AsylumCompass
Saved
English

This historical identity has not been confirmed. Records cannot be attributed to this person.

In FY2025, 2 of 20 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code JSI at Atlanta - W. Peachtree Street were grants (10.00%) and 18 were denials (90.00%). That year, the court recorded 4.84% and the national figure was 23.13%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Atlanta - W. Peachtree Street · ATL

Grants 2 · Denials 18 · N 20
95% interval: 2.79%–30.10%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

Judge code JSI
10.00%N 20
Atlanta - W. Peachtree Street
4.84%N 2,543
United States · all courts
23.13%N 124,581

Among comparable judge codes at this court

This figure has fewer than 100 grant-or-denial records, so it is not placed among comparable judge codes.

Record coverage
10 courts with recordsFY2019–FY2025 · 17 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · not on the official listing checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Atlanta - W. Peachtree Street

0%25%50%75%100%FY2023FY2024FY2025100.00%18.75%10.00%23.81%23.69%4.84%47.28%43.52%23.13%
  • Judge code JSI
  • Atlanta - W. Peachtree Street
  • United States · all courts
A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Atlanta - W. Peachtree Street · ATLExplore this court's full context
FY202510.00%Small sample202182.79%–30.10%
FY202418.75%Small sample163136.59%–43.01%
FY2023100.00%Small sample44051.01%–100.00%
Aurora · AURExplore this court's full context
FY20256.45%Small sample312291.79%–20.72%
Phoenix · PHOExplore this court's full context
FY202333.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%
FY202216.07%Small sample569478.69%–27.81%
FY202141.67%Small sample125719.33%–68.05%
FY20207.41%Small sample544502.92%–17.55%
FY20190.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
New York - Federal Plaza · NYCExplore this court's full context
FY202344.44%Small sample1881024.56%–66.28%
Hartford · HARExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Atlanta – Ted Turner Drive · ATDExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Florence · FLOExplore this court's full context
FY20210.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY202033.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%
Harlingen · HLGExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Tucson · TUCExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Eloy · ELOExplore this court's full context
FY2020100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationalityFY2021–FY2025 · pooledTotal (N)Court · same nationalityFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Phoenix
Mexico0.00%Small sample221.63% · N 1,286———0 / 180 / 4
Guatemala0.00%Small sample152.44% · N 698——0 / 10 / 120 / 2
Romania0.00%Small sample819.05% · N 84———0 / 8—
El Salvador60.00%Small sample53.92% · N 153———3 / 5—
Lebanon100.00%Small sample471.43% · N 7————4 / 4
Nicaragua50.00%Small sample435.82% · N 134———2 / 4—
Venezuela100.00%Small sample250.98% · N 410———1 / 11 / 1
China100.00%Small sample154.55% · N 33———1 / 1—
Cuba100.00%Small sample144.74% · N 152———1 / 1—
India0.00%Small sample19.09% · N 22———0 / 1—
Iran100.00%Small sample194.44% · N 18——1 / 1——
Iraq0.00%Small sample161.36% · N 44———0 / 1—
Kenya0.00%Small sample154.29% · N 35——0 / 1——
Nigeria0.00%Small sample150.00% · N 28———0 / 1—
Sierra Leone0.00%Small sample133.33% · N 3————0 / 1
Sri Lanka0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1———0 / 1—
Tanzania0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 2———0 / 1—
Tunisia100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 1———1 / 1—
Atlanta - W. Peachtree Street
Honduras0.00%Small sample76.43% · N 6380 / 60 / 1———
Nicaragua14.29%Small sample719.67% · N 4781 / 20 / 5———
Russia0.00%Small sample546.43% · N 560 / 5————
Guatemala50.00%Small sample45.44% · N 790—2 / 4———
Colombia0.00%Small sample35.99% · N 4340 / 3————
El Salvador0.00%Small sample38.63% · N 452—0 / 3———
Venezuela100.00%Small sample323.27% · N 808——3 / 3——
Mexico0.00%Small sample23.51% · N 9970 / 10 / 1———
Turkiye50.00%Small sample246.51% · N 43—0 / 11 / 1——
Belarus100.00%Small sample187.50% · N 81 / 1————
India0.00%Small sample112.00% · N 1500 / 1————
Senegal0.00%Small sample114.08% · N 710 / 1————
Uzbekistan100.00%Small sample150.00% · N 2—1 / 1———
Aurora
Georgia0.00%Small sample730.30% · N 330 / 7————
India0.00%Small sample48.00% · N 250 / 4————
Chad0.00%Small sample323.08% · N 130 / 3————
Mexico0.00%Small sample31.73% · N 1730 / 3————
Morocco0.00%Small sample214.29% · N 140 / 2————
Nigeria50.00%Small sample225.00% · N 81 / 2————
Colombia0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 230 / 1————
Egypt0.00%Small sample111.76% · N 170 / 1————
El Salvador0.00%Small sample14.35% · N 460 / 1————
Jordan0.00%Small sample128.57% · N 70 / 1————
Kazakhstan0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 30 / 1————
Kirghizia (Kyrgyzstan)100.00%Small sample128.57% · N 141 / 1————
Mauritania0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 90 / 1————
Pakistan0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 10 / 1————
Somalia0.00%Small sample130.00% · N 100 / 1————
Stateless - Alien Unable To Name A Country0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 20 / 1————
New York - Federal Plaza
Unknown Nationality0.00%Small sample412.50% · N 8——0 / 4——
China66.67%Small sample384.26% · N 8,089——2 / 3——
Bangladesh50.00%Small sample281.73% · N 2,118——1 / 2——
Guatemala0.00%Small sample258.87% · N 586——0 / 2——
Uzbekistan100.00%Small sample267.12% · N 441——2 / 2——
Venezuela100.00%Small sample248.38% · N 494——2 / 2——
Ecuador0.00%Small sample129.80% · N 1,067——0 / 1——
Georgia100.00%Small sample181.98% · N 455——1 / 1——
India0.00%Small sample166.19% · N 3,830——0 / 1——
Hartford
Guatemala0.00%Small sample231.99% · N 497——0 / 2——
Atlanta – Ted Turner Drive
Guatemala0.00%Small sample15.00% · N 40——0 / 1——
Florence
Cuba0.00%Small sample117.39% · N 46————0 / 1

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Atlanta – Ted Turner Drive · ATD · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Atlanta – Ted Turner Drive · ATD

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Atlanta - W. Peachtree Street · ATL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Aurora · AUR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Conroe · CIC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Eloy · ELO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

El Paso · ELP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Florence · FLO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Hartford · HAR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Houston – Greenspoint Park · HGP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

LaSalle · JNA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Laredo · LRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New York - Federal Plaza · NYC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Omaha · OMA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Phoenix · PHO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Stewart · SDC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Tucson · TUC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

Denominator: respondent-filed BIA IJ Case Appeal events with an exact proceeding link and stored judge code, with a recorded disposition during the displayed period.

Respondent-filed recorded BIA appeal events during FY2021–FY2025
Appeal events (denominator)DIS · recorded dismissal/affirmanceREM · remand as recordedSUS · appeal sustained as recordedOther · mixed recorded dispositions
107277073

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 20 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code JSI at Atlanta - W. Peachtree Street in FY2025, 2 were grants (10.00%) and 18 were denials (90.00%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 10 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

6,934Associated proceeding records
1,364Proceedings linked to asylum applications
1,242Eligible dated asylum records
228Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
14
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY2013
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2026 · Partial year
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 121 eligible asylum records have no completion date.
  • 198 eligible asylum records have no application result; 82 of them appear in the dated list. 116 records lack both a usable completion date and an application result. The missing-date and missing-result counts overlap.
  • 1 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

1,363 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

Not on the checked official listing

The checked listing does not establish why this name is absent or where this person works now.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Atlanta – Ted Turner Drive

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
3,167
Other schedule types
3
Reliable asylum association
553
No identifiable asylum association
2,614

Atlanta - W. Peachtree Street

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
9,008
Reliable asylum association
3,515
No identifiable asylum association
5,493

Aurora

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,007
Other schedule types
63
Reliable asylum association
362
No identifiable asylum association
645

Conroe

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
371
Other schedule types
370
No identifiable asylum association
371

Eloy

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
21
Other schedule types
5
Reliable asylum association
6
No identifiable asylum association
15

El Paso

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
3
Other schedule types
3
No identifiable asylum association
3

Florence

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
21
Other schedule types
2
Reliable asylum association
9
No identifiable asylum association
12

Hartford

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
79
Reliable asylum association
61
No identifiable asylum association
18

Houston – Greenspoint Park

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
97
Other schedule types
97
No identifiable asylum association
97

LaSalle

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
34
Other schedule types
34
No identifiable asylum association
34

Laredo

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
138
Other schedule types
138
No identifiable asylum association
138

New York - Federal Plaza

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
200
Reliable asylum association
153
No identifiable asylum association
47

Omaha

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
34
Reliable asylum association
24
No identifiable asylum association
10

Phoenix

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
11,298
Other schedule types
5
Reliable asylum association
5,465
No identifiable asylum association
5,833

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
6
Other schedule types
6
No identifiable asylum association
6

Pearsall

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1
Other schedule types
1
No identifiable asylum association
1

Stewart

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
304
Other schedule types
173
Reliable asylum association
18
No identifiable asylum association
286

Tucson

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
38
Other schedule types
17
Reliable asylum association
5
No identifiable asylum association
33
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: JSI · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY2013–FY2026 · Partial year: FY2026

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Joseph S. Imburgia: historical immigration judge code records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/joseph-s-imburgia-jsi Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge