AsylumCompass
Saved
English

From FY2021 to FY2025, 623 of 816 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code MMF at New York - Federal Plaza were grants (76.35%) and 193 were denials (23.65%). In the same years, the court recorded 73.43% and the national figure was 37.33%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · New York - Federal Plaza · NYC

Grants 623 · Denials 193 · N 816
95% interval: 73.31%–79.14%

Judge code MMF
76.35%N 816
New York - Federal Plaza
73.43%N 26,513
United States · all courts
37.33%N 367,995

Among comparable judge codes at this court

47 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2021–FY2025. Their recorded grant shares range from 27.01% to 91.94%; the median is 77.03%.
FY2026 so far
16.09%317 records through 2026-08-31 · court: 7.23%
Record coverage
4 courts with recordsFY1994–FY2026 · 30 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Hearing dates on calendar
954 master · 1,918 individualNew York - Federal Plaza · proceedings with hearing dates, 2026-09–2029-08Hearing schedule
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · official listing: New York - Federal Plaza, checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at New York - Federal Plaza

0%25%50%75%100%FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY20260.00%42.86%47.83%45.59%59.09%83.33%82.01%85.84%60.08%16.09%79.19%66.98%57.40%49.07%76.24%80.19%81.89%78.47%51.37%7.23%37.13%46.12%47.28%43.52%23.13%
  • Judge code MMF
  • New York - Federal Plaza
  • United States · all courts
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
New York - Federal Plaza · NYCExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year16.09%3175126612.45%–20.54%
FY202560.08%2381439553.75%–66.10%
FY202485.84%2191883180.61%–89.85%
FY202382.01%1391142574.80%–87.51%
FY202283.33%1981653377.52%–87.88%
FY202159.09%Small sample2213938.73%–76.74%
FY202045.59%136627437.45%–53.97%
FY201947.83%39118720442.92%–52.77%
FY201842.86%Small sample73415.82%–74.95%
FY20170.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20130.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY2012100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
FY20110.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY2009100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
FY2008100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
FY2005100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
FY20040.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20030.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20010.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19990.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY19980.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY19970.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY19960.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
FY19950.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY19940.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
New York - Broadway · NYBExplore this court's full context
FY20250.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY2020100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
New York - Varick · NYVExplore this court's full context
FY2023100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
FY20190.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Miami · MIAExplore this court's full context
FY20080.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationalityFY2021–FY2025 · pooledTotal (N)Court · same nationalityFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
New York - Federal Plaza
China87.59%27484.26% · N 8,08976 / 9357 / 6133 / 3569 / 805 / 5
India55.14%10766.19% · N 3,8307 / 2421 / 3315 / 2213 / 243 / 4
Bangladesh80.00%Small sample8581.73% · N 2,11814 / 3028 / 286 / 720 / 20—
Nepal70.59%Small sample3481.01% · N 1,1434 / 55 / 96 / 78 / 121 / 1
Russia96.43%Small sample2886.94% · N 98810 / 1116 / 16—1 / 1—
El Salvador61.54%Small sample2662.34% · N 1,0862 / 56 / 76 / 82 / 30 / 3
Honduras61.54%Small sample2666.96% · N 1,0083 / 70 / 28 / 105 / 60 / 1
Venezuela55.00%Small sample2048.38% · N 4942 / 91 / 34 / 44 / 4—
Albania94.44%Small sample1887.47% · N 4395 / 54 / 4—8 / 9—
Ecuador50.00%Small sample1629.80% · N 1,0670 / 64 / 43 / 40 / 11 / 1
Uzbekistan80.00%Small sample1567.12% · N 4410 / 28 / 94 / 4——
Guatemala71.43%Small sample1458.87% · N 5861 / 22 / 33 / 34 / 40 / 2
Georgia84.62%Small sample1381.98% · N 4553 / 43 / 41 / 14 / 4—
Nigeria76.92%Small sample1385.44% · N 2061 / 32 / 24 / 43 / 30 / 1
Kazakhstan100.00%Small sample891.96% · N 112—3 / 34 / 41 / 1—
Mauritania25.00%Small sample832.50% · N 1600 / 31 / 3—1 / 2—
Pakistan62.50%Small sample879.50% · N 3611 / 24 / 40 / 10 / 1—
Azerbaijan100.00%Small sample781.58% · N 38———4 / 43 / 3
Ukraine100.00%Small sample795.29% · N 170—3 / 3—4 / 4—
Burkina Faso83.33%Small sample683.26% · N 2272 / 21 / 12 / 3——
Colombia100.00%Small sample532.83% · N 3294 / 4——1 / 1—
Former Countries (UR)100.00%Small sample591.98% · N 374—1 / 12 / 22 / 2—
Kosovo100.00%Small sample585.00% · N 160——3 / 32 / 2—
Guinea75.00%Small sample465.41% · N 1851 / 2—1 / 11 / 1—
Nicaragua25.00%Small sample468.38% · N 1170 / 3——1 / 1—
Yemen100.00%Small sample480.00% · N 30—1 / 13 / 3——
Gambia66.67%Small sample375.00% · N 32—1 / 10 / 11 / 1—
Mexico66.67%Small sample332.50% · N 1601 / 2——1 / 1—
Sri Lanka33.33%Small sample362.31% · N 1300 / 1—1 / 10 / 1—
Turkiye66.67%Small sample369.61% · N 102—2 / 3———
Belarus50.00%Small sample296.84% · N 950 / 11 / 1———
Bhutan0.00%Small sample259.09% · N 22——0 / 2——
Egypt100.00%Small sample284.68% · N 111—2 / 2———
Ghana100.00%Small sample276.09% · N 46——1 / 11 / 1—
Guyana0.00%Small sample250.00% · N 80 / 2————
Haiti100.00%Small sample248.68% · N 76——1 / 11 / 1—
Iran100.00%Small sample288.89% · N 9—2 / 2———
Malaysia0.00%Small sample255.56% · N 9——0 / 2——
Mali0.00%Small sample278.43% · N 51——0 / 2——
Mongolia100.00%Small sample2100.00% · N 42 / 2————
Syria100.00%Small sample2100.00% · N 14—2 / 2———
Tajikistan (Tadzhik)0.00%Small sample280.90% · N 890 / 2————
Turkmenistan100.00%Small sample268.18% · N 222 / 2————
Unspecified nationality code100.00%Small sample282.50% · N 40——2 / 2——
Barbados100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 1——1 / 1——
Cameroon100.00%Small sample160.00% · N 25—1 / 1———
Chile100.00%Small sample161.54% · N 13———1 / 1—
Germany100.00%Small sample164.29% · N 281 / 1————
Hong Kong100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 5—1 / 1———
Jamaica100.00%Small sample162.50% · N 72———1 / 1—
Kirghizia (Kyrgyzstan)0.00%Small sample171.05% · N 760 / 1————
Lebanon100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 1—1 / 1———
Mauritius100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 1—1 / 1———
Morocco100.00%Small sample111.11% · N 181 / 1————
Niger100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 6—1 / 1———
Peru0.00%Small sample119.05% · N 126————0 / 1
Philippines100.00%Small sample160.00% · N 5—1 / 1———
Senegal0.00%Small sample135.58% · N 1040 / 1————
United Kingdom100.00%Small sample150.00% · N 4———1 / 1—
Vietnam100.00%Small sample160.00% · N 20—1 / 1———
New York - Broadway
Guinea0.00%Small sample146.80% · N 8740 / 1————
New York - Varick · NYV
India100.00%Small sample157.24% · N 1,153——1 / 1——

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

New York - Federal Plaza · NYC · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Same count scale for both hearing types. Browse horizontally to see all 36 months.

Proceedings

Master Calendar Hearings

Individual / Merits Hearings

Months with no retained records show 0.

Retained schedule records exist outside the displayed months.

Monthly counts are available for all recorded courts below.

Chicago · CHI

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New York - Broadway · NYB

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New York - Federal Plaza · NYC

Monthly counts

Michael G. Mcfarland · MMF · New York - Federal Plaza · NYC · 2026-09–2029-08 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-08 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-0915413347
2026-1025581084
2026-11198148612
2026-12105414238
2027-0187655162
2027-0287885780
2027-0367784473
2027-04044040
2027-05055049
2027-06068059
2027-07038037
2027-08069066
2027-09058049
2027-10071064
2027-11051049
2027-12055050
2028-01047039
2028-02073070
2028-03076069
2028-04046043
2028-05072067
2028-06064058
2028-07027023
2028-08071068
2028-09056055
2028-10067061
2028-11049048
2028-12043040
2029-01078077
2029-02051044
2029-03069067
2029-04039038
2029-05161157
2029-06056049
2029-07025023
2029-08032029

Retained: 2,965Excluded: 871Unable to confirm: 4Source files and checks

New York - Varick · NYV

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Annandale · WAS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

This judge code has an unresolved identity or name association. Its BIA row is unavailable; this is not a zero count.

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 816 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code MMF at New York - Federal Plaza in FY2021–FY2025, 623 were grants (76.35%) and 193 were denials (23.65%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 4 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

Why is FY2026 marked as a partial year?

Fiscal year 2026 runs from 2025-10-01 to 2026-09-30, and the source data end on 2026-08-31. FY2026 figures cover only part of the year, so they are not compared with complete years.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Where does this judge hear cases now?

EOIR’s official hearing directory, checked 2026-09-16, lists this name at New York - Federal Plaza.

Under this judge code, the 2026-08 EOIR edition records hearing dates from 2026-09 to 2029-08 at New York - Federal Plaza: 954 master and 1,918 individual proceedings.

A listing or a scheduled date does not establish a sole duty station.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

13,885Associated proceeding records
8,668Proceedings linked to asylum applications
4,675Eligible dated asylum records
1,701Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
16
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY1993
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2026 · Partial year
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 3,987 eligible asylum records have no completion date.
  • 4,776 eligible asylum records have no application result; 801 of them appear in the dated list. 3,975 records lack both a usable completion date and an application result. The missing-date and missing-result counts overlap.
  • 6 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

8,662 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

On the checked official listing

An official listing may include supervisory or multiple-court assignments; it does not establish a sole duty station.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Chicago

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
7
Reliable asylum association
2
No identifiable asylum association
5

New York - Broadway

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
3
No identifiable asylum association
3

New York - Federal Plaza

Retained: 2,965Excluded: 871Unable to confirm: 4

Raw Master and Individual records
3,840
Unconfirmed proportion
0.10%
Recorded handling reason
869
Recorded proceeding completion
2
Multiple future records without a handling reason
4
Historical schedule records
33,261
Future schedule records
3,848
Other schedule types
33
Retained records outside the displayed range
93
Reliable asylum association
26,968
No identifiable asylum association
10,141
Schedule and proceeding judge codes differ
30

New York - Varick

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
28
Other schedule types
5
Reliable asylum association
16
No identifiable asylum association
12

Annandale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1
Reliable asylum association
1
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: MMF · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY1993–FY2026 · Partial year: FY2026

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Judge Michael G. Mcfarland · New York - Federal Plaza Immigration Court asylum records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/michael-g-mcfarland-mmf Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge