10——1 / 1——
Ethiopia100.00%Small sample157.14% · N 71 / 1————
Gambia100.00%Small sample142.86% · N 7—1 / 1———
Georgia0.00%Small sample133.33% · N 60 / 1————
Guadeloupe0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 2——0 / 1——
Guinea100.00%Small sample140.00% · N 10———1 / 1—
Holland0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1———0 / 1—
Kenya0.00%Small sample120.00% · N 5———0 / 1—
Kosovo0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 20 / 1————
Malawi0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1——0 / 1——
Malaysia0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 10 / 1————
Mauritania100.00%Small sample115.00% · N 201 / 1————
Serbia0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1——0 / 1——
Spain100.00%Small sample116.67% · N 61 / 1————
Sri Lanka100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 1———1 / 1—
Sudan100.00%Small sample120.00% · N 5——1 / 1——
Turkiye100.00%Small sample150.00% · N 12—1 / 1———
Uruguay0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1——0 / 1——
El Paso
Jordan100.00%Small sample3100.00% · N 3——3 / 3——
Houston – Greenspoint Park
Colombia0.00%Small sample13.14% · N 574——0 / 1——

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Detroit · DET · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Same count scale for both hearing types. Browse horizontally to see all 36 months.

Proceedings

Master Calendar Hearings

Individual / Merits Hearings

Months with no retained records show 0.

Monthly counts are available for all recorded courts below.

Adelanto · ADL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Detroit · DET

Monthly counts

Ian R. Simons · IRS · Detroit · DET · 2026-09–2029-08 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-08 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-094497117660
2026-103577520060
2026-113675725044
2026-123379016777
2027-01189498735
2027-02175569445
2027-033566819654
2027-043306917752
2027-052405814334
2027-06134617936
2027-071657310363
2027-081935211033
2027-0933591432
2027-101960939
2027-11049030
2027-12136015
2028-01066049
2028-02065051
2028-03066045
2028-04049026
2028-05156036
2028-0632611834
2028-07053026
2028-082245814036
2028-0942533145
2028-1024581851
2028-11058025
2028-12041029
2029-0138841763
2029-02055044
2029-03062049
2029-040000
2029-050000
2029-060000
2029-070000
2029-080000

Retained: 5,574Excluded: 1,029Unable to confirm: 21Source files and checks

Eloy · ELO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Florence · FLO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

LaSalle · JNA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

San Francisco · SFR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

This judge code has an unresolved identity or name association. Its BIA row is unavailable; this is not a zero count.

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 810 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code IRS at Detroit in FY2021–FY2025, 366 were grants (45.19%) and 444 were denials (54.81%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 7 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

Why is FY2026 marked as a partial year?

Fiscal year 2026 runs from 2025-10-01 to 2026-09-30, and the source data end on 2026-08-31. FY2026 figures cover only part of the year, so they are not compared with complete years.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Where does this judge hear cases now?

EOIR’s official hearing directory, checked 2026-09-16, lists this name at Detroit.

Under this judge code, the 2026-08 EOIR edition records hearing dates from 2026-09 to 2029-08 at Detroit: 3,706 master and 1,868 individual proceedings.

A listing or a scheduled date does not establish a sole duty station.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

18,773Associated proceeding records
7,942Proceedings linked to asylum applications
3,898Eligible dated asylum records
1,382Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
25
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY1998
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2026 · Partial year
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 4,041 eligible asylum records have no completion date.
  • 4,472 eligible asylum records have no application result; 445 of them appear in the dated list. 4,027 records lack both a usable completion date and an application result. The missing-date and missing-result counts overlap.
  • 3 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

7,939 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

On the checked official listing

An official listing may include supervisory or multiple-court assignments; it does not establish a sole duty station.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Adelanto · ADL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
7,876
Other schedule types
2,720
Reliable asylum association
3,972
No identifiable asylum association
3,904

Detroit

Retained: 5,574Excluded: 1,029Unable to confirm: 21

Raw Master and Individual records
6,624
Unconfirmed proportion
0.32%
Recorded handling reason
1,025
Recorded proceeding completion
4
Multiple future records without a handling reason
21
Historical schedule records
42,034
Future schedule records
6,645
Other schedule types
1,922
Reliable asylum association
25,606
No identifiable asylum association
23,073
Schedule and proceeding judge codes differ
2

Eloy

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
49
Other schedule types
11
Reliable asylum association
6
No identifiable asylum association
43

Florence

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
8
Other schedule types
4
Reliable asylum association
3
No identifiable asylum association
5

LaSalle

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
87
Other schedule types
2
Reliable asylum association
83
No identifiable asylum association
4

San Francisco · SFR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
296
Reliable asylum association
215
No identifiable asylum association
81
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: IRS · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY1998–FY2026 · Partial year: FY2026

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Judge Ian R. Simons · Detroit Immigration Court asylum records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/ian-r-simons-irs Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge