AsylumCompass
Saved
English

From FY2021 to FY2025, 24 of 150 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code NSM at Chelmsford were grants (16.00%) and 126 were denials (84.00%). In the same years, the court recorded 36.03% and the national figure was 37.33%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Chelmsford · CHE

Grants 24 · Denials 126 · N 150
95% interval: 10.99%–22.70%

Judge code NSM
16.00%N 150
Chelmsford
36.03%N 2,026
United States · all courts
37.33%N 367,995

Among comparable judge codes at this court

10 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2021–FY2025. Their recorded grant shares range from 10.79% to 82.39%; the median is 31.17%.
FY2026 so far
6.56%122 records through 2026-08-31 · court: 13.38%
Record coverage
5 courts with recordsFY2018–FY2026 · 8 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Hearing dates on calendar
4,120 master · 1,819 individualChelmsford · proceedings with hearing dates, 2026-09–2029-08Hearing schedule
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · official listing: Chelmsford, checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Chelmsford

0%10%20%30%40%50%FY2025FY202616.00%6.56%35.46%13.38%23.13%
  • Judge code NSM
  • Chelmsford
  • United States · all courts
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Chelmsford · CHEExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year6.56%12281143.36%–12.41%
FY202516.00%1502412610.99%–22.70%
Chelmsford · LOWExplore this court's full context
FY202518.18%Small sample11295.14%–47.70%
FY202444.44%Small sample27121527.59%–62.69%
Boston · BOSExplore this court's full context
FY202428.10%121348720.86%–36.69%
FY20180.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Annandale · WASExplore this court's full context
FY20220.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Newark · NEWExplore this court's full context
FY20220.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationalityFY2021–FY2025 · pooledTotal (N)Court · same nationalityFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Chelmsford · CHE
Guatemala8.33%Small sample2439.05% · N 4202 / 24————
Brazil0.00%Small sample1719.10% · N 5340 / 17————
Ecuador18.75%Small sample1633.08% · N 1333 / 16————
Angola11.11%Small sample959.20% · N 1251 / 9————
Democratic Republic Of Congo77.78%Small sample970.42% · N 717 / 9————
Haiti12.50%Small sample813.04% · N 461 / 8————
Honduras42.86%Small sample736.63% · N 1013 / 7————
Mexico16.67%Small sample65.26% · N 191 / 6————
China25.00%Small sample425.00% · N 121 / 4————
Colombia0.00%Small sample438.64% · N 440 / 4————
El Salvador25.00%Small sample442.28% · N 1231 / 4————
Rwanda0.00%Small sample450.00% · N 140 / 4————
Cape Verde0.00%Small sample30.00% · N 70 / 3————
Congo33.33%Small sample354.55% · N 221 / 3————
Dominican Republic0.00%Small sample318.75% · N 480 / 3————
India0.00%Small sample345.00% · N 200 / 3————
Jamaica0.00%Small sample30.00% · N 120 / 3————
Turkiye0.00%Small sample330.00% · N 200 / 3————
Venezuela0.00%Small sample341.38% · N 290 / 3————
Djibouti0.00%Small sample250.00% · N 60 / 2————
Ghana50.00%Small sample250.00% · N 61 / 2————
Russia0.00%Small sample276.47% · N 170 / 2————
Afghanistan0.00%Small sample166.67% · N 30 / 1————
Ethiopia100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 91 / 1————
Iraq0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 10 / 1————
Kosovo0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 10 / 1————
Liberia0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 20 / 1————
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample140.00% · N 150 / 1————
Poland0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 10 / 1————
Sudan0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 10 / 1————
Tanzania0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 20 / 1————
United Arab Emirates100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 11 / 1————
Vietnam0.00%Small sample140.00% · N 50 / 1————
Boston · BOS
Brazil26.32%Small sample9529.17% · N 5,653—25 / 95———
Unknown Nationality37.50%Small sample859.09% · N 22—3 / 8———
Guatemala0.00%Small sample555.08% · N 1,643—0 / 5———
Dominican Republic0.00%Small sample239.67% · N 121—0 / 2———
Honduras50.00%Small sample258.42% · N 695—1 / 2———
Portugal0.00%Small sample240.00% · N 5—0 / 2———
Russia100.00%Small sample292.11% · N 114—2 / 2———
China100.00%Small sample180.00% · N 85—1 / 1———
Colombia100.00%Small sample138.19% · N 432—1 / 1———
Congo0.00%Small sample183.33% · N 66—0 / 1———
Cuba0.00%Small sample125.00% · N 4—0 / 1———
Turkiye100.00%Small sample179.03% · N 62—1 / 1———
Chelmsford · LOW
Brazil27.78%Small sample1827.54% · N 2070 / 25 / 16———
Guatemala0.00%Small sample553.19% · N 1880 / 5————
Ecuador50.00%Small sample246.15% · N 391 / 2————
Rwanda100.00%Small sample285.71% · N 7—2 / 2———
Angola100.00%Small sample180.85% · N 47—1 / 1———
Burma (Myanmar)0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1—0 / 1———
Cameroon100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 8—1 / 1———
Congo100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 251 / 1————
Democratic Republic Of Congo0.00%Small sample169.70% · N 33—0 / 1———
Kazakhstan0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1—0 / 1———
Mexico0.00%Small sample150.00% · N 2—0 / 1———
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample163.64% · N 110 / 1————
Senegal100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 2—1 / 1———
Uganda100.00%Small sample195.00% · N 20—1 / 1———
Venezuela100.00%Small sample184.21% · N 19—1 / 1———
Newark
Brazil0.00%Small sample116.91% · N 1,354———0 / 1—
Annandale · WAS
Honduras0.00%Small sample137.33% · N 1,626———0 / 1—

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Chelmsford · CHE · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Same count scale for both hearing types. Browse horizontally to see all 36 months.

Proceedings

Master Calendar Hearings

Individual / Merits Hearings

Months with no retained records show 0.

Monthly counts are available for all recorded courts below.

Boston · BOS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Chelmsford · CHE

Monthly counts

Natalie Smith · NSM · Chelmsford · CHE · 2026-09–2029-08 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-08 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-0910852538
2026-10421020
2026-11058049
2026-12034027
2027-01065046
2027-02074067
2027-03085080
2027-041675163
2027-05067049
2027-06234808375
2027-072517719064
2027-08220778763
2027-093377618464
2027-102898314367
2027-112457714870
2027-122377613861
2028-011927910671
2028-022535612741
2028-032807016157
2028-043126017148
2028-052986915260
2028-06173162
2028-0782626753
2028-08158417530
2028-0937141814
2028-10372242
2028-11166111028
2028-12144437438
2029-01108267225
2029-0237571652
2029-0374794165
2029-040000
2029-050000
2029-060000
2029-070000
2029-080000

Retained: 5,939Excluded: 2,576Unable to confirm: 17Source files and checks

Chelmsford · LOW

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

Denominator: respondent-filed BIA IJ Case Appeal events with an exact proceeding link and stored judge code, with a recorded disposition during the displayed period.

Respondent-filed recorded BIA appeal events during FY2021–FY2025
Appeal events (denominator)DIS · recorded dismissal/affirmanceREM · remand as recordedSUS · appeal sustained as recordedOther · mixed recorded dispositions
5143107

Small sample: N is below 100. Counts remain visible; a few events can change the pattern substantially.

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 150 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code NSM at Chelmsford in FY2021–FY2025, 24 were grants (16.00%) and 126 were denials (84.00%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 5 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

Why is FY2026 marked as a partial year?

Fiscal year 2026 runs from 2025-10-01 to 2026-09-30, and the source data end on 2026-08-31. FY2026 figures cover only part of the year, so they are not compared with complete years.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Where does this judge hear cases now?

EOIR’s official hearing directory, checked 2026-09-16, lists this name at Chelmsford.

Under this judge code, the 2026-08 EOIR edition records hearing dates from 2026-09 to 2029-08 at Chelmsford: 4,120 master and 1,819 individual proceedings.

A listing or a scheduled date does not establish a sole duty station.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

10,162Associated proceeding records
5,106Proceedings linked to asylum applications
1,105Eligible dated asylum records
435Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
15
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY2014
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2026 · Partial year
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 3,996 eligible asylum records have no completion date.
  • 4,135 eligible asylum records have no application result; 157 of them appear in the dated list. 3,978 records lack both a usable completion date and an application result. The missing-date and missing-result counts overlap.
  • 5 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

5,101 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

On the checked official listing

An official listing may include supervisory or multiple-court assignments; it does not establish a sole duty station.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Boston · BOS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,877
Reliable asylum association
1,198
No identifiable asylum association
679

Chelmsford

Retained: 5,939Excluded: 2,576Unable to confirm: 17

Raw Master and Individual records
8,532
Unconfirmed proportion
0.20%
Recorded handling reason
2,576
Multiple records for the same proceeding and time
2
Multiple future records without a handling reason
15
Historical schedule records
11,431
Future schedule records
8,565
Other schedule types
1,914
Reliable asylum association
10,299
No identifiable asylum association
9,697
Schedule and proceeding judge codes differ
5

Chelmsford

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
3,848
Other schedule types
138
Reliable asylum association
2,829
No identifiable asylum association
1,019
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: NSM · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY2014–FY2026 · Partial year: FY2026

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Judge Natalie Smith · Chelmsford Immigration Court asylum records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/natalie-smith-nsm Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge