AsylumCompass
Saved
English

In FY2026, 36 of 215 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code JMF at Boston · BOS were grants (16.7%) and 179 were denials (83.3%). That year, the court recorded 13.8% and the national figure was 6.7%. EOIR data through 2026-09-30; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Boston · BOS

Grants 36 · Denials 179 · N 215
95% interval: 12.3%–22.3%

Judge code JMF
16.7%N 215
Boston · BOS
13.8%N 1,893
United States · all courts
6.7%N 158,532

Among comparable judge codes at this court

7 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2026. Their recorded grant shares range from 2.5% to 31.9%; the median is 14.5%.
Record coverage
7 courts with recordsFY1998–FY2026 · 22 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Hearing dates on calendar
5,173 master · 1,819 individualBoston · BOS · proceedings with hearing dates, 2026-10–2029-09Hearing schedule
Data through
2026-09-30EOIR records · official listing: Boston · BOS, checked 2026-10-24Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Boston · BOS

0%25%50%75%100%FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY20260.0%25.0%20.0%3.0%48.6%34.1%43.0%27.9%16.7%63.1%54.7%44.1%48.1%60.4%56.0%44.6%45.7%42.2%13.8%38.1%33.3%30.0%28.0%37.1%46.1%47.2%43.3%23.0%6.7%
  • Judge code JMF
  • Boston · BOS
  • United States · all courts
National and judge-code figures use recorded fiscal years in this source; missing values remain unavailable.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Boston · BOSExplore this court's full context
FY202616.7%2153617912.3%–22.3%
FY202527.9%2517018122.7%–33.7%
FY202443.0%128557334.7%–51.6%
FY202334.1%138479126.7%–42.3%
FY202248.6%Small sample72353737.4%–59.9%
FY20213.0%Small sample331320.5%–15.3%
FY202020.0%Small sample55114411.6%–32.4%
FY201925.0%Small sample40103014.2%–40.2%
FY20180.0%Small sample1010.0%–79.3%
FY2017Not calculable000Not calculable
FY2016Not calculable000Not calculable
FY2015Not calculable000Not calculable
FY2014Not calculable000Not calculable
FY2013Not calculable000Not calculable
FY2012Not calculable000Not calculable
FY20110.0%Small sample1010.0%–79.3%
FY2010Not calculable000Not calculable
FY2009Not calculable000Not calculable
FY2008Not calculable000Not calculable
FY20070.0%Small sample1010.0%–79.3%
FY2005Not calculable000Not calculable
FY20040.0%Small sample2020.0%–65.8%
FY2002Not calculable000Not calculable
FY20010.0%Small sample1010.0%–79.3%
FY20000.0%Small sample2020.0%–65.8%
FY199933.3%Small sample3126.1%–79.2%
FY19980.0%Small sample1010.0%–79.3%
FY1997Not calculable000Not calculable
FY1995Not calculable000Not calculable
Newark · NEWExplore this court's full context
FY20260.0%Small sample1010.0%–79.3%
FY2025Not calculable000Not calculable
FY2021Not calculable000Not calculable
Hartford · HARExplore this court's full context
FY2024Not calculable000Not calculable
FY2022100.0%Small sample22034.2%–100.0%
FY2021Not calculable000Not calculable
Pearsall · PSDExplore this court's full context
FY2021100.0%Small sample11020.7%–100.0%
San Diego · SNDExplore this court's full context
FY20200.0%Small sample1010.0%–79.3%
Elizabeth · ELZExplore this court's full context
FY20190.0%Small sample4040.0%–49.0%
Cleveland · CLEExplore this court's full context
FY20190.0%Small sample1010.0%–79.3%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-09-30 · eoir-2026-09-case-v1 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups show FY2026 first and retain historical counts. These are proceeding records, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2026 and historical fiscal years
Recorded nationalityRecorded grant share · FY2026Total (N)Court · same nationalityFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Boston · BOS
Brazil0.0%Small sample759.2% · N 8180 / 7511 / 8918 / 705 / 664 / 260 / 4
El Salvador18.5%Small sample277.3% · N 1645 / 2715 / 519 / 114 / 64 / 40 / 8
Guatemala5.6%Small sample1811.4% · N 1581 / 1810 / 353 / 79 / 194 / 81 / 8
Honduras17.6%Small sample1710.6% · N 853 / 176 / 162 / 34 / 76 / 130 / 0
Colombia0.0%Small sample912.9% · N 1320 / 96 / 110 / 00 / 10 / 00 / 0
Ecuador0.0%Small sample814.5% · N 1240 / 87 / 183 / 80 / 23 / 40 / 2
Haiti12.5%Small sample813.3% · N 981 / 80 / 41 / 30 / 02 / 20 / 1
Russia100.0%Small sample8100.0% · N 178 / 80 / 10 / 00 / 0——
Peru14.3%Small sample713.3% · N 301 / 70 / 00 / 10 / 01 / 1—
Egypt80.0%Small sample566.7% · N 124 / 5—1 / 1—1 / 1—
United Arab Emirates100.0%Small sample5100.0% · N 55 / 5———0 / 0—
Lebanon100.0%Small sample4100.0% · N 44 / 4—1 / 21 / 10 / 0—
Dominican Republic0.0%Small sample40.0% · N 220 / 40 / 20 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 3
Nicaragua0.0%Small sample328.6% · N 70 / 31 / 16 / 70 / 00 / 0—
Venezuela0.0%Small sample320.8% · N 240 / 33 / 30 / 01 / 20 / 00 / 0
Angola50.0%Small sample264.3% · N 281 / 21 / 41 / 10 / 24 / 40 / 1
Uganda100.0%Small sample160.0% · N 51 / 13 / 31 / 21 / 12 / 2—
China0.0%Small sample10.0% · N 30 / 11 / 21 / 14 / 40 / 00 / 1
Mexico0.0%Small sample10.0% · N 130 / 12 / 30 / 00 / 10 / 20 / 1
Ethiopia100.0%Small sample1100.0% · N 21 / 11 / 11 / 1———
India0.0%Small sample18.3% · N 120 / 10 / 00 / 00 / 10 / 00 / 1
Spain0.0%Small sample10.0% · N 60 / 1—0 / 0—0 / 1—
Azerbaijan0.0%Small sample10.0% · N 60 / 10 / 00 / 0—0 / 0—
Belize0.0%Small sample10.0% · N 10 / 1—————
Chile0.0%Small sample10.0% · N 180 / 10 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0—
Cuba100.0%Small sample1100.0% · N 11 / 10 / 00 / 00 / 0——
Portugal0.0%Small sample10.0% · N 220 / 1—————
Ukraine0.0%Small sample10.0% · N 10 / 10 / 00 / 00 / 0—0 / 0
Democratic Republic Of CongoNot calculable075.0% · N 40 / 00 / 10 / 13 / 70 / 0—
NepalNot calculable00.0% · N 10 / 00 / 00 / 02 / 20 / 0—
TurkiyeNot calculable050.0% · N 60 / 00 / 02 / 2———
CongoNot calculable046.7% · N 150 / 00 / 10 / 00 / 0——
Cape VerdeNot calculable0Not calculable · N 00 / 0————0 / 1
ChadNot calculable0Not calculable · N 00 / 0—————
DominicaNot calculable00.0% · N 30 / 0—————
GeorgiaNot calculable0Not calculable · N 00 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 0——
GhanaNot calculable0100.0% · N 10 / 0—0 / 0———
Guinea BissauNot calculable0Not calculable · N 00 / 0—————
IndonesiaNot calculable0Not calculable · N 00 / 0—————
JamaicaNot calculable00.0% · N 40 / 0——0 / 00 / 00 / 1
Kirghizia (Kyrgyzstan)Not calculable0Not calculable · N 00 / 0—————
KuwaitNot calculable0Not calculable · N 00 / 0—————
MoroccoNot calculable0Not calculable · N 00 / 00 / 0————
RomaniaNot calculable0Not calculable · N 00 / 0—0 / 0———
SudanNot calculable0Not calculable · N 00 / 0—————
ThailandNot calculable0Not calculable · N 00 / 0—————
CameroonNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—0 / 01 / 13 / 52 / 20 / 0
RwandaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0———4 / 4——
BangladeshNo stored cell for this period—0.0% · N 1—1 / 2————
BurundiNo stored cell for this period—————1 / 11 / 1—
DjiboutiNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0——0 / 02 / 2——
GuineaNo stored cell for this period—0.0% · N 2—1 / 10 / 1—0 / 0—
KenyaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0———2 / 2——
SyriaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0——1 / 10 / 1——
BelarusNo stored cell for this period—————1 / 1——
Burma (Myanmar)No stored cell for this period—————0 / 01 / 1—
Former Countries (UR)No stored cell for this period————1 / 1———
IrelandNo stored cell for this period—0.0% · N 3——0 / 1———
LibyaNo stored cell for this period———0 / 1————
Moldavia (Moldova)No stored cell for this period—0.0% · N 1——1 / 1———
PakistanNo stored cell for this period—0.0% · N 2—1 / 10 / 0—0 / 00 / 0
Stateless - Alien Unable To Name A CountryNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0——1 / 1———
AfghanistanNo stored cell for this period—100.0% · N 1—0 / 0————
AlbaniaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0———0 / 0——
ArmeniaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—0 / 0————
BoliviaNo stored cell for this period—100.0% · N 1—0 / 0————
CambodiaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—————0 / 0
CanadaNo stored cell for this period—0.0% · N 1——0 / 0———
Comoro IslandsNo stored cell for this period————0 / 0———
Ivory Coast (Cote D'Ivoire)No stored cell for this period—————0 / 0——
JordanNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—0 / 0————
LiberiaNo stored cell for this period————0 / 0—0 / 00 / 1
MauritaniaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—0 / 00 / 0———
NigeriaNo stored cell for this period—100.0% · N 2—0 / 00 / 0———
PanamaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0——0 / 00 / 0——
SenegalNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—0 / 0————
SomaliaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0———0 / 0—0 / 0
TurkmenistanNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—0 / 0————
UruguayNo stored cell for this period————0 / 0———
UzbekistanNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0——0 / 0—0 / 0—
YemenNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—0 / 0————
ZimbabweNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0——0 / 00 / 0——
Newark
Brazil0.0%Small sample10.0% · N 2880 / 1————0 / 0
EcuadorNo stored cell for this period—0.1% · N 1,058—0 / 0————
Baltimore
El SalvadorNo stored cell for this period—3.4% · N 379——0 / 0———
Buffalo
EcuadorNo stored cell for this period—0.6% · N 170——0 / 0———
Chelmsford · CHE
BrazilNot calculable07.9% · N 2030 / 00 / 0————
Dominican RepublicNot calculable00.0% · N 320 / 0—————
GuatemalaNot calculable09.5% · N 1470 / 00 / 0————
Charlotte
BrazilNo stored cell for this period—0.3% · N 311———0 / 0——
ColombiaNo stored cell for this period—2.3% · N 469—0 / 0————
NicaraguaNo stored cell for this period—5.2% · N 233—0 / 0————
Cleveland
Dallas
VenezuelaNot calculable02.5% · N 1,9310 / 0—————
El SalvadorNo stored cell for this period—1.0% · N 600———0 / 0——
Eloy
BrazilNo stored cell for this period—0.0% · N 3————0 / 0—
El Paso
GuatemalaNo stored cell for this period—2.0% · N 50—————0 / 0
HaitiNo stored cell for this period—0.0% · N 2———0 / 0——
Elizabeth
Hartford
BrazilNo stored cell for this period—0.0% · N 60——0 / 0—2 / 20 / 0
Harlingen
El SalvadorNo stored cell for this period—0.0% · N 20—————0 / 0
Houston - Jefferson Street Immigration Court
VenezuelaNot calculable04.0% · N 5790 / 0—————
Houston – S. Gessner Road
MozambiqueNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0——0 / 0———
Kansas City
Chelmsford · LOW
BrazilNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0——0 / 0———
ChileNo stored cell for this period————0 / 0———
ColombiaNo stored cell for this period————0 / 0———
MauritaniaNo stored cell for this period————0 / 0———
Miami · MIA
ChileNo stored cell for this period—0.0% · N 171——0 / 00 / 00 / 0—
HaitiNo stored cell for this period—0.4% · N 249—0 / 00 / 0———
New York - Federal Plaza
BangladeshNo stored cell for this period—5.9% · N 476—0 / 0————
HaitiNo stored cell for this period—0.0% · N 180—0 / 0————
VenezuelaNo stored cell for this period—2.0% · N 1,511———0 / 0——
Orlando
VenezuelaNo stored cell for this period—8.0% · N 1,185——0 / 0———
Los Fresnos · PIS
Portland · POO
ChileNo stored cell for this period———————0 / 0
Pearsall
EcuadorNo stored cell for this period—0.0% · N 25—————1 / 1
San Antonio
AngolaNo stored cell for this period—33.3% · N 3————0 / 0—
ColombiaNo stored cell for this period—3.2% · N 186——0 / 0———
Santa Ana
RussiaNo stored cell for this period—33.9% · N 292——0 / 0———
San Diego

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no stored cell. A zero denominator cannot give a share.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-09-case-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Boston · BOS · All proceedings · 2026-10–2029-09

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-10–2029-09 (36 months)

Same count scale for both hearing types. Browse horizontally to see all 36 months.

Proceedings

Master Calendar Hearings

Individual / Merits Hearings

Months with no retained records show 0.

Retained schedule records exist outside the displayed months.

Monthly counts are available for all recorded courts below.

Boston · BOS

Monthly counts

John M. Furlong Jr. · JMF · Boston · BOS · 2026-10–2029-09 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-09 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-109144343938
2026-115244023031
2026-12190348626
2027-013541818916
2027-022791614014
2027-032242412721
2027-042871917513
2027-052061310512
2027-061971510913
2027-073691719214
2027-08129217221
2027-0944172014
2027-10104744471
2027-11159618152
2027-12126676961
2028-0183515342
2028-02154529442
2028-032446412358
2028-04110716860
2028-0554844475
2028-06084072
2028-07055048
2028-08084066
2028-09082075
2028-10126847878
2028-112964216736
2028-12060052
2029-01073053
2029-02050040
2029-03066055
2029-04066059
2029-05051036
2029-06051041
2029-07059043
2029-08064050
2029-09047043

Retained: 7,148Excluded: 2,917Unable to confirm: 5Source files and checks

Elizabeth · ELZ

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

LaSalle · JNA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Newark · NEW

Monthly counts

John M. Furlong Jr. · JMF · Newark · NEW · 2026-10–2029-09 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-09 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-100000
2026-110000
2026-120000
2027-010000
2027-020000
2027-030000
2027-040000
2027-050000
2027-060000
2027-070000
2027-0823060
2027-090000
2027-100000
2027-110000
2027-120000
2028-010000
2028-020000
2028-030000
2028-040000
2028-050000
2028-060000
2028-070000
2028-080000
2028-090000
2028-100000
2028-110000
2028-120000
2029-010000
2029-020000
2029-030000
2029-040000
2029-050000
2029-060000
2029-070000
2029-080000
2029-090000

Retained: 23Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Philadelphia · PHI

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-09-30 · eoir-2026-09-case-v1 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code · FY2026

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-09 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Decision FY2026 · respondent-filed appeals (A)

Denominator: respondent-filed BIA IJ Case Appeal events with an exact proceeding link and stored judge code, with a recorded disposition during the displayed period.

Respondent-filed recorded BIA appeal events · FY2026
Appeal events (denominator)DIS · recorded dismissal/affirmanceREM · remand as recordedSUS · appeal sustained as recordedOther · mixed recorded dispositions
30160014

Small sample: N is below 100. Counts remain visible; a few events can change the pattern substantially.

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 215 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code JMF at Boston · BOS in FY2026, 36 were grants (16.7%) and 179 were denials (83.3%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 7 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Where does this judge hear cases now?

EOIR’s official hearing directory, checked 2026-10-24, lists this name at Boston · BOS.

Under this judge code, the 2026-09 EOIR edition records hearing dates from 2026-10 to 2029-09 at Boston · BOS: 5,173 master and 1,819 individual proceedings.

A listing or a scheduled date does not establish a sole duty station.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-09-case-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

22,694Associated proceeding records
11,849Proceedings linked to asylum applications
4,784Eligible dated asylum records
954Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
26
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY1995
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2026
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 7,053 eligible asylum records have no completion date.
  • 7,769 eligible asylum records have no application result; 769 of them appear in the dated list. 7,000 records lack both a usable completion date and an application result. The missing-date and missing-result counts overlap.
  • 12 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-09-30. FY2026 spans its complete fiscal-year calendar; reporting may be incomplete and later revised. Earlier stored dates do not prove service dates or decision authorship.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

11,837 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

On the checked official listing

An official listing may include supervisory or multiple-court assignments; it does not establish a sole duty station.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-09 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-09-30. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-09-30

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Boston · BOS

Retained: 7,148Excluded: 2,917Unable to confirm: 5

Raw Master and Individual records
10,070
Unconfirmed proportion
<0.1%
Recorded handling reason
2,917
Inconsistent case links
1
Multiple future records without a handling reason
4
Historical schedule records
50,883
Future schedule records
10,073
Other schedule types
1,206
Retained records outside the displayed range
156
Reliable asylum association
36,285
No identifiable asylum association
24,670
Unlinked asylum records
1
Schedule and proceeding judge codes differ
2
Update precedes entry date
2

Elizabeth

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
164
Other schedule types
50
Reliable asylum association
63
No identifiable asylum association
101

LaSalle

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
49
Other schedule types
1
Reliable asylum association
5
No identifiable asylum association
44

Newark

Retained: 23Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
23
Unconfirmed proportion
0.0%
Future schedule records
23
Reliable asylum association
6
No identifiable asylum association
17

Philadelphia

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
15
Reliable asylum association
7
No identifiable asylum association
8

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
16
Other schedule types
16
No identifiable asylum association
16

Pearsall

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
37
Other schedule types
37
No identifiable asylum association
37
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These counts describe the selected disposition period. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 31,264 · Linked to a stored judge code: 31,252.

Respondent-filed source events: 29,285 · Linked to a stored judge code: 29,275 · Published respondent-filed events: 29,088 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 187.

Judge code: JMF · Stored source field: saved IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: disposition_fy · Historical period: 2025-10-01–2026-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-09-30.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY1995–FY2026

Source edition2026-09

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Fiscal years offered on web pagesFY2021–FY2026

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Judge John M. Furlong Jr. · Boston Immigration Court asylum records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/john-m-furlong-jr-jmf Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge