AsylumCompass
Saved
English

No eligible dated records for FY2026 are available at Los Fresnos · PIS. Historical figures below keep their own years.

In FY2023, 0 of 2 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code JGC at Los Fresnos · PIS were grants (0.00%) and 2 were denials (100.00%). That year, the court recorded 2.85% and the national figure was 47.18%. EOIR data through 2026-09-30; past records do not predict an individual case.

Historical comparison · Recorded grant share · Los Fresnos · PIS

Grants 0 · Denials 2 · N 2
95% interval: 0.00%–65.76%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

Judge code JGC
0.00%N 2
Los Fresnos · PIS
2.85%N 316
United States · all courts
47.18%N 77,149

Among comparable judge codes at this court

This figure has fewer than 100 grant-or-denial records, so it is not placed among comparable judge codes.

Record coverage
21 courts with recordsFY2001–FY2023 · 51 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Data through
2026-09-30EOIR records · not on the official listing checked 2026-10-24Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Los Fresnos · PIS

0%10%20%30%40%50%FY2014FY2015FY2016FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY20230.00%0.00%0.00%2.11%1.89%14.67%20.00%0.00%25.41%25.54%10.10%10.27%8.96%11.51%19.41%11.57%5.36%2.85%48.76%48.44%43.29%38.08%33.32%29.99%27.95%37.09%46.08%47.18%
  • Judge code JGC
  • Los Fresnos · PIS
  • United States · all courts
National and judge-code figures use recorded fiscal years in this source; missing values remain unavailable.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Los Fresnos · PISExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY2021Not calculable000Not calculable
FY202020.00%Small sample5143.62%–62.45%
FY201914.67%Small sample7511648.39%–24.38%
FY20181.89%10621040.52%–6.62%
FY20172.11%Small sample952930.58%–7.35%
FY20160.00%Small sample14014<0.01%–21.53%
FY20150.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20140.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20110.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY1994Not calculable000Not calculable
Houston – S. Gessner Road · HSGExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
FY20220.00%Small sample25025<0.01%–13.32%
FY20210.00%Small sample370370.00%–9.41%
FY20200.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
FY20190.00%Small sample190190.00%–16.82%
FY2001100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
Dallas · DALExplore this court's full context
FY20238.33%Small sample121111.49%–35.39%
FY20228.33%Small sample121111.49%–35.39%
FY20210.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20200.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Fort Snelling · BLMExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample12012<0.01%–24.25%
FY202211.11%Small sample9181.99%–43.50%
Oakdale · OAKExplore this court's full context
FY202320.00%Small sample5143.62%–62.45%
FY2022100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
Baltimore · BALExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Harlingen · HLGExplore this court's full context
FY202239.13%Small sample46182826.39%–53.54%
FY202114.29%Small sample426366.72%–27.84%
FY20206.74%Small sample896833.13%–13.94%
FY20190.00%Small sample4040.00%–48.99%
FY20180.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Conroe · CICExplore this court's full context
FY2023Not calculable000Not calculable
FY202225.00%Small sample4134.56%–69.94%
FY20210.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY202037.50%Small sample83513.68%–69.43%
FY20180.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20170.00%Small sample130130.00%–22.81%
FY20160.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
New Orleans · NOLExplore this court's full context
FY20220.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY20210.00%Small sample707<0.01%–35.43%
El Paso · ELPExplore this court's full context
FY20220.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
FY202050.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%
Denver · DENExplore this court's full context
FY2023Not calculable000Not calculable
FY2022100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
El Paso SPC · EPDExplore this court's full context
FY2023Not calculable000Not calculable
FY20210.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
FY2020Not calculable000Not calculable
LaSalle · JNAExplore this court's full context
FY202050.00%Small sample42215.00%–85.00%
Pearsall · PSDExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Aurora · AURExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Elizabeth · ELZExplore this court's full context
FY2020100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
Florence · FLOExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Laredo · LROExplore this court's full context
FY2021Not calculable000Not calculable
FY20200.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Otero · OTOExplore this court's full context
FY20190.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20180.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
Tacoma · TACExplore this court's full context
FY201812.50%Small sample8172.24%–47.09%
Miami · MIAExplore this court's full context
FY20160.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-09-30 · eoir-2026-09-case-v1 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups show FY2026 first and retain historical counts. These are proceeding records, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2026 and historical fiscal years
Recorded nationalityRecorded grant share · FY2026Total (N)Court · same nationalityFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Aurora
Baltimore
El SalvadorNo stored cell for this period—3.43% · N 379———0 / 1——
Fort Snelling
GuatemalaNo stored cell for this period—0.45% · N 222———0 / 80 / 4—
El SalvadorNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 166———0 / 20 / 1—
RomaniaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 30————0 / 2—
EcuadorNo stored cell for this period—0.09% · N 1,090———0 / 1——
ItalyNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0————0 / 1—
MexicoNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 281———0 / 1——
TogoNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 3————1 / 1—
Conroe
NicaraguaNo stored cell for this period—5.26% · N 38————1 / 2—
ColombiaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 16————0 / 1—
GhanaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2————0 / 1—
CubaNo stored cell for this period—3.31% · N 151—————0 / 1
GuatemalaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 55—————0 / 0
HondurasNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 152—————0 / 0
IndiaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 15—————0 / 1
JamaicaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2————0 / 0—
TurkiyeNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 8———0 / 0——
Dallas
HondurasNo stored cell for this period—0.20% · N 1,002———0 / 80 / 1—
El SalvadorNo stored cell for this period—1.00% · N 600———0 / 00 / 70 / 1
GuatemalaNo stored cell for this period—0.40% · N 495———0 / 30 / 2—
CameroonNo stored cell for this period—24.24% · N 33————0 / 1—
NicaraguaNo stored cell for this period—3.13% · N 192———0 / 01 / 1—
VenezuelaNo stored cell for this period—2.49% · N 1,931———1 / 1——
EcuadorNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 68———0 / 0——
MexicoNo stored cell for this period—0.30% · N 1,000———0 / 0—0 / 1
Midway IslandsNo stored cell for this period—————0 / 0——
PeruNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 67————0 / 0—
Denver
CubaNo stored cell for this period—12.50% · N 8————1 / 1—
HondurasNo stored cell for this period—11.59% · N 69———0 / 0——
El Paso
EcuadorNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 18————0 / 2—
NicaraguaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 13————0 / 2—
CubaNo stored cell for this period—6.82% · N 132————0 / 1—
PeruNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 16————0 / 0—
Elizabeth
El Paso SPC
Burma (Myanmar)No stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1—————0 / 1
Dominican RepublicNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2—————0 / 0
HondurasNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 29—————0 / 1
JamaicaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2—————0 / 1
MexicoNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 51—————0 / 1
NicaraguaNo stored cell for this period—7.69% · N 13———0 / 0——
RussiaNo stored cell for this period—100.00% · N 1—————0 / 1
Florence
Harlingen
NicaraguaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 7————16 / 440 / 4
VenezuelaNo stored cell for this period—3.33% · N 60————2 / 20 / 5
BangladeshNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—————1 / 1
CubaNo stored cell for this period—5.88% · N 51————0 / 03 / 11
El SalvadorNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 20—————2 / 11
GuatemalaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 16—————0 / 2
HondurasNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 75—————0 / 8
Houston – S. Gessner Road
MexicoNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 227———0 / 50 / 170 / 18
GuatemalaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 106————0 / 20 / 1
HondurasNo stored cell for this period—0.33% · N 307————0 / 20 / 3
AfghanistanNo stored cell for this period—42.86% · N 7————0 / 1—
El SalvadorNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 161————0 / 10 / 5
IranNo stored cell for this period—20.00% · N 10————0 / 1—
IraqNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 3————0 / 1—
Burma (Myanmar)No stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2—————0 / 3
CubaNo stored cell for this period—2.21% · N 226—————0 / 1
Democratic Republic Of CongoNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—————0 / 0
JamaicaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—————0 / 1
JordanNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 9—————0 / 1
LaosNo stored cell for this period———————0 / 0
LebanonNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2—————0 / 1
NicaraguaNo stored cell for this period—2.33% · N 43—————0 / 1
Sierra LeoneNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1—————0 / 2
SomaliaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2—————0 / 0
LaSalle
Miami · KRO
Laredo
El SalvadorNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 15—————0 / 0
Miami · MIA
New Orleans · NOL
IndiaNo stored cell for this period—24.14% · N 29————0 / 3—
GuatemalaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 160—————0 / 1
HondurasNo stored cell for this period—1.23% · N 813—————0 / 6
Oakdale
TurkiyeNo stored cell for this period—12.50% · N 8———1 / 30 / 0—
BelizeNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1———0 / 2——
NicaraguaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 28————1 / 1—
IndiaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 20———0 / 0——
JamaicaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 10———0 / 0——
KenyaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2———0 / 0——
MexicoNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 53———0 / 0——
Otero
Los Fresnos · PIS
MexicoNo stored cell for this period—————0 / 2——
GuatemalaNo stored cell for this period———————0 / 0
Pearsall
Tacoma

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no stored cell. A zero denominator cannot give a share.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-09-case-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Aurora · AUR · All proceedings · 2026-10–2029-09

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-10–2029-09 (36 months)

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Aurora · AUR

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Baltimore · BAL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Fort Snelling · BLM

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Conroe · CIC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dallas · DAL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Denver · DEN

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

El Paso · ELP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Elizabeth · ELZ

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

El Paso SPC · EPD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Florence · FLO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Harlingen · HLG

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Houston – S. Gessner Road · HSG

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

LaSalle · JNA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Miami · KRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Laredo · LRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Miami · MIA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New Orleans · NOL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Oakdale · OAK

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Omaha · OMA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Otero · OTO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Tacoma · TAC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-09-30 · eoir-2026-09-case-v1 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code · FY2026

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-09 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Decision FY2026 · respondent-filed appeals (A)

Denominator: respondent-filed BIA IJ Case Appeal events with an exact proceeding link and stored judge code, with a recorded disposition during the displayed period.

Respondent-filed recorded BIA appeal events · FY2026
Appeal events (denominator)DIS · recorded dismissal/affirmanceREM · remand as recordedSUS · appeal sustained as recordedOther · mixed recorded dispositions
70106

Small sample: N is below 100. Counts remain visible; a few events can change the pattern substantially.

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 2 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code JGC at Los Fresnos · PIS in FY2023, 0 were grants (0.00%) and 2 were denials (100.00%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 21 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-09-case-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

6,221Associated proceeding records
1,034Proceedings linked to asylum applications
1,034Eligible dated asylum records
710Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
22
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY1994
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2023
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 15 eligible asylum records have no application result; 15 of them appear in the dated list.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-09-30. FY2026 spans its complete fiscal-year calendar; reporting may be incomplete and later revised. Earlier stored dates do not prove service dates or decision authorship.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

1,034 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

Not on the checked official listing

The checked listing does not establish why this name is absent or where this person works now.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-09 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-09-30. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-09-30

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Aurora

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
16
Other schedule types
8
Reliable asylum association
4
No identifiable asylum association
12

Baltimore

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
3
Reliable asylum association
1
No identifiable asylum association
2

Fort Snelling

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
70
Reliable asylum association
46
No identifiable asylum association
24

Conroe

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
2,139
Other schedule types
948
Reliable asylum association
262
No identifiable asylum association
1,877

Dallas

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
171
Other schedule types
9
Reliable asylum association
80
No identifiable asylum association
91

Denver

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
4
Reliable asylum association
2
No identifiable asylum association
2

El Paso

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
32
Reliable asylum association
16
No identifiable asylum association
16

Elizabeth

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1
Reliable asylum association
1

El Paso SPC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
293
Other schedule types
160
Reliable asylum association
48
No identifiable asylum association
245

Florence

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
4
Reliable asylum association
2
No identifiable asylum association
2

Harlingen

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,497
Reliable asylum association
1,250
No identifiable asylum association
247

Houston – S. Gessner Road

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
2,283
Other schedule types
2
Reliable asylum association
755
No identifiable asylum association
1,528

LaSalle

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
122
Other schedule types
96
Reliable asylum association
14
No identifiable asylum association
108

Miami · KRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
2
Reliable asylum association
1
No identifiable asylum association
1

Laredo

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
9
Other schedule types
2
Reliable asylum association
6
No identifiable asylum association
3

Miami · MIA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
6
Reliable asylum association
5
No identifiable asylum association
1

New Orleans · NOL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
10
Reliable asylum association
10

Oakdale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
33
Other schedule types
13
Reliable asylum association
20
No identifiable asylum association
13

Omaha

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
3
Reliable asylum association
1
No identifiable asylum association
2

Otero

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
128
Other schedule types
19
Reliable asylum association
47
No identifiable asylum association
81

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
8,826
Other schedule types
2,009
Reliable asylum association
2,312
No identifiable asylum association
6,513
Unlinked asylum records
1

Pearsall

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
237
Other schedule types
231
Reliable asylum association
6
No identifiable asylum association
231

Tacoma

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
139
Other schedule types
46
Reliable asylum association
58
No identifiable asylum association
81
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These counts describe the selected disposition period. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 31,264 · Linked to a stored judge code: 31,252.

Respondent-filed source events: 29,285 · Linked to a stored judge code: 29,275 · Published respondent-filed events: 29,088 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 187.

Judge code: JGC · Stored source field: saved IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: disposition_fy · Historical period: 2025-10-01–2026-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-09-30.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY1994–FY2023

Source edition2026-09

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Fiscal years offered on web pagesFY2021–FY2026

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Judge John G. Crews II · Los Fresnos Immigration Court asylum records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/john-g-crews-ii-jgc Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge