AsylumCompass
Saved
English

This historical identity has not been confirmed. Records cannot be attributed to this person.

In FY1994, 0 of 8 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code WFN at El Paso SPC were grants (0.00%) and 8 were denials (100.00%). That year, the court recorded 0.00%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · El Paso SPC · EPD

Grants 0 · Denials 8 · N 8
95% interval: 0.00%–32.44%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

Judge code WFN
0.00%N 8
El Paso SPC
0.00%N 35
United States · all courts
No national figure is published for this period

Among comparable judge codes at this court

This figure has fewer than 100 grant-or-denial records, so it is not placed among comparable judge codes.

Record coverage
15 courts with recordsFY1981–FY1994 · 40 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · not on the official listing checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at El Paso SPC

0%10%20%30%40%50%FY1990FY1991FY1992FY1993FY19945.00%7.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.77%5.56%2.78%4.76%0.00%
  • Judge code WFN
  • El Paso SPC
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
El Paso SPC · EPDExplore this court's full context
FY19940.00%Small sample8080.00%–32.44%
FY19930.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
FY19920.00%Small sample110110.00%–25.88%
FY19917.14%Small sample141131.27%–31.47%
FY19905.00%Small sample201190.89%–23.61%
El Paso · ELPExplore this court's full context
FY19940.00%Small sample8080.00%–32.44%
FY19930.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY199212.50%Small sample8172.24%–47.09%
FY19910.00%Small sample4040.00%–48.99%
FY199016.67%Small sample6153.01%–56.35%
FY19870.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Las Vegas · LVGExplore this court's full context
FY19940.00%Small sample707<0.01%–35.43%
FY19930.00%Small sample170170.00%–18.43%
FY198533.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%
Elizabeth · ELZExplore this court's full context
FY19930.00%Small sample707<0.01%–35.43%
Miami · KROExplore this court's full context
FY19930.00%Small sample4040.00%–48.99%
Sacramento · SMOExplore this court's full context
FY19930.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Miami · MIAExplore this court's full context
FY19910.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
FY19900.00%Small sample707<0.01%–35.43%
Phoenix · PHOExplore this court's full context
FY19910.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19860.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY19850.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19840.00%Small sample606<0.01%–39.03%
Seattle · SEAExplore this court's full context
FY199015.38%Small sample132114.33%–42.23%
FY19895.77%Small sample523491.98%–15.64%
FY198810.42%Small sample485434.53%–22.17%
FY19873.95%Small sample763731.35%–10.97%
FY19867.27%Small sample554512.86%–17.26%
FY19850.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19840.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY198133.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%
Boston · BOSExplore this court's full context
FY19900.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Denver · DENExplore this court's full context
FY19890.00%Small sample100100.00%–27.75%
Aurora · AURExplore this court's full context
FY19890.00%Small sample4040.00%–48.99%
FY19880.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Portland · POOExplore this court's full context
FY198850.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%
FY198713.64%Small sample223194.75%–33.33%
FY19860.00%Small sample12012<0.01%–24.25%
Florence · FLOExplore this court's full context
FY19850.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
Tucson · TUCExplore this court's full context
FY1984100.00%Small sample44051.01%–100.00%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Baltimore · BAL · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Aurora · AUR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Baltimore · BAL

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Boston · BOS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Buffalo · BUF

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Chicago · CHI

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Denver · DEN

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

El Paso · ELP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Elizabeth · ELZ

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

El Paso SPC · EPD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Florence · FLO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Harlingen · HLG

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Miami · KRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Las Vegas · LVG

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Miami · MIA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New York - Varick · NYD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Oakdale · OAK

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Phoenix · PHO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Portland · POO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Seattle · SEA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Sacramento · SMO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Tucson · TUC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Napanoch · ULS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

No qualifying respondent-filed BIA appeal events are recorded for this judge code in the displayed population and period. This does not establish no service or no decisions.

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 8 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code WFN at El Paso SPC in FY1994, 0 were grants (0.00%) and 8 were denials (100.00%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 15 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

14,656Associated proceeding records
672Proceedings linked to asylum applications
672Eligible dated asylum records
458Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
17
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY1981
Latest recorded completion FY
FY1994
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 6 eligible asylum records have no application result; 6 of them appear in the dated list.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

672 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

Not on the checked official listing

The checked listing does not establish why this name is absent or where this person works now.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Aurora

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,255
Other schedule types
1,255
Reliable asylum association
68
No identifiable asylum association
1,187

Baltimore

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
45
Other schedule types
43
No identifiable asylum association
45

Boston · BOS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
28
Other schedule types
28
Reliable asylum association
6
No identifiable asylum association
22

Buffalo

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
3
Other schedule types
3
No identifiable asylum association
3

Chicago

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
105
Other schedule types
104
No identifiable asylum association
105

Denver

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
152
Other schedule types
151
Reliable asylum association
23
No identifiable asylum association
129

El Paso

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
6,805
Other schedule types
6,720
Reliable asylum association
200
No identifiable asylum association
6,605

Elizabeth

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
33
Other schedule types
33
Reliable asylum association
28
No identifiable asylum association
5

El Paso SPC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
7,457
Other schedule types
7,449
Reliable asylum association
394
No identifiable asylum association
7,063

Florence

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
57
Other schedule types
57
Reliable asylum association
19
No identifiable asylum association
38

Harlingen

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
45
Other schedule types
45
Reliable asylum association
10
No identifiable asylum association
35

Miami · KRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
39
Other schedule types
39
Reliable asylum association
34
No identifiable asylum association
5

Las Vegas

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
691
Other schedule types
687
Reliable asylum association
135
No identifiable asylum association
556

Miami · MIA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
172
Other schedule types
172
Reliable asylum association
80
No identifiable asylum association
92

New York - Varick

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
27
Other schedule types
27
No identifiable asylum association
27

Oakdale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1
Other schedule types
1
No identifiable asylum association
1

Phoenix

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
294
Other schedule types
290
Reliable asylum association
36
No identifiable asylum association
258

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
390
Other schedule types
385
Reliable asylum association
51
No identifiable asylum association
339

Portland

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
656
Other schedule types
651
Reliable asylum association
129
No identifiable asylum association
527

Seattle

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
5,099
Other schedule types
5,052
Reliable asylum association
871
No identifiable asylum association
4,228

Sacramento · SMO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
42
Other schedule types
42
Reliable asylum association
4
No identifiable asylum association
38

Tucson

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
41
Other schedule types
41
Reliable asylum association
10
No identifiable asylum association
31

Napanoch · ULS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
22
Other schedule types
22
No identifiable asylum association
22
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: WFN · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY1981–FY1994

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “William F., JR. Nail: historical immigration judge code records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/william-f-jr-nail-wfn Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge