AsylumCompass
Saved
English

This historical identity has not been confirmed. Records cannot be attributed to this person.

In FY2018, 2 of 106 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code JGC at Los Fresnos · PIS were grants (1.89%) and 104 were denials (98.11%). That year, the court recorded 8.96%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Los Fresnos · PIS

Grants 2 · Denials 104 · N 106
95% interval: 0.52%–6.62%

Judge code JGC
1.89%N 106
Los Fresnos · PIS
8.96%N 480
United States · all courts
No national figure is published for this period

Among comparable judge codes at this court

Fewer than 5 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2018, so no comparison among judge codes is drawn.

Record coverage
21 courts with recordsFY2001–FY2023 · 51 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · not on the official listing checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Los Fresnos · PIS

0%10%20%30%40%50%FY2014FY2015FY2016FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY20230.00%0.00%0.00%2.11%1.89%14.67%20.00%0.00%25.41%25.54%10.10%10.27%8.96%11.54%19.57%11.57%5.36%2.85%37.13%46.12%47.28%
  • Judge code JGC
  • Los Fresnos · PIS
  • United States · all courts
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Los Fresnos · PISExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY202020.00%Small sample5143.62%–62.45%
FY201914.67%Small sample7511648.39%–24.38%
FY20181.89%10621040.52%–6.62%
FY20172.11%Small sample952930.58%–7.35%
FY20160.00%Small sample14014<0.01%–21.53%
FY20150.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20140.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20110.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Houston – S. Gessner Road · HSGExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
FY20220.00%Small sample25025<0.01%–13.32%
FY20210.00%Small sample370370.00%–9.41%
FY20200.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
FY20190.00%Small sample190190.00%–16.82%
FY2001100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
Dallas · DALExplore this court's full context
FY20238.33%Small sample121111.49%–35.39%
FY20228.33%Small sample121111.49%–35.39%
FY20210.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20200.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Fort Snelling · BLMExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample12012<0.01%–24.25%
FY202211.11%Small sample9181.99%–43.50%
Oakdale · OAKExplore this court's full context
FY202320.00%Small sample5143.62%–62.45%
FY2022100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
Baltimore · BALExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Harlingen · HLGExplore this court's full context
FY202239.13%Small sample46182826.39%–53.54%
FY202114.29%Small sample426366.72%–27.84%
FY20206.74%Small sample896833.13%–13.94%
FY20190.00%Small sample4040.00%–48.99%
FY20180.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Conroe · CICExplore this court's full context
FY202225.00%Small sample4134.56%–69.94%
FY20210.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY202037.50%Small sample83513.68%–69.43%
FY20180.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20170.00%Small sample130130.00%–22.81%
FY20160.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
New Orleans · NOLExplore this court's full context
FY20220.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY20210.00%Small sample707<0.01%–35.43%
El Paso · ELPExplore this court's full context
FY20220.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
FY202050.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%
Denver · DENExplore this court's full context
FY2022100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
El Paso SPC · EPDExplore this court's full context
FY20210.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
LaSalle · JNAExplore this court's full context
FY202050.00%Small sample42215.00%–85.00%
Pearsall · PSDExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Aurora · AURExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Elizabeth · ELZExplore this court's full context
FY2020100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
Florence · FLOExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Laredo · LROExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Otero · OTOExplore this court's full context
FY20190.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20180.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
Tacoma · TACExplore this court's full context
FY201812.50%Small sample8172.24%–47.09%
Miami · MIAExplore this court's full context
FY20160.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationalityFY2021–FY2025 · pooledTotal (N)Court · same nationalityFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Harlingen
Nicaragua33.33%Small sample4824.18% · N 426———16 / 440 / 4
Cuba27.27%Small sample1137.98% · N 129————3 / 11
El Salvador18.18%Small sample1122.89% · N 83————2 / 11
Honduras0.00%Small sample820.11% · N 174————0 / 8
Venezuela28.57%Small sample757.86% · N 159———2 / 20 / 5
Guatemala0.00%Small sample229.51% · N 61————0 / 2
Bangladesh100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 1————1 / 1
Houston – S. Gessner Road
Mexico0.00%Small sample401.13% · N 354——0 / 50 / 170 / 18
El Salvador0.00%Small sample64.10% · N 902———0 / 10 / 5
Honduras0.00%Small sample52.60% · N 1,076———0 / 20 / 3
Burma (Myanmar)0.00%Small sample30.00% · N 3————0 / 3
Guatemala0.00%Small sample32.79% · N 359———0 / 20 / 1
Sierra Leone0.00%Small sample20.00% · N 2————0 / 2
Afghanistan0.00%Small sample160.00% · N 20———0 / 1—
Cuba0.00%Small sample19.51% · N 536————0 / 1
Iran0.00%Small sample142.86% · N 7———0 / 1—
Iraq0.00%Small sample164.29% · N 14———0 / 1—
Jamaica0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 2————0 / 1
Jordan0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 8————0 / 1
Lebanon0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 7————0 / 1
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample15.19% · N 366————0 / 1
Dallas
Honduras0.00%Small sample95.55% · N 883——0 / 80 / 1—
El Salvador0.00%Small sample85.57% · N 934———0 / 70 / 1
Guatemala0.00%Small sample55.58% · N 430——0 / 30 / 2—
Cameroon0.00%Small sample152.31% · N 65———0 / 1—
Mexico0.00%Small sample11.27% · N 628————0 / 1
Nicaragua100.00%Small sample116.67% · N 156———1 / 1—
Venezuela100.00%Small sample128.51% · N 870——1 / 1——
Fort Snelling
Guatemala0.00%Small sample125.54% · N 650——0 / 80 / 4—
El Salvador0.00%Small sample311.37% · N 431——0 / 20 / 1—
Romania0.00%Small sample28.89% · N 45———0 / 2—
Ecuador0.00%Small sample14.61% · N 737——0 / 1——
Italy0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1———0 / 1—
Mexico0.00%Small sample18.45% · N 355——0 / 1——
Togo100.00%Small sample130.00% · N 10———1 / 1—
New Orleans · NOL
Honduras0.00%Small sample615.43% · N 1,789————0 / 6
India0.00%Small sample366.19% · N 139———0 / 3—
Guatemala0.00%Small sample15.93% · N 540————0 / 1
Conroe
Nicaragua50.00%Small sample215.99% · N 269———1 / 2—
Colombia0.00%Small sample11.68% · N 179———0 / 1—
Cuba0.00%Small sample124.60% · N 126————0 / 1
Ghana0.00%Small sample150.00% · N 8———0 / 1—
India0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 67————0 / 1
Oakdale
Turkiye33.33%Small sample328.77% · N 219——1 / 3——
Belize0.00%Small sample25.88% · N 17——0 / 2——
Nicaragua100.00%Small sample117.12% · N 257———1 / 1—
El Paso
Ecuador0.00%Small sample29.23% · N 65———0 / 2—
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample231.40% · N 207———0 / 2—
Cuba0.00%Small sample125.00% · N 396———0 / 1—
El Paso SPC
Burma (Myanmar)0.00%Small sample133.33% · N 3————0 / 1
Honduras0.00%Small sample13.54% · N 113————0 / 1
Jamaica0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 4————0 / 1
Mexico0.00%Small sample10.63% · N 158————0 / 1
Russia0.00%Small sample158.33% · N 12————0 / 1
Los Fresnos · PIS
Mexico0.00%Small sample20.00% · N 211——0 / 2——
Baltimore
El Salvador0.00%Small sample146.97% · N 1,944——0 / 1——
Denver
Cuba100.00%Small sample152.17% · N 23———1 / 1—

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Aurora · AUR · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Aurora · AUR

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Baltimore · BAL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Fort Snelling · BLM

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Conroe · CIC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dallas · DAL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Denver · DEN

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

El Paso · ELP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Elizabeth · ELZ

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

El Paso SPC · EPD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Florence · FLO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Harlingen · HLG

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Houston – S. Gessner Road · HSG

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

LaSalle · JNA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Miami · KRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Laredo · LRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Miami · MIA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New Orleans · NOL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Oakdale · OAK

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Omaha · OMA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Otero · OTO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Tacoma · TAC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

This judge code has an unresolved identity or name association. Its BIA row is unavailable; this is not a zero count.

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 106 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code JGC at Los Fresnos · PIS in FY2018, 2 were grants (1.89%) and 104 were denials (98.11%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 21 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

6,221Associated proceeding records
1,034Proceedings linked to asylum applications
1,034Eligible dated asylum records
710Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
22
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY1994
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2023
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 15 eligible asylum records have no application result; 15 of them appear in the dated list.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

1,034 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

Not on the checked official listing

The checked listing does not establish why this name is absent or where this person works now.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Aurora

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
16
Other schedule types
8
Reliable asylum association
4
No identifiable asylum association
12

Baltimore

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
3
Reliable asylum association
1
No identifiable asylum association
2

Fort Snelling

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
70
Reliable asylum association
46
No identifiable asylum association
24

Conroe

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
2,139
Other schedule types
948
Reliable asylum association
262
No identifiable asylum association
1,877

Dallas

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
171
Other schedule types
9
Reliable asylum association
80
No identifiable asylum association
91

Denver

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
4
Reliable asylum association
2
No identifiable asylum association
2

El Paso

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
32
Reliable asylum association
16
No identifiable asylum association
16

Elizabeth

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1
Reliable asylum association
1

El Paso SPC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
293
Other schedule types
160
Reliable asylum association
48
No identifiable asylum association
245

Florence

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
4
Reliable asylum association
2
No identifiable asylum association
2

Harlingen

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,497
Reliable asylum association
1,250
No identifiable asylum association
247

Houston – S. Gessner Road

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
2,283
Other schedule types
2
Reliable asylum association
755
No identifiable asylum association
1,528

LaSalle

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
122
Other schedule types
96
Reliable asylum association
14
No identifiable asylum association
108

Miami · KRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
2
Reliable asylum association
1
No identifiable asylum association
1

Laredo

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
9
Other schedule types
2
Reliable asylum association
6
No identifiable asylum association
3

Miami · MIA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
6
Reliable asylum association
5
No identifiable asylum association
1

New Orleans · NOL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
10
Reliable asylum association
10

Oakdale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
33
Other schedule types
13
Reliable asylum association
20
No identifiable asylum association
13

Omaha

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
3
Reliable asylum association
1
No identifiable asylum association
2

Otero

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
128
Other schedule types
19
Reliable asylum association
47
No identifiable asylum association
81

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
8,826
Other schedule types
2,009
Reliable asylum association
2,312
No identifiable asylum association
6,513
Unlinked asylum records
1

Pearsall

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
237
Other schedule types
231
Reliable asylum association
6
No identifiable asylum association
231

Tacoma

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
139
Other schedule types
46
Reliable asylum association
58
No identifiable asylum association
81
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: JGC · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY1994–FY2023

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “John G., II Crews: historical immigration judge code records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/john-g-ii-crews-jgc Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge