AsylumCompass
Saved
English

From FY2021 to FY2025, 81 of 297 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code XDD at Dallas were grants (27.27%) and 216 were denials (72.73%). In the same years, the court recorded 19.11% and the national figure was 37.33%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Dallas · DAL

Grants 81 · Denials 216 · N 297
95% interval: 22.52%–32.60%

Judge code XDD
27.27%N 297
Dallas
19.11%N 5,291
United States · all courts
37.33%N 367,995

Among comparable judge codes at this court

22 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2021–FY2025. Their recorded grant shares range from 2.84% to 46.75%; the median is 19.46%.
FY2026 so far
1.22%327 records through 2026-08-31 · court: 2.53%
Record coverage
8 courts with recordsFY2005–FY2026 · 31 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Hearing dates on calendar
9,045 master · 2,456 individualDallas · proceedings with hearing dates, 2026-09–2029-08Hearing schedule
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · official listing: Dallas, checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Dallas

0%25%50%75%100%FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY202666.67%20.45%10.20%14.29%80.00%37.68%44.44%29.73%11.76%1.22%15.18%17.55%18.95%13.32%32.03%30.28%27.40%26.60%10.88%2.53%37.13%46.12%47.28%43.52%23.13%
  • Judge code XDD
  • Dallas
  • United States · all courts
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Dallas · DALExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year1.22%32743230.48%–3.10%
FY202511.76%136161207.37%–18.26%
FY202429.73%Small sample37112617.49%–45.78%
FY202344.44%Small sample45202530.94%–58.82%
FY202237.68%Small sample69264327.18%–49.48%
FY202180.00%Small sample108249.02%–94.33%
FY202014.29%Small sample355306.26%–29.38%
FY201910.20%Small sample495444.44%–21.76%
FY201820.45%Small sample4493511.15%–34.50%
FY201766.67%Small sample39261350.98%–79.37%
FY20167.89%Small sample383352.72%–20.80%
FY20050.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Los Fresnos · PISExplore this court's full context
FY20240.00%Small sample130130.00%–22.81%
FY20234.17%Small sample241230.74%–20.24%
FY20220.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
FY2021100.00%Small sample22034.24%–100.00%
FY202033.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%
FY20170.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Conroe · CICExplore this court's full context
FY20240.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20230.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20220.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY202050.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%
San Antonio · SNAExplore this court's full context
FY20240.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
El Paso SPC · EPDExplore this court's full context
FY202315.38%Small sample132114.33%–42.23%
FY20220.00%Small sample4040.00%–48.99%
FY202120.00%Small sample5143.62%–62.45%
FY202015.38%Small sample132114.33%–42.23%
El Paso · ELPExplore this court's full context
FY20220.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Aurora · AURExplore this court's full context
FY20210.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY201612.50%Small sample8172.24%–47.09%
Elizabeth · ELZExplore this court's full context
FY201758.33%Small sample127531.95%–80.67%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationalityFY2021–FY2025 · pooledTotal (N)Court · same nationalityFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Dallas
Venezuela29.51%Small sample6128.51% · N 8703 / 354 / 118 / 92 / 51 / 1
El Salvador8.51%Small sample475.57% · N 9340 / 190 / 33 / 51 / 20—
Honduras2.44%Small sample415.55% · N 8830 / 130 / 100 / 71 / 11—
Mexico0.00%Small sample301.27% · N 6280 / 230 / 1—0 / 50 / 1
Guatemala0.00%Small sample225.58% · N 4300 / 13—0 / 80 / 1—
Nigeria76.92%Small sample1366.17% · N 1335 / 8—4 / 41 / 1—
Egypt90.91%Small sample1164.47% · N 760 / 13 / 3—7 / 7—
Colombia0.00%Small sample105.95% · N 1850 / 80 / 2———
Romania0.00%Small sample95.00% · N 40——0 / 50 / 4—
Turkiye62.50%Small sample877.78% · N 810 / 20 / 1—3 / 32 / 2
Afghanistan80.00%Small sample577.42% · N 621 / 21 / 11 / 11 / 1—
Cuba40.00%Small sample531.58% · N 1140 / 2———2 / 3
Jordan100.00%Small sample462.50% · N 8———4 / 4—
Sudan100.00%Small sample360.00% · N 5————3 / 3
Vietnam100.00%Small sample365.22% · N 233 / 3————
Angola50.00%Small sample218.18% · N 110 / 1——1 / 1—
Cameroon100.00%Small sample252.31% · N 65—1 / 11 / 1——
Congo100.00%Small sample241.67% · N 12———2 / 2—
Ethiopia100.00%Small sample275.00% · N 161 / 11 / 1———
Nepal50.00%Small sample235.29% · N 17——1 / 2——
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample216.67% · N 1560 / 2————
Ukraine100.00%Small sample288.89% · N 9——2 / 2——
Burkina Faso0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1——0 / 1——
Central African Republic100.00%Small sample150.00% · N 21 / 1————
Democratic Republic Of Congo0.00%Small sample140.00% · N 15———0 / 1—
Ecuador100.00%Small sample13.33% · N 30—1 / 1———
Guinea100.00%Small sample166.67% · N 31 / 1————
Israel100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 1———1 / 1—
Ivory Coast (Cote D'Ivoire)0.00%Small sample150.00% · N 2—0 / 1———
Libya100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 1———1 / 1—
Niger0.00%Small sample125.00% · N 4—0 / 1———
Palestine100.00%Small sample166.67% · N 31 / 1————
Sri Lanka100.00%Small sample144.44% · N 9———1 / 1—
Los Fresnos · PIS
Mexico0.00%Small sample120.00% · N 211—0 / 30 / 60 / 3—
Honduras0.00%Small sample72.76% · N 181—0 / 30 / 30 / 1—
Cuba0.00%Small sample53.45% · N 29—0 / 10 / 4——
El Salvador0.00%Small sample40.00% · N 124—0 / 10 / 3——
Venezuela50.00%Small sample412.68% · N 71—0 / 11 / 2—1 / 1
China50.00%Small sample26.67% · N 15——0 / 1—1 / 1
Colombia0.00%Small sample23.17% · N 63—0 / 10 / 1——
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample27.19% · N 306——0 / 2——
Guatemala0.00%Small sample13.03% · N 66—0 / 1———
India0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 4———0 / 1—
Liberia0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1—0 / 1———
Sudan0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 2—0 / 1———
Taiwan0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1——0 / 1——
Uganda0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1——0 / 1——
El Paso SPC
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample621.05% · N 76——0 / 50 / 1—
Venezuela25.00%Small sample414.29% · N 154——0 / 3—1 / 1
El Salvador0.00%Small sample21.59% · N 63———0 / 2—
Honduras0.00%Small sample23.54% · N 113——0 / 1—0 / 1
Turkiye50.00%Small sample233.33% · N 24——1 / 2——
Afghanistan0.00%Small sample160.87% · N 23————0 / 1
Colombia0.00%Small sample17.87% · N 89——0 / 1——
Cuba100.00%Small sample119.23% · N 52——1 / 1——
Mexico0.00%Small sample10.63% · N 158————0 / 1
Nigeria0.00%Small sample111.11% · N 9————0 / 1
Philippines0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1———0 / 1—
Conroe
Guatemala0.00%Small sample20.00% · N 131——0 / 10 / 1—
Honduras0.00%Small sample20.63% · N 318—0 / 2———
Ecuador0.00%Small sample12.63% · N 76——0 / 1——
El Salvador0.00%Small sample10.51% · N 195———0 / 1—
El Paso
Venezuela0.00%Small sample236.41% · N 714———0 / 2—
Aurora
Honduras0.00%Small sample17.32% · N 41————0 / 1
San Antonio
Colombia0.00%Small sample19.90% · N 313—0 / 1———

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Dallas · DAL · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Same count scale for both hearing types. Browse horizontally to see all 36 months.

Proceedings

Master Calendar Hearings

Individual / Merits Hearings

Months with no retained records show 0.

Retained schedule records exist outside the displayed months.

Monthly counts are available for all recorded courts below.

Aurora · AUR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Conroe · CIC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dallas · DAL

Monthly counts

Xiomara Diana Davis-Gumbs · XDD · Dallas · DAL · 2026-09–2029-08 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-08 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-096523334020
2026-101,3496769244
2026-111,0206153042
2026-127734440430
2027-015819127164
2027-025927534455
2027-0367710129986
2027-046629728282
2027-0551410019988
2027-0660210728392
2027-075529723283
2027-0845610416791
2027-09309939478
2027-10295749264
2027-11078068
2027-121156251
2028-01098087
2028-02083066
2028-030100084
2028-04080077
2028-05090073
2028-06073065
2028-07076070
2028-08086076
2028-09083082
2028-10033031
2028-11053043
2028-12030019
2029-01065059
2029-02071069
2029-03042039
2029-04022013
2029-05052049
2029-06029023
2029-070401
2029-080803

Retained: 11,512Excluded: 11,865Unable to confirm: 2Source files and checks

Elizabeth · ELZ

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

El Paso SPC · EPD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

LaSalle · JNA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Laredo · LRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

This judge code has an unresolved identity or name association. Its BIA row is unavailable; this is not a zero count.

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 297 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code XDD at Dallas in FY2021–FY2025, 81 were grants (27.27%) and 216 were denials (72.73%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 8 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

Why is FY2026 marked as a partial year?

Fiscal year 2026 runs from 2025-10-01 to 2026-09-30, and the source data end on 2026-08-31. FY2026 figures cover only part of the year, so they are not compared with complete years.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Where does this judge hear cases now?

EOIR’s official hearing directory, checked 2026-09-16, lists this name at Dallas.

Under this judge code, the 2026-08 EOIR edition records hearing dates from 2026-09 to 2029-08 at Dallas: 9,045 master and 2,456 individual proceedings.

A listing or a scheduled date does not establish a sole duty station.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

40,027Associated proceeding records
12,653Proceedings linked to asylum applications
6,191Eligible dated asylum records
946Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
20
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY1997
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2026 · Partial year
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 6,460 eligible asylum records have no completion date.
  • 8,278 eligible asylum records have no application result; 1,851 of them appear in the dated list. 6,427 records lack both a usable completion date and an application result. The missing-date and missing-result counts overlap.
  • 2 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

12,651 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

On the checked official listing

An official listing may include supervisory or multiple-court assignments; it does not establish a sole duty station.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Aurora

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
177
Other schedule types
68
Reliable asylum association
25
No identifiable asylum association
152

Conroe

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
534
Other schedule types
66
Reliable asylum association
123
No identifiable asylum association
411

Dallas

Retained: 11,512Excluded: 11,865Unable to confirm: 2

Raw Master and Individual records
23,379
Unconfirmed proportion
0.01%
Recorded handling reason
11,864
Recorded proceeding completion
1
Multiple future records without a handling reason
2
Historical schedule records
61,319
Future schedule records
23,383
Other schedule types
2,099
Retained records outside the displayed range
11
Reliable asylum association
36,350
No identifiable asylum association
48,351
Unlinked asylum records
1
Schedule and proceeding judge codes differ
2
Update precedes entry date
24

Elizabeth

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
518
Other schedule types
148
Reliable asylum association
155
No identifiable asylum association
363

El Paso SPC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,821
Other schedule types
450
Reliable asylum association
359
No identifiable asylum association
1,462

LaSalle

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
21
Reliable asylum association
4
No identifiable asylum association
17

Laredo

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
12
No identifiable asylum association
12

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
2,484
Other schedule types
422
Reliable asylum association
419
No identifiable asylum association
2,065
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: XDD · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY1997–FY2026 · Partial year: FY2026

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Judge Xiomara Diana Davis-Gumbs · Dallas Immigration Court asylum records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/xiomara-diana-davis-gumbs-xdd Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge