AsylumCompass
Saved
English

From FY2021 to FY2025, 4 of 144 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code NAM at Charlotte were grants (2.78%) and 140 were denials (97.22%). In the same years, the court recorded 11.78% and the national figure was 37.33%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Charlotte · CHL

Grants 4 · Denials 140 · N 144
95% interval: 1.09%–6.92%

Records are counted at the court stored on each proceeding. The official listing names Falls Church Immigration Adjudication Center.

Judge code NAM
2.78%N 144
Charlotte
11.78%N 5,899
United States · all courts
37.33%N 367,995

Among comparable judge codes at this court

20 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2021–FY2025. Their recorded grant shares range from 0.84% to 36.81%; the median is 9.66%.
FY2026 so far
2.54%393 records through 2026-08-31 · court: 4.39%
Record coverage
22 courts with recordsFY1996–FY2026 · 45 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Hearing dates on calendar
0 master · 1 individualAnnandale · proceedings with hearing dates, 2026-09–2029-08Hearing schedule
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · official listing: Falls Church Immigration Adjudication Center, checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Charlotte

0%10%20%30%40%50%FY2025FY20262.78%2.54%7.08%4.39%23.13%
  • Judge code NAM
  • Charlotte
  • United States · all courts
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Charlotte · CHLExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year2.54%393103831.39%–4.62%
FY20252.78%14441401.09%–6.92%
Annandale · ANNExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year5.88%Small sample171161.05%–26.98%
FY202518.18%Small sample224187.31%–38.52%
Miami · KROExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year0.00%Small sample210210.00%–15.46%
Oakdale · OAKExplore this court's full context
FY2025100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
FY202218.18%Small sample11295.14%–47.70%
FY202130.00%Small sample2061414.55%–51.90%
FY202021.74%115259015.18%–30.12%
Annandale · WASExplore this court's full context
FY202525.00%Small sample4134.56%–69.94%
FY202428.13%Small sample3292315.56%–45.37%
FY202334.25%Small sample73254824.39%–45.67%
FY202246.15%Small sample136723.21%–70.86%
FY20210.00%Small sample707<0.01%–35.43%
FY20200.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Hyattsville · HYAExplore this court's full context
FY202526.92%Small sample2671913.70%–46.08%
FY202417.78%Small sample458379.29%–31.33%
Los Fresnos · PEPExplore this court's full context
FY20250.00%Small sample310310.00%–11.03%
Elizabeth · ELZExplore this court's full context
FY20250.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20210.00%Small sample8080.00%–32.44%
LaSalle · JNAExplore this court's full context
FY202516.67%Small sample6153.01%–56.35%
Boston · BOSExplore this court's full context
FY20250.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Pearsall · PSDExplore this court's full context
FY20250.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Sterling · STEExplore this court's full context
FY2024100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
FY20230.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Atlanta - W. Peachtree Street · ATLExplore this court's full context
FY20240.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
West Los Angeles Immigration Court · WLAExplore this court's full context
FY20220.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY20210.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY202017.78%Small sample458379.29%–31.33%
FY201922.58%1553512016.71%–29.78%
FY20120.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20050.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19980.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY19960.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Stewart · SDCExplore this court's full context
FY202250.00%Small sample42215.00%–85.00%
FY202111.11%Small sample9181.99%–43.50%
Fort Snelling · BLMExplore this court's full context
FY202180.00%Small sample54137.55%–96.38%
FY20205.56%Small sample181170.99%–25.76%
Philadelphia · PHIExplore this court's full context
FY20210.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY20200.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Conroe · CICExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Dallas · DALExplore this court's full context
FY202050.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%
Los Fresnos · PISExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Aurora · AURExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Seattle · SEAExplore this court's full context
FY2019100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationalityFY2021–FY2025 · pooledTotal (N)Court · same nationalityFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Charlotte
Honduras0.00%Small sample357.63% · N 1,5980 / 35————
Mexico0.00%Small sample293.03% · N 8570 / 29————
El Salvador0.00%Small sample1510.08% · N 6150 / 15————
Guatemala7.14%Small sample148.41% · N 7251 / 14————
Brazil0.00%Small sample122.61% · N 4220 / 12————
Colombia0.00%Small sample117.60% · N 3290 / 11————
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample817.20% · N 2500 / 8————
Venezuela0.00%Small sample831.14% · N 4400 / 8————
Russia100.00%Small sample366.00% · N 1003 / 3————
India0.00%Small sample220.00% · N 350 / 2————
Vietnam0.00%Small sample230.00% · N 200 / 2————
Afghanistan0.00%Small sample160.00% · N 50 / 1————
Cuba0.00%Small sample122.73% · N 440 / 1————
Dominica0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 10 / 1————
Dominican Republic0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 70 / 1————
Senegal0.00%Small sample15.88% · N 510 / 1————
Annandale · WAS
El Salvador14.89%Small sample4738.37% · N 2,619—0 / 106 / 291 / 40 / 4
Honduras19.05%Small sample2137.33% · N 1,6260 / 11 / 53 / 140 / 1—
Guatemala13.33%Small sample1530.32% · N 8310 / 10 / 42 / 90 / 1—
Ethiopia90.00%Small sample1087.23% · N 235—1 / 18 / 80 / 1—
China71.43%Small sample783.22% · N 1491 / 1—2 / 42 / 2—
Mexico0.00%Small sample514.02% · N 1070 / 1—0 / 2—0 / 2
Syria100.00%Small sample590.32% · N 31—5 / 5———
Nepal0.00%Small sample366.67% · N 33—0 / 3———
Russia0.00%Small sample389.29% · N 84——0 / 3——
Venezuela100.00%Small sample356.45% · N 186———3 / 3—
Cameroon50.00%Small sample283.95% · N 81——1 / 10 / 1—
Argentina0.00%Small sample150.00% · N 2—0 / 1———
Byelorussia (Belarus)100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 1——1 / 1——
Egypt100.00%Small sample186.27% · N 51—1 / 1———
Eritrea100.00%Small sample180.43% · N 46——1 / 1——
Libya100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 3—1 / 1———
Mauritania100.00%Small sample154.12% · N 85——1 / 1——
Peru0.00%Small sample121.81% · N 243————0 / 1
Turkiye0.00%Small sample178.10% · N 105—0 / 1———
Hyattsville
El Salvador25.00%Small sample2051.06% · N 2,1803 / 42 / 16———
Guatemala0.00%Small sample937.16% · N 8100 / 30 / 6———
Nicaragua22.22%Small sample949.88% · N 4110 / 52 / 4———
Honduras12.50%Small sample835.80% · N 1,0251 / 60 / 2———
Cameroon42.86%Small sample767.97% · N 1,3081 / 32 / 4———
Peru42.86%Small sample724.62% · N 5891 / 12 / 6———
Colombia0.00%Small sample420.59% · N 238—0 / 4———
Mexico0.00%Small sample227.27% · N 132—0 / 2———
Ethiopia0.00%Small sample181.21% · N 4630 / 1————
Haiti0.00%Small sample119.61% · N 51—0 / 1———
Mauritania0.00%Small sample142.86% · N 140 / 1————
Unknown Nationality0.00%Small sample150.00% · N 20 / 1————
Venezuela100.00%Small sample136.44% · N 4611 / 1————
Oakdale
Cuba33.33%Small sample1230.48% · N 105————4 / 12
Nicaragua11.11%Small sample917.12% · N 257———1 / 70 / 2
Cameroon100.00%Small sample337.89% · N 95———1 / 12 / 2
Venezuela0.00%Small sample322.92% · N 144———0 / 20 / 1
China100.00%Small sample14.44% · N 901 / 1————
El Salvador0.00%Small sample15.26% · N 76————0 / 1
Honduras0.00%Small sample11.63% · N 123———0 / 1—
Mexico0.00%Small sample11.32% · N 151————0 / 1
Vietnam0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 25————0 / 1
Los Fresnos · PEP
Colombia0.00%Small sample50.00% · N 450 / 5————
El Salvador0.00%Small sample30.00% · N 400 / 3————
Iran0.00%Small sample319.51% · N 410 / 3————
Venezuela0.00%Small sample34.76% · N 420 / 3————
Democratic Republic Of Congo0.00%Small sample20.00% · N 110 / 2————
Dominican Republic0.00%Small sample20.00% · N 170 / 2————
Congo0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 90 / 1————
Cuba0.00%Small sample111.11% · N 360 / 1————
Egypt0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 120 / 1————
Iraq0.00%Small sample125.00% · N 40 / 1————
Israel0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 20 / 1————
Kazakhstan0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 30 / 1————
Nepal0.00%Small sample133.33% · N 90 / 1————
Nigeria0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 100 / 1————
Pakistan0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 50 / 1————
Peru0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 100 / 1————
Sri Lanka0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 50 / 1————
Sudan0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 10 / 1————
Zimbabwe0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 50 / 1————
Annandale · ANN
Peru0.00%Small sample712.77% · N 5010 / 7————
El Salvador60.00%Small sample521.26% · N 7153 / 5————
Ethiopia0.00%Small sample256.31% · N 1030 / 2————
Guatemala0.00%Small sample215.87% · N 3780 / 2————
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample226.70% · N 2210 / 2————
Bolivia0.00%Small sample112.24% · N 5310 / 1————
Cameroon100.00%Small sample158.82% · N 171 / 1————
China0.00%Small sample148.89% · N 450 / 1————
Honduras0.00%Small sample119.56% · N 7670 / 1————
Stewart
El Salvador25.00%Small sample46.94% · N 72———1 / 20 / 2
Guatemala0.00%Small sample21.22% · N 82———0 / 10 / 1
Honduras0.00%Small sample25.61% · N 107————0 / 2
Belarus0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1————0 / 1
Brazil0.00%Small sample15.56% · N 18————0 / 1
Nicaragua100.00%Small sample119.38% · N 129———1 / 1—
Niger0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1————0 / 1
Russia100.00%Small sample137.70% · N 61————1 / 1
Elizabeth
Guatemala0.00%Small sample25.26% · N 209————0 / 2
El Salvador0.00%Small sample12.61% · N 153————0 / 1
Georgia0.00%Small sample121.43% · N 14————0 / 1
Hungary0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 3————0 / 1
India0.00%Small sample110.71% · N 28————0 / 1
Iran0.00%Small sample157.14% · N 70 / 1————
Mexico0.00%Small sample13.05% · N 164————0 / 1
Nigeria0.00%Small sample13.03% · N 33————0 / 1
Turkiye0.00%Small sample118.18% · N 110 / 1————
LaSalle
Cameroon50.00%Small sample246.28% · N 1211 / 2————
Colombia0.00%Small sample15.26% · N 1330 / 1————
Georgia0.00%Small sample118.27% · N 1040 / 1————
Guatemala0.00%Small sample10.91% · N 1100 / 1————
Somalia0.00%Small sample120.37% · N 540 / 1————
Fort Snelling
Cuba50.00%Small sample236.67% · N 30————1 / 2
Venezuela100.00%Small sample242.62% · N 122————2 / 2
Nicaragua100.00%Small sample120.74% · N 323————1 / 1
West Los Angeles Immigration Court · WLA
Mexico0.00%Small sample212.08% · N 902———0 / 10 / 1
Guatemala0.00%Small sample117.12% · N 993———0 / 1—
Honduras0.00%Small sample118.08% · N 426———0 / 1—
Philadelphia
Dominican Republic0.00%Small sample31.14% · N 88————0 / 3
Sterling · STE
El Salvador0.00%Small sample134.78% · N 1,846——0 / 1——
Honduras0.00%Small sample129.31% · N 1,624——0 / 1——
Nicaragua100.00%Small sample149.88% · N 421—1 / 1———
Atlanta - W. Peachtree Street
Colombia0.00%Small sample15.99% · N 434—0 / 1———
Boston · BOS
Brazil0.00%Small sample129.17% · N 5,6530 / 1————
Pearsall
Vietnam0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 160 / 1————

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Annandale · ANN · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Same count scale for both hearing types. Browse horizontally to see all 36 months.

Proceedings

Master Calendar Hearings · 0 proceedings with recorded hearing dates

Individual / Merits Hearings

Months with no retained records show 0.

Monthly counts are available for all recorded courts below.

Annandale · ANN

Monthly counts

Nicholas A. Martz · NAM · Annandale · ANN · 2026-09–2029-08 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-08 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-090100
2026-100000
2026-110000
2026-120000
2027-010000
2027-020000
2027-030000
2027-040000
2027-050000
2027-060000
2027-070000
2027-080000
2027-090000
2027-100000
2027-110000
2027-120000
2028-010000
2028-020000
2028-030000
2028-040000
2028-050000
2028-060000
2028-070000
2028-080000
2028-090000
2028-100000
2028-110000
2028-120000
2029-010000
2029-020000
2029-030000
2029-040000
2029-050000
2029-060000
2029-070000
2029-080000

Retained: 1Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Aurora · AUR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Baltimore · BAL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Fort Snelling · BLM

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Charlotte · CHL

Monthly counts

Nicholas A. Martz · NAM · Charlotte · CHL · 2026-09–2029-08 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-08 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-09071056
2026-10279174
2026-11050033
2026-12039027
2027-01046035
2027-020000
2027-030000
2027-040000
2027-050000
2027-060000
2027-070000
2027-080000
2027-090000
2027-100000
2027-110000
2027-120000
2028-010000
2028-020000
2028-030000
2028-040000
2028-050000
2028-060000
2028-070000
2028-080000
2028-090000
2028-100000
2028-110000
2028-120000
2029-010000
2029-020000
2029-030000
2029-040000
2029-050000
2029-060000
2029-070000
2029-080000

Retained: 287Excluded: 45Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Conroe · CIC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dallas · DAL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Elizabeth · ELZ

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

El Paso SPC · EPD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Harlingen · HLG

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Hyattsville · HYA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

LaSalle · JNA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Miami · KRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Oakdale · OAK

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PEP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Philadelphia · PHI

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Stewart · SDC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

San Antonio · SNA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Sterling · STE

Monthly counts

Nicholas A. Martz · NAM · Sterling · STE · 2026-09–2029-08 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-08 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-09065056
2026-100000
2026-110000
2026-120000
2027-010000
2027-020000
2027-030000
2027-040000
2027-050000
2027-060000
2027-070000
2027-080000
2027-090000
2027-100000
2027-110000
2027-120000
2028-010000
2028-020000
2028-030000
2028-040000
2028-050000
2028-060000
2028-070000
2028-080000
2028-090000
2028-100000
2028-110000
2028-120000
2029-010000
2029-020000
2029-030000
2029-040000
2029-050000
2029-060000
2029-070000
2029-080000

Retained: 65Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Annandale · WAS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

West Los Angeles Immigration Court · WLA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

This judge code has an unresolved identity or name association. Its BIA row is unavailable; this is not a zero count.

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 144 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code NAM at Charlotte in FY2021–FY2025, 4 were grants (2.78%) and 140 were denials (97.22%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 22 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

Why is FY2026 marked as a partial year?

Fiscal year 2026 runs from 2025-10-01 to 2026-09-30, and the source data end on 2026-08-31. FY2026 figures cover only part of the year, so they are not compared with complete years.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Where does this judge hear cases now?

EOIR’s official hearing directory, checked 2026-09-16, lists this name at Falls Church Immigration Adjudication Center.

Under this judge code, the 2026-08 EOIR edition records hearing dates from 2026-09 to 2029-08 at Annandale: 0 master and 1 individual proceedings.

A listing or a scheduled date does not establish a sole duty station.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

3,886Associated proceeding records
2,367Proceedings linked to asylum applications
2,070Eligible dated asylum records
1,256Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
30
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY1991
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2026 · Partial year
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 295 eligible asylum records have no completion date.
  • 312 eligible asylum records have no application result; 19 of them appear in the dated list. 293 records lack both a usable completion date and an application result. The missing-date and missing-result counts overlap.
  • 2 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

2,365 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

On the checked official listing

An official listing may include supervisory or multiple-court assignments; it does not establish a sole duty station.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Annandale

Retained: 1Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
1
Unconfirmed proportion
0.00%
Historical schedule records
269
Future schedule records
1
Other schedule types
1
Reliable asylum association
139
No identifiable asylum association
131

Aurora

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
9
Reliable asylum association
2
No identifiable asylum association
7

Baltimore

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
8
Other schedule types
4
Reliable asylum association
2
No identifiable asylum association
6

Fort Snelling

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
43
Reliable asylum association
42
No identifiable asylum association
1

Charlotte

Retained: 287Excluded: 45Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
332
Unconfirmed proportion
0.00%
Recorded handling reason
45
Historical schedule records
2,253
Future schedule records
332
Other schedule types
7
Reliable asylum association
2,213
No identifiable asylum association
372

Conroe

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
13
Other schedule types
1
Reliable asylum association
8
No identifiable asylum association
5

Dallas

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
3
Reliable asylum association
3

Elizabeth

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
296
Other schedule types
97
Reliable asylum association
100
No identifiable asylum association
196

El Paso SPC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1
No identifiable asylum association
1

Harlingen

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
45
Reliable asylum association
37
No identifiable asylum association
8

Hyattsville

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
473
Other schedule types
4
Reliable asylum association
315
No identifiable asylum association
158

LaSalle

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
20
Reliable asylum association
17
No identifiable asylum association
3

Miami · KRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
116
Reliable asylum association
49
No identifiable asylum association
67

Oakdale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
854
Other schedule types
296
Reliable asylum association
511
No identifiable asylum association
343

Los Fresnos · PEP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
103
Reliable asylum association
64
No identifiable asylum association
39

Philadelphia

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
23
Reliable asylum association
16
No identifiable asylum association
7

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
8
Reliable asylum association
6
No identifiable asylum association
2

Pearsall

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
223
Other schedule types
218
Reliable asylum association
2
No identifiable asylum association
221

Stewart

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
234
Other schedule types
182
Reliable asylum association
38
No identifiable asylum association
196

San Antonio

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
4
No identifiable asylum association
4

Sterling · STE

Retained: 65Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
65
Unconfirmed proportion
0.00%
Historical schedule records
127
Future schedule records
65
Reliable asylum association
77
No identifiable asylum association
115

Annandale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,772
Other schedule types
42
Reliable asylum association
1,233
No identifiable asylum association
539

West Los Angeles Immigration Court · WLA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
7,265
Other schedule types
8
Reliable asylum association
5,553
No identifiable asylum association
1,711
Unlinked asylum records
1
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: NAM · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY1991–FY2026 · Partial year: FY2026

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Judge Nicholas A. Martz · Charlotte Immigration Court asylum records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/nicholas-a-martz-nam Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge