AsylumCompass
Saved
English

In FY2026, 1 of 31 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code TGC at San Antonio were grants (3.23%) and 30 were denials (96.77%). That year, the court recorded 6.80% and the national figure was 6.66%. EOIR data through 2026-09-30; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · San Antonio · SNA

Grants 1 · Denials 30 · N 31
95% interval: 0.57%–16.19%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

Judge code TGC
3.23%N 31
San Antonio
6.80%N 2,190
United States · all courts
6.66%N 158,532

Among comparable judge codes at this court

This figure has fewer than 100 grant-or-denial records, so it is not placed among comparable judge codes.

Record coverage
5 courts with recordsFY2011–FY2026 · 33 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Hearing dates on calendar
100 master · 1 individualPearsall · proceedings with hearing dates, 2026-10–2029-09Hearing schedule
Data through
2026-09-30EOIR records · official listing: San Antonio, checked 2026-10-24Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at San Antonio

0%25%50%75%100%FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY202617.18%7.55%25.00%50.00%53.33%48.28%66.67%44.44%9.46%3.23%19.24%28.95%32.74%33.92%43.75%51.95%43.12%33.84%19.00%6.80%38.08%33.32%29.99%27.95%37.09%46.08%47.18%43.30%22.99%6.66%
  • Judge code TGC
  • San Antonio
  • United States · all courts
National and judge-code figures use recorded fiscal years in this source; missing values remain unavailable.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
San Antonio · SNAExplore this court's full context
FY20263.23%Small sample311300.57%–16.19%
FY20259.46%Small sample747674.66%–18.26%
FY202444.44%Small sample94518.88%–73.33%
FY202366.67%Small sample96335.42%–87.94%
FY202248.28%Small sample29141531.39%–65.57%
FY202153.33%Small sample158730.12%–75.19%
FY202050.00%Small sample105523.66%–76.34%
FY201925.00%Small sample12398.89%–53.23%
FY20187.55%Small sample534492.97%–17.86%
FY201717.18%2273918812.83%–22.62%
FY201617.95%117219612.05%–25.89%
FY2015Not calculable000Not calculable
FY2014Not calculable000Not calculable
FY2012Not calculable000Not calculable
Pearsall · PSDExplore this court's full context
FY202614.29%Small sample213184.98%–34.64%
FY20254.76%Small sample211200.85%–22.67%
FY202437.50%Small sample83513.68%–69.43%
FY20230.00%Small sample606<0.01%–39.03%
FY202175.00%Small sample43130.06%–95.44%
FY202022.22%Small sample63144913.73%–33.91%
FY201950.00%Small sample42215.00%–85.00%
FY201848.15%Small sample27131430.74%–66.01%
FY20170.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY201618.18%Small sample11295.14%–47.70%
FY201526.09%Small sample69185117.19%–37.51%
FY201423.08%Small sample65155014.51%–34.64%
FY20132.78%Small sample361350.49%–14.17%
FY201221.43%Small sample143117.57%–47.59%
FY20117.14%Small sample141131.27%–31.47%
Laredo · LROExplore this court's full context
FY202233.33%Small sample124813.81%–60.94%
FY2021100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
FY20204.65%Small sample432411.28%–15.46%
FY201920.34%Small sample59124712.04%–32.27%
FY201822.92%Small sample48113713.31%–36.54%
Conroe · CICExplore this court's full context
FY2022100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
Oakdale · OAKExplore this court's full context
FY20190.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-09-30 · eoir-2026-09-case-v1 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups show FY2026 first and retain historical counts. These are proceeding records, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2026 and historical fiscal years
Recorded nationalityRecorded grant share · FY2026Total (N)Court · same nationalityFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
San Antonio
Venezuela0.00%Small sample117.82% · N 4990 / 115 / 174 / 41 / 12 / 30 / 0
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample43.91% · N 1280 / 40 / 7—1 / 14 / 60 / 1
Honduras0.00%Small sample34.21% · N 3800 / 30 / 80 / 2—0 / 10 / 1
Colombia33.33%Small sample33.23% · N 1861 / 31 / 4——0 / 1—
Cuba0.00%Small sample25.20% · N 1730 / 20 / 70 / 01 / 13 / 73 / 6
Mexico0.00%Small sample20.32% · N 3090 / 20 / 60 / 00 / 0—0 / 0
India0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 150 / 10 / 3——0 / 00 / 0
Ecuador0.00%Small sample13.45% · N 290 / 10 / 0——0 / 10 / 0
Iran0.00%Small sample125.00% · N 40 / 10 / 1————
Peru0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 410 / 10 / 10 / 0——0 / 0
Brazil0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 100 / 10 / 0————
Somalia0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 20 / 1—————
El SalvadorNot calculable04.26% · N 470 / 00 / 2—1 / 30 / 22 / 4
GuatemalaNot calculable00.00% · N 1050 / 01 / 60 / 0—1 / 10 / 0
NepalNot calculable015.28% · N 720 / 00 / 50 / 00 / 01 / 1—
CongoNot calculable00.00% · N 20 / 00 / 2————
EgyptNot calculable00.00% · N 30 / 00 / 2————
AfghanistanNot calculable066.67% · N 90 / 00 / 1————
Democratic Republic Of CongoNot calculable033.33% · N 30 / 0———0 / 1—
GhanaNot calculable00.00% · N 10 / 00 / 0——1 / 1—
JordanNot calculable033.33% · N 30 / 00 / 1————
TurkiyeNot calculable057.14% · N 70 / 00 / 0——0 / 1—
AngolaNot calculable033.33% · N 30 / 00 / 0——0 / 0—
BoliviaNot calculable0Not calculable · N 00 / 00 / 0————
Burkina FasoNot calculable0Not calculable · N 00 / 0—————
ChinaNot calculable00.00% · N 40 / 0———0 / 0—
Dominican RepublicNot calculable00.00% · N 10 / 00 / 0——0 / 0—
EthiopiaNot calculable00.00% · N 10 / 00 / 0————
JamaicaNot calculable00.00% · N 30 / 0—————
Kirghizia (Kyrgyzstan)Not calculable00.00% · N 10 / 0—————
MaliNot calculable0Not calculable · N 00 / 00 / 0————
MauritaniaNot calculable050.00% · N 40 / 00 / 0——0 / 0—
PakistanNot calculable00.00% · N 10 / 00 / 0———0 / 0
PanamaNot calculable00.00% · N 30 / 00 / 0————
RwandaNot calculable00.00% · N 10 / 00 / 0————
SenegalNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 3—0 / 0—1 / 11 / 1—
CameroonNo stored cell for this period—42.86% · N 14—0 / 00 / 10 / 00 / 01 / 1
EritreaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2——0 / 1——2 / 2
GambiaNo stored cell for this period——————0 / 1—
GuineaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1—0 / 0——1 / 1—
RussiaNo stored cell for this period—93.10% · N 29—0 / 00 / 1———
Sri LankaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0———1 / 1——
TogoNo stored cell for this period———0 / 0—0 / 1——
VietnamNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1—0 / 1————
ArmeniaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—0 / 0————
AzerbaijanNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—0 / 0————
BangladeshNo stored cell for this period—20.00% · N 5—0 / 0——0 / 0—
BelizeNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—0 / 0————
ChadNo stored cell for this period———0 / 0————
GeorgiaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—————0 / 0
HaitiNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 3—0 / 0——0 / 00 / 0
IndonesiaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 3—0 / 0————
KazakhstanNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—0 / 0————
MoroccoNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—0 / 0————
Nationality not recordedNo stored cell for this period———————0 / 0
NigeriaNo stored cell for this period—26.67% · N 15—0 / 0————
Sierra LeoneNo stored cell for this period————0 / 0———
Tajikistan (Tadzhik)No stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1————0 / 0—
UzbekistanNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0————0 / 0—
Pearsall
Honduras0.00%Small sample50.58% · N 1730 / 50 / 30 / 4———
Cuba0.00%Small sample45.98% · N 1170 / 40 / 5—0 / 2——
Mexico0.00%Small sample20.55% · N 1830 / 20 / 3————
Venezuela0.00%Small sample14.71% · N 1700 / 11 / 31 / 10 / 1——
Colombia0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 390 / 10 / 3—0 / 1——
China100.00%Small sample120.83% · N 241 / 10 / 02 / 3———
Guatemala0.00%Small sample11.35% · N 740 / 10 / 1————
Afghanistan100.00%Small sample147.83% · N 231 / 1—————
El Salvador0.00%Small sample12.04% · N 490 / 1—————
Guyana0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 10 / 1—————
Haiti0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 130 / 1—————
India0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 180 / 10 / 0————
Rwanda100.00%Small sample150.00% · N 21 / 1—————
EcuadorNot calculable00.00% · N 250 / 00 / 1—0 / 1——
CameroonNot calculable025.00% · N 200 / 0————1 / 1
GeorgiaNot calculable00.00% · N 20 / 0—————
NicaraguaNot calculable02.27% · N 440 / 00 / 0————
TurkiyeNot calculable025.00% · N 80 / 0—————
AngolaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2—0 / 1————
Dominican RepublicNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 9———0 / 1——
JamaicaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 3—0 / 1————
BrazilNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 3—0 / 0————
EritreaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1—————0 / 1
KazakhstanNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—0 / 0————
Sri LankaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1—————2 / 2
Conroe
NicaraguaNo stored cell for this period—5.26% · N 38————1 / 1—
Dallas
HondurasNo stored cell for this period—0.20% · N 1,002—0 / 0————
El Paso
Hyattsville
VenezuelaNo stored cell for this period—8.45% · N 521—0 / 0————
Laredo
GuineaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1————2 / 2—
SenegalNo stored cell for this period——————1 / 2—
ColombiaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 5————0 / 1—
Dominican RepublicNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0————0 / 1—
GuatemalaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 31————0 / 1—
HondurasNo stored cell for this period—1.67% · N 60————0 / 1—
IranNo stored cell for this period—30.00% · N 10————1 / 1—
NicaraguaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 15————0 / 1—
Sierra LeoneNo stored cell for this period——————0 / 1—
VenezuelaNo stored cell for this period—3.28% · N 61————0 / 1—
EritreaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2—————1 / 1
Miami · MIA
VenezuelaNo stored cell for this period—6.16% · N 438—0 / 0————
New Orleans · NOL
HondurasNo stored cell for this period—1.23% · N 813—0 / 0————
Oakdale

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no stored cell. A zero denominator cannot give a share.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-09-case-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Pearsall · PSD · All proceedings · 2026-10–2029-09

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-10–2029-09 (36 months)

Same count scale for both hearing types. Browse horizontally to see all 36 months.

Proceedings

Master Calendar Hearings

Individual / Merits Hearings

Months with no retained records show 0.

Monthly counts are available for all recorded courts below.

Conroe · CIC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

El Paso · ELP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Houston – Greenspoint Park · HGP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Harlingen · HLG

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

LaSalle · JNA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Laredo · LRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Oakdale · OAK

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Monthly counts

Thomas G. Crossan Jr. · TGC · Pearsall · PSD · 2026-10–2029-09 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-09 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-10100170
2026-110000
2026-120000
2027-010000
2027-020000
2027-030000
2027-040000
2027-050000
2027-060000
2027-070000
2027-080000
2027-090000
2027-100000
2027-110000
2027-120000
2028-010000
2028-020000
2028-030000
2028-040000
2028-050000
2028-060000
2028-070000
2028-080000
2028-090000
2028-100000
2028-110000
2028-120000
2029-010000
2029-020000
2029-030000
2029-040000
2029-050000
2029-060000
2029-070000
2029-080000
2029-090000

Retained: 101Excluded: 1Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

San Antonio · SNA

Monthly counts

Thomas G. Crossan Jr. · TGC · San Antonio · SNA · 2026-10–2029-09 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-09 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-101000
2026-110000
2026-120000
2027-01730320
2027-02167178015
2027-03260279821
2027-04215228216
2027-05157258116
2027-06135356023
2027-0732201311
2027-08121204911
2027-09127144710
2027-10782261
2027-1140142514
2027-1295165416
2028-0151142714
2028-02590280
2028-03307167
2028-04528336
2028-0552142614
2028-0629221520
2028-070000
2028-0870204314
2028-0949080
2028-100000
2028-110000
2028-120000
2029-010000
2029-020000
2029-030000
2029-040000
2029-050000
2029-060000
2029-070000
2029-080000
2029-090000

Retained: 2,190Excluded: 2,620Unable to confirm: 26Source files and checks

Annandale · WAS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-09-30 · eoir-2026-09-case-v1 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code · FY2026

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-09 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Decision FY2026 · respondent-filed appeals (A)

Denominator: respondent-filed BIA IJ Case Appeal events with an exact proceeding link and stored judge code, with a recorded disposition during the displayed period.

Respondent-filed recorded BIA appeal events · FY2026
Appeal events (denominator)DIS · recorded dismissal/affirmanceREM · remand as recordedSUS · appeal sustained as recordedOther · mixed recorded dispositions
1431010

Small sample: N is below 100. Counts remain visible; a few events can change the pattern substantially.

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 31 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code TGC at San Antonio in FY2026, 1 were grants (3.23%) and 30 were denials (96.77%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 5 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Where does this judge hear cases now?

EOIR’s official hearing directory, checked 2026-10-24, lists this name at San Antonio.

Under this judge code, the 2026-09 EOIR edition records hearing dates from 2026-10 to 2029-09 at Pearsall: 100 master and 1 individual proceedings.

A listing or a scheduled date does not establish a sole duty station.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-09-case-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

28,240Associated proceeding records
4,204Proceedings linked to asylum applications
3,103Eligible dated asylum records
1,117Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
10
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY2011
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2026
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 1,087 eligible asylum records have no completion date.
  • 1,575 eligible asylum records have no application result; 491 of them appear in the dated list. 1,084 records lack both a usable completion date and an application result. The missing-date and missing-result counts overlap.
  • 14 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-09-30. FY2026 spans its complete fiscal-year calendar; reporting may be incomplete and later revised. Earlier stored dates do not prove service dates or decision authorship.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

4,190 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

On the checked official listing

An official listing may include supervisory or multiple-court assignments; it does not establish a sole duty station.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-09 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-09-30. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-09-30

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Conroe

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
51
Other schedule types
51
No identifiable asylum association
51

El Paso

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
273
Other schedule types
75
Reliable asylum association
47
No identifiable asylum association
226

Houston – Greenspoint Park

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
17
Other schedule types
17
No identifiable asylum association
17

Harlingen

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
14
Other schedule types
10
Reliable asylum association
1
No identifiable asylum association
13

LaSalle

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
8
Other schedule types
8
No identifiable asylum association
8

Laredo

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
7,280
Other schedule types
2,372
Reliable asylum association
2,035
No identifiable asylum association
5,244
Unlinked asylum records
1

Oakdale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
323
Other schedule types
84
Reliable asylum association
187
No identifiable asylum association
136

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
58
Other schedule types
58
No identifiable asylum association
58

Pearsall

Retained: 101Excluded: 1Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
102
Unconfirmed proportion
0.00%
Recorded handling reason
1
Historical schedule records
49,525
Future schedule records
102
Other schedule types
13,691
Reliable asylum association
9,141
No identifiable asylum association
40,482
Unlinked asylum records
4

San Antonio

Retained: 2,190Excluded: 2,620Unable to confirm: 26

Raw Master and Individual records
4,836
Unconfirmed proportion
0.54%
Recorded handling reason
2,620
Multiple future records without a handling reason
26
Historical schedule records
25,050
Future schedule records
4,842
Other schedule types
69
Reliable asylum association
12,561
No identifiable asylum association
17,331
Schedule and proceeding judge codes differ
1

Annandale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1
No identifiable asylum association
1
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These counts describe the selected disposition period. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 31,264 · Linked to a stored judge code: 31,252.

Respondent-filed source events: 29,285 · Linked to a stored judge code: 29,275 · Published respondent-filed events: 29,088 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 187.

Judge code: TGC · Stored source field: saved IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: disposition_fy · Historical period: 2025-10-01–2026-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-09-30.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY2011–FY2026

Source edition2026-09

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Fiscal years offered on web pagesFY2021–FY2026

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Judge Thomas G. Crossan Jr. · San Antonio Immigration Court asylum records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/thomas-g-crossan-jr-tgc Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge