AsylumCompass
Saved
English

This historical identity has not been confirmed. Records cannot be attributed to this person.

From FY2021 to FY2025, 74 of 720 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code JRN at Charlotte were grants (10.28%) and 646 were denials (89.72%). In the same years, the court recorded 11.78% and the national figure was 37.33%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Charlotte · CHL

Grants 74 · Denials 646 · N 720
95% interval: 8.27%–12.71%

Judge code JRN
10.28%N 720
Charlotte
11.78%N 5,899
United States · all courts
37.33%N 367,995

Among comparable judge codes at this court

20 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2021–FY2025. Their recorded grant shares range from 0.84% to 36.81%; the median is 9.66%.
FY2026 so far
0.89%112 records through 2026-08-31 · court: 4.39%
Record coverage
6 courts with recordsFY2009–FY2026 · 22 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Hearing dates on calendar
8,944 master · 108 individualCharlotte · proceedings with hearing dates, 2026-09–2029-08Hearing schedule
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · not on the official listing checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Charlotte

0%10%20%30%40%50%FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY20260.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%15.50%14.07%9.22%9.48%3.25%0.89%12.71%5.13%6.98%12.02%16.45%18.14%16.21%19.40%7.08%4.39%37.13%46.12%47.28%43.52%23.13%
  • Judge code JRN
  • Charlotte
  • United States · all courts
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Charlotte · CHLExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year0.89%11211110.16%–4.88%
FY20253.25%12341191.27%–8.06%
FY20249.48%116111055.38%–16.19%
FY20239.22%217201976.05%–13.81%
FY202214.07%135191169.20%–20.94%
FY202115.50%1292010910.27%–22.74%
FY20200.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20190.00%Small sample150150.00%–20.39%
FY20180.00%Small sample9090.00%–29.91%
FY20170.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY2014100.00%Small sample22034.24%–100.00%
FY20120.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20110.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20090.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
New York - Federal Plaza · NYCExplore this court's full context
FY2024100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
Miami · MIAExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Stewart · SDCExplore this court's full context
FY2022100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
FY202125.00%Small sample4134.56%–69.94%
FY202015.58%Small sample7712659.15%–25.29%
FY201910.42%Small sample9610865.76%–18.12%
Guaynabo · SAJExplore this court's full context
FY2022100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
Tacoma · TACExplore this court's full context
FY201950.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationalityFY2021–FY2025 · pooledTotal (N)Court · same nationalityFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Charlotte
Honduras4.56%2417.63% · N 1,5980 / 330 / 352 / 736 / 543 / 46
Mexico5.13%1173.03% · N 8570 / 151 / 190 / 322 / 233 / 28
Guatemala0.00%1108.41% · N 7250 / 210 / 80 / 400 / 270 / 14
El Salvador7.29%Small sample9610.08% · N 6150 / 180 / 83 / 300 / 144 / 26
Venezuela58.06%Small sample3131.14% · N 4400 / 57 / 86 / 115 / 7—
Brazil0.00%Small sample272.61% · N 4220 / 50 / 120 / 9—0 / 1
Colombia4.35%Small sample237.60% · N 3290 / 90 / 81 / 6——
Nicaragua14.29%Small sample2117.20% · N 2501 / 81 / 40 / 51 / 30 / 1
Russia100.00%Small sample966.00% · N 100—1 / 1—4 / 44 / 4
Peru0.00%Small sample80.00% · N 670 / 10 / 7———
Egypt80.00%Small sample585.71% · N 141 / 2———3 / 3
India25.00%Small sample420.00% · N 35—0 / 20 / 1—1 / 1
Ecuador0.00%Small sample315.56% · N 450 / 3————
Eritrea100.00%Small sample3100.00% · N 6——2 / 2—1 / 1
Haiti0.00%Small sample323.53% · N 34——0 / 1—0 / 2
Palestine100.00%Small sample3100.00% · N 3——3 / 3——
China100.00%Small sample241.67% · N 12—1 / 11 / 1——
Cuba50.00%Small sample222.73% · N 441 / 2————
Democratic Republic Of Congo100.00%Small sample237.50% · N 8——1 / 1—1 / 1
Pakistan0.00%Small sample20.00% · N 2—0 / 1——0 / 1
Belize0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1——0 / 1——
Cameroon100.00%Small sample136.36% · N 11———1 / 1—
Congo0.00%Small sample116.67% · N 12———0 / 1—
Dominican Republic0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 7———0 / 1—
Ghana100.00%Small sample133.33% · N 6——1 / 1——
Iran100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 11 / 1————
Nepal0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 4—0 / 1———
Sudan0.00%Small sample150.00% · N 6—0 / 1———
Stewart
Eritrea50.00%Small sample240.00% · N 15————1 / 2
Cameroon100.00%Small sample162.50% · N 24———1 / 1—
Cuba0.00%Small sample111.54% · N 26————0 / 1
Honduras0.00%Small sample15.61% · N 107————0 / 1
Miami · MIA
Venezuela0.00%Small sample136.61% · N 956——0 / 1——
New York - Federal Plaza
Belarus100.00%Small sample196.84% · N 95—1 / 1———
Guaynabo · SAJ
Russia100.00%Small sample177.78% · N 9———1 / 1—

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Charlotte · CHL · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Same count scale for both hearing types. Browse horizontally to see all 36 months.

Proceedings

Master Calendar Hearings

Individual / Merits Hearings

Months with no retained records show 0.

Monthly counts are available for all recorded courts below.

Charlotte · CHL

Monthly counts

Jeffery R. Nance · JRN · Charlotte · CHL · 2026-09–2029-08 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-08 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-090000
2026-10700210
2026-11189308219
2026-125591820213
2027-014383618722
2027-024651818012
2027-0366502490
2027-0457101870
2027-0554201750
2027-0664102220
2027-0759401960
2027-0854501670
2027-0970522772
2027-1053702080
2027-1146501800
2027-1255802130
2028-0136501840
2028-0257042524
2028-0346502180
2028-040000
2028-050000
2028-060000
2028-070000
2028-080000
2028-090000
2028-100000
2028-110000
2028-120000
2029-010000
2029-020000
2029-030000
2029-040000
2029-050000
2029-060000
2029-070000
2029-080000

Retained: 9,052Excluded: 3,629Unable to confirm: 2Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Stewart · SDC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Tacoma · TAC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

Denominator: respondent-filed BIA IJ Case Appeal events with an exact proceeding link and stored judge code, with a recorded disposition during the displayed period.

Respondent-filed recorded BIA appeal events during FY2021–FY2025
Appeal events (denominator)DIS · recorded dismissal/affirmanceREM · remand as recordedSUS · appeal sustained as recordedOther · mixed recorded dispositions
21678170121

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 720 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code JRN at Charlotte in FY2021–FY2025, 74 were grants (10.28%) and 646 were denials (89.72%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 6 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

Why is FY2026 marked as a partial year?

Fiscal year 2026 runs from 2025-10-01 to 2026-09-30, and the source data end on 2026-08-31. FY2026 figures cover only part of the year, so they are not compared with complete years.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Where does this judge hear cases now?

This name is not on EOIR’s official hearing directory as checked on 2026-09-16.

Under this judge code, the 2026-08 EOIR edition records hearing dates from 2026-09 to 2029-08 at Charlotte: 8,944 master and 108 individual proceedings.

A listing or a scheduled date does not establish a sole duty station.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

37,161Associated proceeding records
10,497Proceedings linked to asylum applications
4,710Eligible dated asylum records
1,050Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
14
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY2009
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2026 · Partial year
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 5,782 eligible asylum records have no completion date.
  • 6,535 eligible asylum records have no application result; 766 of them appear in the dated list. 5,769 records lack both a usable completion date and an application result. The missing-date and missing-result counts overlap.
  • 5 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

10,492 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

Not on the checked official listing

The checked listing does not establish why this name is absent or where this person works now.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Charlotte

Retained: 9,052Excluded: 3,629Unable to confirm: 2

Raw Master and Individual records
12,683
Unconfirmed proportion
0.02%
Recorded handling reason
3,629
Multiple future records without a handling reason
2
Historical schedule records
66,661
Future schedule records
12,873
Other schedule types
360
Reliable asylum association
33,418
No identifiable asylum association
46,116
Schedule and proceeding judge codes differ
19

Pearsall

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
29
Other schedule types
24
No identifiable asylum association
29

Stewart

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
7,846
Other schedule types
1,565
Reliable asylum association
1,805
No identifiable asylum association
6,041

Tacoma

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
30
Other schedule types
10
Reliable asylum association
7
No identifiable asylum association
23
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: JRN · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY2009–FY2026 · Partial year: FY2026

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Jeffery R. Nance: historical immigration judge code records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/jeffery-r-nance-jrn Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge