AsylumCompass
Saved
English

This historical identity has not been confirmed. Records cannot be attributed to this person.

From FY2021 to FY2025, 563 of 888 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code GRB at Las Vegas were grants (63.40%) and 325 were denials (36.60%). In the same years, the court recorded 62.07% and the national figure was 37.33%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Las Vegas · LVG

Grants 563 · Denials 325 · N 888
95% interval: 60.18%–66.51%

Judge code GRB
63.40%N 888
Las Vegas
62.07%N 3,190
United States · all courts
37.33%N 367,995

Among comparable judge codes at this court

5 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2021–FY2025. Their recorded grant shares range from 47.62% to 67.35%; the median is 63.40%.
FY2026 so far
11.36%44 records through 2026-08-31 · court: 8.91%
Record coverage
21 courts with recordsFY1996–FY2026 · 45 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Hearing dates on calendar
0 master · 871 individualLas Vegas · proceedings with hearing dates, 2026-09–2029-08Hearing schedule
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · not on the official listing checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Las Vegas

0%25%50%75%100%FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY20260.00%7.14%0.00%32.77%32.69%61.43%67.81%74.91%52.48%11.36%7.12%7.08%7.51%26.49%39.29%52.75%72.31%71.51%53.03%8.91%37.13%46.12%47.28%43.52%23.13%
  • Judge code GRB
  • Las Vegas
  • United States · all courts
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Las Vegas · LVGExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year11.36%Small sample445394.95%–23.98%
FY202552.48%24212711546.20%–58.68%
FY202474.91%2912187369.63%–79.55%
FY202367.81%2331587561.57%–73.48%
FY202261.43%Small sample70432749.72%–71.95%
FY202132.69%Small sample52173521.52%–46.24%
FY202032.77%119398024.99%–41.63%
FY20190.00%Small sample12012<0.01%–24.25%
FY20187.14%Small sample141131.27%–31.47%
FY20170.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20160.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20150.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20060.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20040.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20010.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY19980.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19960.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
Sacramento · SMOExplore this court's full context
FY20220.00%Small sample4040.00%–48.99%
Santa Ana · SNCExplore this court's full context
FY2022100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
Kansas City · KANExplore this court's full context
FY20208.51%Small sample474433.36%–19.93%
FY201914.86%1482212610.03%–21.48%
FY201815.83%1392211710.69%–22.80%
FY201728.33%Small sample60174318.51%–40.77%
FY201622.58%Small sample62144813.96%–34.41%
FY201535.00%Small sample2071318.12%–56.71%
FY20130.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20110.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20100.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
El Paso SPC · EPDExplore this court's full context
FY201920.00%Small sample5143.62%–62.45%
Imperial · IMPExplore this court's full context
FY20190.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
El Paso · ELPExplore this court's full context
FY201875.00%Small sample43130.06%–95.44%
Dallas · DALExplore this court's full context
FY201833.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%
Oakdale · OAKExplore this court's full context
FY201850.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%
Tacoma · TACExplore this court's full context
FY20180.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Cleveland · CLEExplore this court's full context
FY201723.68%Small sample3892912.99%–39.21%
Adelanto · ADLExplore this court's full context
FY201727.27%Small sample11389.75%–56.56%
Fort Snelling · BLMExplore this court's full context
FY20170.00%Small sample8080.00%–32.44%
LaSalle · JNAExplore this court's full context
FY20170.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
Chicago · CHIExplore this court's full context
FY201750.00%Small sample42215.00%–85.00%
Laredo · LROExplore this court's full context
FY20170.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Omaha · OMAExplore this court's full context
FY20160.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
Salt Lake City · SLCExplore this court's full context
FY201520.00%Small sample204168.07%–41.60%
Aurora · AURExplore this court's full context
FY201525.00%Small sample8267.15%–59.07%
Los Fresnos · PISExplore this court's full context
FY201525.00%Small sample4134.56%–69.94%
Pearsall · PSDExplore this court's full context
FY201550.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationalityFY2021–FY2025 · pooledTotal (N)Court · same nationalityFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Las Vegas
Cuba93.51%37094.34% · N 1,29079 / 90165 / 17192 / 989 / 101 / 1
Venezuela72.82%10372.84% · N 24319 / 3224 / 3014 / 2014 / 154 / 6
Nicaragua40.54%Small sample7466.30% · N 2709 / 357 / 138 / 205 / 51 / 1
Mexico10.34%Small sample588.83% · N 2831 / 160 / 123 / 141 / 71 / 9
El Salvador17.31%Small sample5215.03% · N 1931 / 54 / 81 / 170 / 43 / 18
Guatemala17.95%Small sample3913.46% · N 1560 / 121 / 66 / 160 / 40 / 1
Colombia7.69%Small sample2614.74% · N 950 / 90 / 102 / 5—0 / 2
Honduras26.32%Small sample199.84% · N 1220 / 41 / 62 / 71 / 11 / 1
Russia88.89%Small sample1889.80% · N 495 / 55 / 76 / 6——
China50.00%Small sample1268.75% · N 641 / 20 / 13 / 32 / 40 / 2
Turkiye40.00%Small sample1042.86% · N 14—1 / 22 / 21 / 6—
Jordan22.22%Small sample945.45% · N 222 / 9————
Cameroon75.00%Small sample878.57% · N 14—1 / 22 / 22 / 21 / 2
Ethiopia100.00%Small sample778.57% · N 282 / 2—2 / 23 / 3—
Nigeria100.00%Small sample790.91% · N 11—4 / 43 / 3——
Peru14.29%Small sample710.20% · N 490 / 30 / 21 / 10 / 1—
Egypt50.00%Small sample640.00% · N 100 / 3—3 / 3——
Armenia100.00%Small sample5100.00% · N 173 / 3—2 / 2——
Georgia0.00%Small sample510.00% · N 100 / 20 / 3———
Iraq100.00%Small sample484.62% · N 13——4 / 4——
Jamaica25.00%Small sample425.00% · N 4——1 / 20 / 10 / 1
Chile33.33%Small sample325.00% · N 8—0 / 11 / 2——
Senegal33.33%Small sample340.00% · N 101 / 10 / 10 / 1——
Syria100.00%Small sample3100.00% · N 5———3 / 3—
Afghanistan100.00%Small sample277.78% · N 91 / 1———1 / 1
Bangladesh0.00%Small sample260.00% · N 50 / 2————
Ghana0.00%Small sample220.00% · N 5————0 / 2
India50.00%Small sample247.37% · N 191 / 1—0 / 1——
Iran100.00%Small sample277.78% · N 9————2 / 2
Mauritania0.00%Small sample257.14% · N 70 / 10 / 1———
Romania50.00%Small sample225.00% · N 41 / 1——0 / 1—
Sri Lanka100.00%Small sample2100.00% · N 7—1 / 1——1 / 1
Ukraine100.00%Small sample2100.00% · N 5—1 / 1——1 / 1
Bosnia-Herzegovina0.00%Small sample150.00% · N 2————0 / 1
Brazil0.00%Small sample150.00% · N 100 / 1————
Chad0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1—0 / 1———
Congo0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 2—0 / 1———
Costa Rica100.00%Small sample150.00% · N 2—1 / 1———
Democratic Republic Of Congo0.00%Small sample133.33% · N 3—0 / 1———
Dominican Republic0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1—0 / 1———
Ecuador0.00%Small sample114.29% · N 7——0 / 1——
Guinea100.00%Small sample150.00% · N 2———1 / 1—
Haiti0.00%Small sample125.00% · N 4—0 / 1———
Moldavia (Moldova)100.00%Small sample133.33% · N 3—1 / 1———
Netherlands Antilles0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1——0 / 1——
Philippines0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 5———0 / 1—
Saudi Arabia0.00%Small sample150.00% · N 2—0 / 1———
Somalia100.00%Small sample133.33% · N 3———1 / 1—
Spain100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 1—1 / 1———
Uruguay100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 51 / 1————
Yemen0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 10 / 1————
Sacramento · SMO
Mexico0.00%Small sample426.45% · N 484———0 / 4—
Santa Ana
Cuba100.00%Small sample135.71% · N 42———1 / 1—

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Las Vegas · LVG · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Same count scale for both hearing types. Browse horizontally to see all 36 months.

Proceedings

Master Calendar Hearings · 0 proceedings with recorded hearing dates

Individual / Merits Hearings

Months with no retained records show 0.

Retained schedule records exist outside the displayed months.

Monthly counts are available for all recorded courts below.

Adelanto · ADL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Aurora · AUR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Fort Snelling · BLM

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Chicago · CHI

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Cleveland · CLE

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dallas · DAL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

El Paso · ELP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

El Paso SPC · EPD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

LaSalle · JNA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Kansas City · KAN

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Las Vegas · LVG

Monthly counts

Glen R. Baker · GRB · Las Vegas · LVG · 2026-09–2029-08 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-08 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-090000
2026-100000
2026-110000
2026-120000
2027-010000
2027-020000
2027-030000
2027-040000
2027-050000
2027-060000
2027-070000
2027-080000
2027-09019019
2027-10035035
2027-11036034
2027-12031030
2028-01043037
2028-02029028
2028-03042038
2028-04045042
2028-05046046
2028-06026026
2028-07044042
2028-08033032
2028-09047047
2028-10043043
2028-11027025
2028-12035033
2029-01039035
2029-02030030
2029-03038034
2029-04035035
2029-05040033
2029-06034031
2029-07038034
2029-08036028

Retained: 1,024Excluded: 924Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New York - Federal Plaza · NYC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Omaha · OMA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Otero · OTO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Salt Lake City · SLC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Sacramento · SMO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

San Diego · SND

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Tacoma · TAC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

Denominator: respondent-filed BIA IJ Case Appeal events with an exact proceeding link and stored judge code, with a recorded disposition during the displayed period.

Respondent-filed recorded BIA appeal events during FY2021–FY2025
Appeal events (denominator)DIS · recorded dismissal/affirmanceREM · remand as recordedSUS · appeal sustained as recordedOther · mixed recorded dispositions
32818368077

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 888 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code GRB at Las Vegas in FY2021–FY2025, 563 were grants (63.40%) and 325 were denials (36.60%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 21 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

Why is FY2026 marked as a partial year?

Fiscal year 2026 runs from 2025-10-01 to 2026-09-30, and the source data end on 2026-08-31. FY2026 figures cover only part of the year, so they are not compared with complete years.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Where does this judge hear cases now?

This name is not on EOIR’s official hearing directory as checked on 2026-09-16.

Under this judge code, the 2026-08 EOIR edition records hearing dates from 2026-09 to 2029-08 at Las Vegas: 0 master and 871 individual proceedings.

A listing or a scheduled date does not establish a sole duty station.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

22,567Associated proceeding records
6,465Proceedings linked to asylum applications
4,655Eligible dated asylum records
1,696Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
26
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY1996
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2026 · Partial year
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 1,804 eligible asylum records have no completion date.
  • 2,186 eligible asylum records have no application result; 401 of them appear in the dated list. 1,785 records lack both a usable completion date and an application result. The missing-date and missing-result counts overlap.
  • 6 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

6,459 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

Not on the checked official listing

The checked listing does not establish why this name is absent or where this person works now.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Adelanto · ADL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
53
Other schedule types
7
Reliable asylum association
35
No identifiable asylum association
18

Aurora

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
55
Other schedule types
1
Reliable asylum association
21
No identifiable asylum association
34

Fort Snelling

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
46
Other schedule types
3
Reliable asylum association
25
No identifiable asylum association
21

Chicago

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
55
Other schedule types
4
Reliable asylum association
23
No identifiable asylum association
32

Cleveland

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,560
Other schedule types
347
Reliable asylum association
330
No identifiable asylum association
1,230

Dallas

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
134
Other schedule types
19
Reliable asylum association
25
No identifiable asylum association
109

El Paso

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
88
Reliable asylum association
15
No identifiable asylum association
73

El Paso SPC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
20
Other schedule types
7
Reliable asylum association
10
No identifiable asylum association
10

LaSalle

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
3
Other schedule types
2
Reliable asylum association
1
No identifiable asylum association
2

Kansas City

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
24,887
Other schedule types
1,618
Reliable asylum association
8,866
No identifiable asylum association
16,021

Las Vegas

Retained: 1,024Excluded: 924Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
1,948
Unconfirmed proportion
0.00%
Recorded handling reason
924
Historical schedule records
38,019
Future schedule records
1,948
Other schedule types
1,688
Retained records outside the displayed range
153
Reliable asylum association
19,526
No identifiable asylum association
20,441
Schedule and proceeding judge codes differ
2

New York - Federal Plaza

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
774
Reliable asylum association
627
No identifiable asylum association
147

Omaha

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
51
Other schedule types
21
Reliable asylum association
18
No identifiable asylum association
33

Otero

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
18
Other schedule types
4
Reliable asylum association
5
No identifiable asylum association
13

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
48
Other schedule types
8
Reliable asylum association
6
No identifiable asylum association
42

Pearsall

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
48
Other schedule types
12
Reliable asylum association
12
No identifiable asylum association
36

Salt Lake City

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
2,839
Other schedule types
222
Reliable asylum association
1,053
No identifiable asylum association
1,786

Sacramento · SMO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
481
Other schedule types
5
Reliable asylum association
276
No identifiable asylum association
205

San Diego

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
82
Other schedule types
34
Reliable asylum association
27
No identifiable asylum association
55

Tacoma

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
186
Other schedule types
73
Reliable asylum association
45
No identifiable asylum association
141
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: GRB · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY1996–FY2026 · Partial year: FY2026

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Glen R. Baker: historical immigration judge code records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/glen-r-baker-grb Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge