AsylumCompass
Saved
English

This historical identity has not been confirmed. Records cannot be attributed to this person.

From FY2021 to FY2025, 72 of 154 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code VPG at Dallas were grants (46.75%) and 82 were denials (53.25%). In the same years, the court recorded 19.11% and the national figure was 37.33%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Dallas · DAL

Grants 72 · Denials 82 · N 154
95% interval: 39.05%–54.62%

Judge code VPG
46.75%N 154
Dallas
19.11%N 5,291
United States · all courts
37.33%N 367,995

Among comparable judge codes at this court

22 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2021–FY2025. Their recorded grant shares range from 2.84% to 46.75%; the median is 19.46%.
Record coverage
15 courts with recordsFY1997–FY2024 · 41 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · not on the official listing checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Dallas

0%25%50%75%100%FY2015FY2016FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY202420.18%31.18%44.12%31.58%54.10%70.37%28.57%9.12%12.85%15.18%17.55%18.95%13.32%32.03%30.28%27.40%26.60%37.13%46.12%47.28%43.52%
  • Judge code VPG
  • Dallas
  • United States · all courts
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Dallas · DALExplore this court's full context
FY202428.57%Small sample2882015.25%–47.06%
FY202370.37%Small sample2719851.52%–84.15%
FY202254.10%Small sample61332841.72%–65.99%
FY202131.58%Small sample38122619.08%–47.46%
FY202044.12%Small sample34151928.88%–60.55%
FY201931.18%Small sample93296422.67%–41.19%
FY201820.18%109228713.72%–28.67%
FY19970.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
El Paso SPC · EPDExplore this court's full context
FY20247.14%Small sample282261.98%–22.65%
FY202317.50%Small sample407338.75%–31.95%
FY202240.00%Small sample52311.76%–76.93%
Conroe · CICExplore this court's full context
FY202433.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%
FY20220.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY2021100.00%Small sample99070.09%–100.00%
FY202050.00%Small sample54272737.11%–62.89%
San Antonio · SNAExplore this court's full context
FY20240.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Los Fresnos · PISExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY202233.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%
FY20190.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Aurora · AURExplore this court's full context
FY20220.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY201955.56%Small sample95426.67%–81.12%
FY20180.00%Small sample707<0.01%–35.43%
Atlanta – Ted Turner Drive · ATDExplore this court's full context
FY2021100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
New York - Federal Plaza · NYCExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample130130.00%–22.81%
New York - Broadway · NYBExplore this court's full context
FY2020100.00%Small sample22034.24%–100.00%
Las Vegas · LVGExplore this court's full context
FY20190.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Chicago · CHIExplore this court's full context
FY201840.00%Small sample52311.76%–76.93%
FY201753.13%Small sample64343041.07%–64.82%
FY201632.56%Small sample43142920.49%–47.48%
FY201562.22%Small sample45281747.63%–74.89%
FY201458.97%Small sample39231643.42%–72.92%
FY201354.76%Small sample42231939.95%–68.78%
FY201264.29%Small sample70452552.59%–74.50%
FY201148.84%Small sample86424438.55%–59.22%
FY20090.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20070.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20060.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Otay Mesa · OTMExplore this court's full context
FY201833.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%
Omaha · OMAExplore this court's full context
FY201727.78%Small sample1851312.50%–50.87%
Elizabeth · ELZExplore this court's full context
FY2017100.00%Small sample22034.24%–100.00%
Fort Snelling · BLMExplore this court's full context
FY20170.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationalityFY2021–FY2025 · pooledTotal (N)Court · same nationalityFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Dallas
El Salvador23.91%Small sample465.57% · N 934—0 / 64 / 63 / 114 / 23
Honduras33.33%Small sample185.55% · N 883—0 / 2—1 / 95 / 7
Mexico13.33%Small sample151.27% · N 628—0 / 30 / 12 / 70 / 4
Egypt92.31%Small sample1364.47% · N 76—1 / 1—11 / 12—
Guatemala46.15%Small sample135.58% · N 430——5 / 80 / 31 / 2
Venezuela75.00%Small sample828.51% · N 870—1 / 32 / 23 / 3—
Nigeria100.00%Small sample566.17% · N 133———5 / 5—
Ecuador0.00%Small sample33.33% · N 30—0 / 3———
India0.00%Small sample320.45% · N 44———0 / 3—
Russia100.00%Small sample379.49% · N 39—3 / 3———
Cameroon100.00%Small sample252.31% · N 65—1 / 1—1 / 1—
China50.00%Small sample251.22% · N 41—0 / 1——1 / 1
Colombia0.00%Small sample25.95% · N 185—0 / 10 / 1——
Ethiopia50.00%Small sample275.00% · N 16—0 / 11 / 1——
Nicaragua100.00%Small sample216.67% · N 156———1 / 11 / 1
Turkiye100.00%Small sample277.78% · N 81——2 / 2——
Afghanistan0.00%Small sample177.42% · N 62——0 / 1——
Albania100.00%Small sample160.00% · N 5—1 / 1———
Cuba100.00%Small sample131.58% · N 114———1 / 1—
Eritrea100.00%Small sample174.29% · N 35——1 / 1——
Guinea100.00%Small sample166.67% · N 3———1 / 1—
Iran100.00%Small sample169.23% · N 13——1 / 1——
Iraq100.00%Small sample191.67% · N 12———1 / 1—
Ivory Coast (Cote D'Ivoire)100.00%Small sample150.00% · N 2——1 / 1——
Kirghizia (Kyrgyzstan)0.00%Small sample185.71% · N 7—0 / 1———
Mauritania100.00%Small sample133.33% · N 3——1 / 1——
Nepal100.00%Small sample135.29% · N 17——1 / 1——
Pakistan100.00%Small sample129.41% · N 17———1 / 1—
Stateless - Alien Unable To Name A Country100.00%Small sample150.00% · N 14———1 / 1—
Ukraine100.00%Small sample188.89% · N 9———1 / 1—
Zimbabwe100.00%Small sample142.86% · N 21—1 / 1———
El Paso SPC
Colombia15.38%Small sample137.87% · N 89—0 / 42 / 9——
Mexico0.00%Small sample130.63% · N 158—0 / 90 / 30 / 1—
Honduras18.18%Small sample113.54% · N 113—0 / 22 / 80 / 1—
Venezuela0.00%Small sample714.29% · N 154—0 / 30 / 4——
Guatemala20.00%Small sample510.39% · N 77—0 / 11 / 4——
Ecuador0.00%Small sample32.50% · N 40——0 / 3——
Nicaragua66.67%Small sample321.05% · N 76——0 / 12 / 2—
Dominican Republic0.00%Small sample27.69% · N 13——0 / 10 / 1—
El Salvador0.00%Small sample21.59% · N 63—0 / 10 / 1——
Iran0.00%Small sample244.83% · N 29—0 / 10 / 1——
Mauritania0.00%Small sample214.29% · N 21—0 / 10 / 1——
Senegal0.00%Small sample212.50% · N 8—0 / 2———
Bahamas0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1——0 / 1——
Belize0.00%Small sample133.33% · N 3—0 / 1———
Burma (Myanmar)0.00%Small sample133.33% · N 3—0 / 1———
China100.00%Small sample126.32% · N 19—1 / 1———
Nigeria100.00%Small sample111.11% · N 9—1 / 1———
Panama0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 9——0 / 1——
Syria100.00%Small sample123.08% · N 13——1 / 1——
Turkiye100.00%Small sample133.33% · N 24——1 / 1——
Conroe
Cuba100.00%Small sample724.60% · N 126————7 / 7
Colombia0.00%Small sample11.68% · N 179—0 / 1———
El Salvador0.00%Small sample10.51% · N 195———0 / 1—
Georgia100.00%Small sample126.09% · N 23————1 / 1
Jamaica100.00%Small sample125.00% · N 4—1 / 1———
Venezuela100.00%Small sample18.43% · N 261————1 / 1
Yemen0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 2—0 / 1———
Los Fresnos · PIS
Honduras50.00%Small sample22.76% · N 181———1 / 2—
Mexico0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 211———0 / 1—
Venezuela0.00%Small sample112.68% · N 71——0 / 1——
Aurora
El Salvador0.00%Small sample14.35% · N 46———0 / 1—
Mexico0.00%Small sample11.73% · N 173———0 / 1—
Atlanta – Ted Turner Drive
Syria100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 2————1 / 1
San Antonio
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample130.20% · N 457—0 / 1———

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Dallas · DAL · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

All Master and Individual schedule records in this view were excluded by the counting rules. See the coverage details.

Monthly counts are available for all recorded courts below.

Aurora · AUR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Baltimore · BAL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Fort Snelling · BLM

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Chicago · CHI

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Conroe · CIC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dallas · DAL

Monthly counts

Virginia Perez-Guzman · VPG · Dallas · DAL · 2026-09–2029-08 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-08 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-090000
2026-100000
2026-110000
2026-120000
2027-010000
2027-020000
2027-030000
2027-040000
2027-050000
2027-060000
2027-070000
2027-080000
2027-090000
2027-100000
2027-110000
2027-120000
2028-010000
2028-020000
2028-030000
2028-040000
2028-050000
2028-060000
2028-070000
2028-080000
2028-090000
2028-100000
2028-110000
2028-120000
2029-010000
2029-020000
2029-030000
2029-040000
2029-050000
2029-060000
2029-070000
2029-080000

Retained: 0Excluded: 5,063Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Elizabeth · ELZ

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

El Paso SPC · EPD

Future schedule records exist outside the displayed months.

Retained: 0Excluded: 1Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Las Vegas · LVG

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New York - Broadway · NYB

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New York - Federal Plaza · NYC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Omaha · OMA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Otay Mesa · OTM

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

Denominator: respondent-filed BIA IJ Case Appeal events with an exact proceeding link and stored judge code, with a recorded disposition during the displayed period.

Respondent-filed recorded BIA appeal events during FY2021–FY2025
Appeal events (denominator)DIS · recorded dismissal/affirmanceREM · remand as recordedSUS · appeal sustained as recordedOther · mixed recorded dispositions
865710019

Small sample: N is below 100. Counts remain visible; a few events can change the pattern substantially.

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 154 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code VPG at Dallas in FY2021–FY2025, 72 were grants (46.75%) and 82 were denials (53.25%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 15 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

18,495Associated proceeding records
3,065Proceedings linked to asylum applications
3,060Eligible dated asylum records
995Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
22
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY1997
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2025
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 163 eligible asylum records have no application result; 163 of them appear in the dated list.
  • 5 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

3,060 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

Not on the checked official listing

The checked listing does not establish why this name is absent or where this person works now.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Aurora

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
369
Other schedule types
186
Reliable asylum association
74
No identifiable asylum association
295

Baltimore

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
2
No identifiable asylum association
2

Fort Snelling

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
6
Reliable asylum association
2
No identifiable asylum association
4

Chicago

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
32,795
Other schedule types
1,954
Reliable asylum association
8,410
No identifiable asylum association
24,385

Conroe

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,850
Other schedule types
437
Reliable asylum association
1,135
No identifiable asylum association
715

Dallas

Retained: 0Excluded: 5,063Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
5,063
Unconfirmed proportion
0.00%
Recorded handling reason
5,063
Historical schedule records
31,255
Future schedule records
5,069
Other schedule types
489
Reliable asylum association
13,799
No identifiable asylum association
22,524
Unlinked asylum records
1

Elizabeth

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
119
Other schedule types
37
Reliable asylum association
39
No identifiable asylum association
80

El Paso SPC

Retained: 0Excluded: 1Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
1
Unconfirmed proportion
0.00%
Recorded handling reason
1
Historical schedule records
1,969
Future schedule records
1
Other schedule types
439
Reliable asylum association
625
No identifiable asylum association
1,345

Las Vegas

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
119
Other schedule types
11
Reliable asylum association
32
No identifiable asylum association
87

New York - Broadway

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
399
Reliable asylum association
225
No identifiable asylum association
174

New York - Federal Plaza

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
235
Reliable asylum association
25
No identifiable asylum association
210

Omaha

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
58
Reliable asylum association
45
No identifiable asylum association
13

Otay Mesa

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
215
Other schedule types
154
Reliable asylum association
32
No identifiable asylum association
183

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,098
Other schedule types
408
Reliable asylum association
78
No identifiable asylum association
1,020
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: VPG · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY1997–FY2025

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Virginia Perez-Guzman: historical immigration judge code records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/virginia-perez-guzman-vpg Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge