AsylumCompass
Saved
English

From FY2021 to FY2025, 61 of 238 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code RLF at Dallas were grants (25.63%) and 177 were denials (74.37%). In the same years, the court recorded 19.11% and the national figure was 37.33%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Dallas · DAL

Grants 61 · Denials 177 · N 238
95% interval: 20.50%–31.53%

Records are counted at the court stored on each proceeding. The official listing names Fort Worth Immigration Adjudication Center.

Judge code RLF
25.63%N 238
Dallas
19.11%N 5,291
United States · all courts
37.33%N 367,995

Among comparable judge codes at this court

22 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2021–FY2025. Their recorded grant shares range from 2.84% to 46.75%; the median is 19.46%.
FY2026 so far
5.66%212 records through 2026-08-31 · court: 2.53%
Record coverage
20 courts with recordsFY2021–FY2026 · 36 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Hearing dates on calendar
0 master · 1,040 individualDallas · proceedings with hearing dates, 2026-09–2029-08Hearing schedule
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · official listing: Fort Worth Immigration Adjudication Center, checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Dallas

0%25%50%75%100%FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY2026100.00%75.00%36.36%22.83%5.66%30.28%27.40%26.60%10.88%2.53%46.12%47.28%43.52%23.13%
  • Judge code RLF
  • Dallas
  • United States · all courts
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Dallas · DALExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year5.66%212122003.27%–9.63%
FY202522.83%2195016917.77%–28.83%
FY202436.36%Small sample114715.17%–64.62%
FY202375.00%Small sample43130.06%–95.44%
FY2022100.00%Small sample44051.01%–100.00%
Oakdale · OAKExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year12.50%Small sample8172.24%–47.09%
FY20250.00%Small sample180180.00%–17.59%
FY202410.91%Small sample556495.10%–21.83%
FY202325.64%Small sample39102914.57%–41.08%
Aurora · AURExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year0.00%Small sample190190.00%–16.82%
FY20250.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20230.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
LaSalle · JNAExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year66.67%Small sample32120.77%–93.85%
FY20250.00%Small sample707<0.01%–35.43%
El Paso SPC · EPDExplore this court's full context
FY20250.00%Small sample4040.00%–48.99%
FY20230.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Pearsall · PSDExplore this court's full context
FY202525.00%Small sample4134.56%–69.94%
Phoenix · PHOExplore this court's full context
FY20250.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Imperial · IMPExplore this court's full context
FY20250.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Miami · KROExplore this court's full context
FY2025100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
Otero · OTOExplore this court's full context
FY20250.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Salt Lake City · SLCExplore this court's full context
FY202397.22%Small sample3635185.83%–99.51%
FY202283.33%Small sample65143.65%–96.99%
FY20210.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
Fort Snelling · BLMExplore this court's full context
FY202318.18%Small sample11295.14%–47.70%
FY20220.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Denver · DENExplore this court's full context
FY202333.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%
Los Fresnos · PISExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20220.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Conroe · CICExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Houston – S. Gessner Road · HSGExplore this court's full context
FY2023100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
New Orleans · NOLExplore this court's full context
FY202211.36%Small sample445394.95%–23.98%
FY20214.00%1004961.57%–9.84%
Harlingen · HLGExplore this court's full context
FY202250.00%Small sample63318.76%–81.24%
El Paso · ELPExplore this court's full context
FY202250.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%
Cleveland · CLEExplore this court's full context
FY20210.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationalityFY2021–FY2025 · pooledTotal (N)Court · same nationalityFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Dallas
Venezuela44.93%Small sample6928.51% · N 87027 / 631 / 33 / 3——
Mexico0.00%Small sample381.27% · N 6280 / 38————
Honduras0.00%Small sample305.55% · N 8830 / 29—0 / 1——
Nicaragua30.00%Small sample2016.67% · N 1566 / 20————
Guatemala0.00%Small sample165.58% · N 4300 / 140 / 2———
Colombia7.14%Small sample145.95% · N 1851 / 120 / 2———
El Salvador23.08%Small sample135.57% · N 9340 / 90 / 1—3 / 3—
Cuba66.67%Small sample931.58% · N 1143 / 63 / 3———
Russia60.00%Small sample579.49% · N 393 / 5————
Peru0.00%Small sample40.00% · N 430 / 4————
Nigeria100.00%Small sample366.17% · N 1333 / 3————
Panama100.00%Small sample366.67% · N 63 / 3————
Chile0.00%Small sample20.00% · N 50 / 2————
Egypt50.00%Small sample264.47% · N 761 / 2————
Eritrea100.00%Small sample274.29% · N 351 / 1——1 / 1—
Nepal0.00%Small sample235.29% · N 170 / 2————
Cameroon100.00%Small sample152.31% · N 651 / 1————
Haiti0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 70 / 1————
Iraq100.00%Small sample191.67% · N 121 / 1————
Jordan0.00%Small sample162.50% · N 80 / 1————
Pakistan0.00%Small sample129.41% · N 170 / 1————
Vietnam0.00%Small sample165.22% · N 230 / 1————
New Orleans · NOL
Honduras7.32%Small sample8215.43% · N 1,789———2 / 184 / 64
Guatemala8.33%Small sample365.93% · N 540———3 / 130 / 23
Mexico0.00%Small sample168.72% · N 195———0 / 70 / 9
El Salvador0.00%Small sample610.53% · N 152———0 / 20 / 4
India0.00%Small sample366.19% · N 139———0 / 3—
Yemen0.00%Small sample160.00% · N 5———0 / 1—
Oakdale
Colombia0.00%Small sample121.10% · N 181—0 / 80 / 4——
Ecuador0.00%Small sample101.82% · N 110—0 / 10———
Guatemala0.00%Small sample73.26% · N 920 / 10 / 50 / 1——
Uzbekistan0.00%Small sample74.48% · N 134—0 / 60 / 1——
India0.00%Small sample62.96% · N 1350 / 6————
Ethiopia20.00%Small sample513.79% · N 290 / 3—1 / 2——
Mexico20.00%Small sample51.32% · N 151—1 / 40 / 1——
Turkiye20.00%Small sample528.77% · N 2190 / 1—1 / 4——
Afghanistan25.00%Small sample434.48% · N 580 / 11 / 20 / 1——
Bolivia50.00%Small sample425.00% · N 16—0 / 22 / 2——
China0.00%Small sample44.44% · N 900 / 10 / 10 / 2——
Honduras0.00%Small sample41.63% · N 123—0 / 30 / 1——
Russia50.00%Small sample437.87% · N 367—2 / 30 / 1——
Egypt33.33%Small sample313.95% · N 430 / 10 / 11 / 1——
El Salvador0.00%Small sample35.26% · N 76—0 / 20 / 1——
Somalia0.00%Small sample318.75% · N 32——0 / 3——
Bangladesh0.00%Small sample20.00% · N 250 / 2————
Dominican Republic0.00%Small sample20.00% · N 25—0 / 10 / 1——
Georgia50.00%Small sample25.88% · N 170—1 / 2———
Mauritania50.00%Small sample211.76% · N 51——1 / 2——
Peru0.00%Small sample22.38% · N 42——0 / 2——
Venezuela100.00%Small sample222.92% · N 144—1 / 11 / 1——
Armenia100.00%Small sample116.67% · N 42——1 / 1——
Brazil0.00%Small sample18.11% · N 37——0 / 1——
Cameroon100.00%Small sample137.89% · N 95——1 / 1——
Cuba0.00%Small sample130.48% · N 105——0 / 1——
Eritrea100.00%Small sample115.91% · N 44——1 / 1——
Haiti0.00%Small sample16.90% · N 29——0 / 1——
Kenya0.00%Small sample112.50% · N 8—0 / 1———
Nepal0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 300 / 1————
Nigeria0.00%Small sample16.25% · N 16——0 / 1——
Pakistan0.00%Small sample14.55% · N 22—0 / 1———
Senegal0.00%Small sample15.77% · N 52—0 / 1———
Sudan0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 5—0 / 1———
Syria0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 9——0 / 1——
Vietnam0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 250 / 1————
Salt Lake City
Venezuela88.89%Small sample4586.02% · N 3,397——35 / 365 / 60 / 3
Fort Snelling
Honduras0.00%Small sample58.30% · N 458——0 / 40 / 1—
Mexico0.00%Small sample38.45% · N 355——0 / 3——
El Salvador0.00%Small sample211.37% · N 431——0 / 2——
Guatemala100.00%Small sample15.54% · N 650——1 / 1——
Somalia100.00%Small sample151.49% · N 202——1 / 1——
LaSalle
Iran0.00%Small sample322.41% · N 580 / 3————
China0.00%Small sample111.58% · N 1900 / 1————
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample114.71% · N 1360 / 1————
Sudan0.00%Small sample19.52% · N 210 / 1————
Turkiye0.00%Small sample117.46% · N 1260 / 1————
El Paso SPC
Afghanistan0.00%Small sample160.87% · N 230 / 1————
Cuba0.00%Small sample119.23% · N 520 / 1————
El Salvador0.00%Small sample11.59% · N 630 / 1————
Honduras0.00%Small sample13.54% · N 113——0 / 1——
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample121.05% · N 76——0 / 1——
Venezuela0.00%Small sample114.29% · N 1540 / 1————
Harlingen
Nicaragua50.00%Small sample624.18% · N 426———3 / 6—
Cleveland
Mexico0.00%Small sample35.50% · N 218————0 / 3
El Salvador0.00%Small sample29.03% · N 288————0 / 2
Pearsall
Cuba0.00%Small sample128.37% · N 1410 / 1————
Iran100.00%Small sample117.39% · N 461 / 1————
Turkiye0.00%Small sample110.00% · N 200 / 1————
Venezuela0.00%Small sample115.03% · N 1530 / 1————
Denver
Mexico0.00%Small sample214.11% · N 638——0 / 2——
El Salvador100.00%Small sample135.85% · N 371——1 / 1——
Aurora
Mexico0.00%Small sample11.73% · N 1730 / 1————
Russia0.00%Small sample158.49% · N 106——0 / 1——
El Paso
Nicaragua100.00%Small sample131.40% · N 207———1 / 1—
Venezuela0.00%Small sample136.41% · N 714———0 / 1—
Phoenix
Mexico0.00%Small sample21.63% · N 1,2860 / 2————
Los Fresnos · PIS
Guatemala0.00%Small sample13.03% · N 66———0 / 1—
Venezuela0.00%Small sample112.68% · N 71——0 / 1——
Conroe
Turkiye0.00%Small sample125.40% · N 63——0 / 1——
Houston – S. Gessner Road
Venezuela100.00%Small sample116.05% · N 648——1 / 1——
Imperial
Cuba0.00%Small sample130.00% · N 200 / 1————
Miami · KRO
Venezuela100.00%Small sample14.71% · N 851 / 1————
Otero
Colombia0.00%Small sample18.28% · N 1570 / 1————

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Dallas · DAL · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Same count scale for both hearing types. Browse horizontally to see all 36 months.

Proceedings

Master Calendar Hearings · 0 proceedings with recorded hearing dates

Individual / Merits Hearings

Months with no retained records show 0.

Monthly counts are available for all recorded courts below.

Aurora · AUR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Fort Snelling · BLM

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Boston · BOS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Conroe · CIC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Cleveland · CLE

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dallas · DAL

Monthly counts

Randall L. Fluke · RLF · Dallas · DAL · 2026-09–2029-08 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-08 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-090110087
2026-10081060
2026-11046033
2026-120105093
2027-0101200100
2027-020116085
2027-030127093
2027-040106062
2027-0501430121
2027-06086069
2027-070000
2027-080000
2027-090000
2027-100000
2027-110000
2027-120000
2028-010000
2028-020000
2028-030000
2028-040000
2028-050000
2028-060000
2028-070000
2028-080000
2028-090000
2028-100000
2028-110000
2028-120000
2029-010000
2029-020000
2029-030000
2029-040000
2029-050000
2029-060000
2029-070000
2029-080000

Retained: 1,040Excluded: 255Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Denver · DEN

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

El Paso · ELP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Elizabeth · ELZ

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

El Paso SPC · EPD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Houston – Greenspoint Park · HGP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Harlingen · HLG

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Houston - Jefferson Street Immigration Court · HOU

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Imperial · IMP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

LaSalle · JNA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Miami · KRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Laredo · LRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New Orleans · NOL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Oakdale · OAK

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Otero · OTO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PEP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Stewart · SDC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Salt Lake City · SLC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Sacramento · SMO

Monthly counts

Randall L. Fluke · RLF · Sacramento · SMO · 2026-09–2029-08 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-08 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-09022017
2026-10024014
2026-110101
2026-120000
2027-010000
2027-020000
2027-030000
2027-040000
2027-050000
2027-060000
2027-070000
2027-080000
2027-090000
2027-100000
2027-110000
2027-120000
2028-010000
2028-020000
2028-030000
2028-040000
2028-050000
2028-060000
2028-070000
2028-080000
2028-090000
2028-100000
2028-110000
2028-120000
2029-010000
2029-020000
2029-030000
2029-040000
2029-050000
2029-060000
2029-070000
2029-080000

Retained: 47Excluded: 4Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Tacoma · TAC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

This judge code has an unresolved identity or name association. Its BIA row is unavailable; this is not a zero count.

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 238 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code RLF at Dallas in FY2021–FY2025, 61 were grants (25.63%) and 177 were denials (74.37%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 20 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

Why is FY2026 marked as a partial year?

Fiscal year 2026 runs from 2025-10-01 to 2026-09-30, and the source data end on 2026-08-31. FY2026 figures cover only part of the year, so they are not compared with complete years.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Where does this judge hear cases now?

EOIR’s official hearing directory, checked 2026-09-16, lists this name at Fort Worth Immigration Adjudication Center.

Under this judge code, the 2026-08 EOIR edition records hearing dates from 2026-09 to 2029-08 at Dallas: 0 master and 1,040 individual proceedings.

A listing or a scheduled date does not establish a sole duty station.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

4,075Associated proceeding records
2,357Proceedings linked to asylum applications
1,522Eligible dated asylum records
837Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
25
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY2021
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2026 · Partial year
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 835 eligible asylum records have no completion date.
  • 929 eligible asylum records have no application result; 113 of them appear in the dated list. 816 records lack both a usable completion date and an application result. The missing-date and missing-result counts overlap.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

2,357 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

On the checked official listing

An official listing may include supervisory or multiple-court assignments; it does not establish a sole duty station.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Aurora

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
214
Other schedule types
15
Reliable asylum association
68
No identifiable asylum association
146

Fort Snelling

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
46
Reliable asylum association
42
No identifiable asylum association
4

Boston · BOS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
3
No identifiable asylum association
3

Conroe

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
921
Other schedule types
878
Reliable asylum association
23
No identifiable asylum association
898

Cleveland

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
20
Reliable asylum association
15
No identifiable asylum association
5

Dallas

Retained: 1,040Excluded: 255Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
1,295
Unconfirmed proportion
0.00%
Recorded handling reason
255
Historical schedule records
2,643
Future schedule records
1,295
Other schedule types
24
Reliable asylum association
2,987
No identifiable asylum association
951
Schedule and proceeding judge codes differ
1

Denver

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
121
Reliable asylum association
36
No identifiable asylum association
85

El Paso

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
20
Other schedule types
16
Reliable asylum association
4
No identifiable asylum association
16

Elizabeth

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
6
Reliable asylum association
2
No identifiable asylum association
4

El Paso SPC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
161
Other schedule types
78
Reliable asylum association
31
No identifiable asylum association
130

Houston – Greenspoint Park

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1
Reliable asylum association
1

Harlingen

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
6
Reliable asylum association
6

Houston - Jefferson Street Immigration Court

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
12
Reliable asylum association
6
No identifiable asylum association
6

Imperial

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
7
Reliable asylum association
6
No identifiable asylum association
1

LaSalle

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
95
Other schedule types
65
Reliable asylum association
26
No identifiable asylum association
69

Miami · KRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
5
Reliable asylum association
4
No identifiable asylum association
1

Laredo

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
20
Other schedule types
16
Reliable asylum association
4
No identifiable asylum association
16

New Orleans · NOL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,030
Other schedule types
1
Reliable asylum association
712
No identifiable asylum association
318

Oakdale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
841
Other schedule types
195
Reliable asylum association
516
No identifiable asylum association
325

Otero

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
2
Reliable asylum association
1
No identifiable asylum association
1

Los Fresnos · PEP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
6
Reliable asylum association
3
No identifiable asylum association
3

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
177
Other schedule types
78
Reliable asylum association
26
No identifiable asylum association
151

Pearsall

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
96
Other schedule types
72
Reliable asylum association
14
No identifiable asylum association
82

Stewart

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
10
Other schedule types
9
No identifiable asylum association
10

Salt Lake City

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
166
Reliable asylum association
136
No identifiable asylum association
30

Sacramento · SMO

Retained: 47Excluded: 4Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
51
Unconfirmed proportion
0.00%
Recorded handling reason
4
Future schedule records
51
Reliable asylum association
35
No identifiable asylum association
16

Tacoma

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
5
Reliable asylum association
2
No identifiable asylum association
3
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: RLF · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY2021–FY2026 · Partial year: FY2026

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Judge Randall L. Fluke · Dallas Immigration Court asylum records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/randall-l-fluke-rlf Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge