AsylumCompass
Saved
English

This historical identity has not been confirmed. Records cannot be attributed to this person.

From FY2021 to FY2025, 78 of 235 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code LOC at San Diego were grants (33.19%) and 157 were denials (66.81%). In the same years, the court recorded 42.03% and the national figure was 37.33%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · San Diego · SND

Grants 78 · Denials 157 · N 235
95% interval: 27.48%–39.44%

Judge code LOC
33.19%N 235
San Diego
42.03%N 2,955
United States · all courts
37.33%N 367,995

Among comparable judge codes at this court

13 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2021–FY2025. Their recorded grant shares range from 9.00% to 61.08%; the median is 46.48%.
Record coverage
8 courts with recordsFY1985–FY2024 · 48 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · not on the official listing checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at San Diego

0%25%50%75%100%FY2015FY2016FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024100.00%0.00%0.00%5.79%13.33%25.00%30.88%35.38%40.74%34.78%34.87%23.98%13.32%10.19%9.01%36.33%44.85%57.14%56.32%37.13%46.12%47.28%43.52%
  • Judge code LOC
  • San Diego
  • United States · all courts
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
San Diego · SNDExplore this court's full context
FY202440.74%Small sample54223228.68%–54.03%
FY202335.38%Small sample65234224.88%–47.52%
FY202230.88%Small sample68214721.17%–42.64%
FY202125.00%Small sample48123614.92%–38.78%
FY202013.33%Small sample608526.91%–24.17%
FY20195.79%12171142.83%–11.46%
FY20180.00%Small sample110110.00%–25.88%
FY20170.00%Small sample100100.00%–27.75%
FY2015100.00%Small sample44051.01%–100.00%
FY20110.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20050.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20040.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Otay Mesa · OTMExplore this court's full context
FY202120.00%Small sample5143.62%–62.45%
FY202030.00%Small sample103710.78%–60.32%
Oakdale · OAKExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample606<0.01%–39.03%
West Los Angeles Immigration Court · WLAExplore this court's full context
FY201911.11%Small sample455404.84%–23.50%
FY20181.04%19321910.28%–3.70%
FY20174.44%Small sample904861.74%–10.88%
FY201616.00%Small sample508428.34%–28.51%
FY201513.51%Small sample375325.91%–27.98%
FY201418.87%Small sample53104310.59%–31.36%
FY201328.87%Small sample97286920.79%–38.55%
FY201230.23%129399022.97%–38.63%
FY201144.44%Small sample54243032.00%–57.62%
FY201014.29%Small sample7162.57%–51.31%
FY20090.00%Small sample4040.00%–48.99%
FY20060.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY20050.00%Small sample4040.00%–48.99%
FY20040.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20030.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY20020.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY20000.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19990.00%Small sample606<0.01%–39.03%
FY19980.00%Small sample8080.00%–32.44%
FY19970.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
FY19960.00%Small sample100100.00%–27.75%
FY19950.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY19930.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19920.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19900.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY19880.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19850.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Adelanto · ADLExplore this court's full context
FY201725.00%Small sample8267.15%–59.07%
FY20160.00%Small sample24024<0.01%–13.80%
Los Fresnos · PISExplore this court's full context
FY20150.00%Small sample8080.00%–32.44%
Los Angeles – N. Los Angeles Street · NLAExplore this court's full context
FY20150.00%Small sample4040.00%–48.99%
FY20140.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Pearsall · PSDExplore this court's full context
FY20150.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationalityFY2021–FY2025 · pooledTotal (N)Court · same nationalityFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
San Diego
Guatemala0.00%Small sample5513.67% · N 512—0 / 20 / 130 / 210 / 19
Mexico0.00%Small sample5311.98% · N 409—0 / 190 / 60 / 130 / 15
Russia81.25%Small sample1687.47% · N 375—7 / 92 / 32 / 22 / 2
Iraq46.15%Small sample1381.91% · N 94—0 / 44 / 42 / 5—
Honduras8.33%Small sample1234.41% · N 93—1 / 30 / 60 / 20 / 1
Iran100.00%Small sample785.45% · N 55—1 / 14 / 42 / 2—
Belarus100.00%Small sample694.74% · N 19————6 / 6
Colombia83.33%Small sample626.90% · N 145—5 / 6———
Eritrea100.00%Small sample677.78% · N 27—6 / 6———
India100.00%Small sample643.59% · N 39——4 / 42 / 2—
Cameroon80.00%Small sample575.86% · N 29——1 / 23 / 3—
El Salvador0.00%Small sample527.78% · N 72——0 / 20 / 3—
Nicaragua40.00%Small sample550.44% · N 113—0 / 12 / 30 / 1—
Vietnam80.00%Small sample557.50% · N 40——0 / 14 / 4—
China50.00%Small sample446.99% · N 83—2 / 2—0 / 10 / 1
Ghana75.00%Small sample452.38% · N 21——2 / 21 / 2—
Pakistan50.00%Small sample457.14% · N 7——0 / 11 / 21 / 1
Bangladesh0.00%Small sample330.00% · N 10——0 / 20 / 1—
Haiti0.00%Small sample327.20% · N 125——0 / 3——
Armenia100.00%Small sample281.82% · N 11——1 / 11 / 1—
Angola100.00%Small sample162.50% · N 8————1 / 1
Belize100.00%Small sample150.00% · N 2———1 / 1—
Cambodia100.00%Small sample166.67% · N 3——1 / 1——
Egypt100.00%Small sample147.37% · N 19———1 / 1—
Ethiopia0.00%Small sample167.57% · N 37——0 / 1——
Guadeloupe0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 2——0 / 1——
Guinea0.00%Small sample150.00% · N 14——0 / 1——
Jamaica100.00%Small sample144.44% · N 9——1 / 1——
Nigeria100.00%Small sample141.67% · N 12———1 / 1—
Palestine100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 1————1 / 1
Peru0.00%Small sample118.75% · N 48——0 / 1——
Saudi Arabia100.00%Small sample150.00% · N 2————1 / 1
Turkiye0.00%Small sample143.75% · N 48—0 / 1———
Uzbekistan0.00%Small sample140.00% · N 5——0 / 1——
Venezuela100.00%Small sample136.89% · N 122——1 / 1——
Otay Mesa
Mexico0.00%Small sample21.49% · N 201————0 / 2
China100.00%Small sample133.33% · N 39————1 / 1
Guatemala0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 43————0 / 1
Mauritania0.00%Small sample157.14% · N 7————0 / 1

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Adelanto · ADL · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Adelanto · ADL

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Eloy · ELO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Honolulu · HON

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Angeles – N. Los Angeles Street · NLA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Oakdale · OAK

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Otay Mesa · OTM

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

San Diego · SND

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

West Los Angeles Immigration Court · WLA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

Denominator: respondent-filed BIA IJ Case Appeal events with an exact proceeding link and stored judge code, with a recorded disposition during the displayed period.

Respondent-filed recorded BIA appeal events during FY2021–FY2025
Appeal events (denominator)DIS · recorded dismissal/affirmanceREM · remand as recordedSUS · appeal sustained as recordedOther · mixed recorded dispositions
409251490109

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 235 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code LOC at San Diego in FY2021–FY2025, 78 were grants (33.19%) and 157 were denials (66.81%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 8 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

12,948Associated proceeding records
4,210Proceedings linked to asylum applications
4,208Eligible dated asylum records
1,322Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
11
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY1985
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2024
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 130 eligible asylum records have no application result; 130 of them appear in the dated list.
  • 2 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

4,208 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

Not on the checked official listing

The checked listing does not establish why this name is absent or where this person works now.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Adelanto · ADL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,087
Other schedule types
289
Reliable asylum association
485
No identifiable asylum association
602

Eloy

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
2
Other schedule types
2
No identifiable asylum association
2

Honolulu

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
2
Other schedule types
1
Reliable asylum association
2

Los Angeles – N. Los Angeles Street

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
66
Other schedule types
19
Reliable asylum association
13
No identifiable asylum association
53

Oakdale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
112
Other schedule types
49
Reliable asylum association
41
No identifiable asylum association
71

Otay Mesa

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
446
Other schedule types
185
Reliable asylum association
134
No identifiable asylum association
312

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
44
Other schedule types
9
Reliable asylum association
18
No identifiable asylum association
26

Pearsall

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
98
Other schedule types
36
Reliable asylum association
26
No identifiable asylum association
72

San Diego

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
22,124
Other schedule types
28
Reliable asylum association
8,000
No identifiable asylum association
14,124

West Los Angeles Immigration Court · WLA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
22,584
Other schedule types
13
Reliable asylum association
13,040
No identifiable asylum association
9,544
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: LOC · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY1985–FY2024

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Lee O'Connor: historical immigration judge code records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/lee-o-connor-loc Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge