Huy Le — Historical EOIR code records

This historical identity has not been confirmed. Records cannot be attributed to this person.

In FY2026 through 2026-08-31 (a partial year), 30 of 111 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code HUL at Chelmsford were grants (27.03%) and 81 were denials (72.97%). In the same period, the court recorded 13.38%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Chelmsford · CHE

Period

27.03%Grants 30 · Denials 81 · N 111
95% interval: 19.64%–35.95%

Judge code HUL: 27.03%N 111
Chelmsford: 13.38%N 792; No court figure for this period
United States · all courts: No national figure is published for this period

Among comparable judge codes at this court

5 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2026. Their recorded grant shares range from 5.07% to 27.03%; the median is 18.62%.

Compare judges at this court

Record coverage: 5 courts with recordsFY2020–FY2026 · 9 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Hearing dates on calendar: 4,960 master · 1,795 individualChelmsford · proceedings with hearing dates, 2026-09–2029-08Hearing schedule
Data through: 2026-08-31EOIR records · not on the official listing checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Chelmsford

Judge code HUL
Chelmsford
United States · all courts

National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.

Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FY	Recorded grant share	Total (N)	Grant records	Denial records	95% interval
Chelmsford · CHE Explore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year	27.03%	111	30	81	19.64%–35.95%
FY2025	48.00%Small sample	75	36	39	37.07%–59.13%
Pearsall · PSD Explore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year	20.00%Small sample	5	1	4	3.62%–62.45%
FY2025	0.00%Small sample	2	0	2	0.00%–65.76%
Annandale · ANN Explore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year	0.00%Small sample	1	0	1	0.00%–79.35%
FY2025	0.00%Small sample	1	0	1	0.00%–79.35%
Chelmsford · LOW Explore this court's full context
FY2024	0.00%Small sample	1	0	1	0.00%–79.35%
Boston · BOS Explore this court's full context
FY2023	0.00%Small sample	1	0	1	0.00%–79.35%
FY2020	100.00%Small sample	3	3	0	43.85%–100.00%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationality	FY2021–FY2025 · pooled	Total (N)	Court · same nationality	FY2025	FY2024	FY2023	FY2022	FY2021
Chelmsford · CHE
Brazil	26.09%Small sample	23	19.10% · N 534	6 / 23	—	—	—	—
Guatemala	43.75%Small sample	16	39.05% · N 420	7 / 16	—	—	—	—
Ecuador	37.50%Small sample	8	33.08% · N 133	3 / 8	—	—	—	—
Angola	100.00%Small sample	7	59.20% · N 125	7 / 7	—	—	—	—
Democratic Republic Of Congo	75.00%Small sample	4	70.42% · N 71	3 / 4	—	—	—	—
Haiti	0.00%Small sample	4	13.04% · N 46	0 / 4	—	—	—	—
Colombia	100.00%Small sample	3	38.64% · N 44	3 / 3	—	—	—	—
India	100.00%Small sample	2	45.00% · N 20	2 / 2	—	—	—	—
Cameroon	100.00%Small sample	1	90.48% · N 21	1 / 1	—	—	—	—
Cape Verde	0.00%Small sample	1	0.00% · N 7	0 / 1	—	—	—	—
Chile	0.00%Small sample	1	25.00% · N 4	0 / 1	—	—	—	—
China	100.00%Small sample	1	25.00% · N 12	1 / 1	—	—	—	—
El Salvador	100.00%Small sample	1	42.28% · N 123	1 / 1	—	—	—	—
Mexico	0.00%Small sample	1	5.26% · N 19	0 / 1	—	—	—	—
Nepal	100.00%Small sample	1	100.00% · N 3	1 / 1	—	—	—	—
Venezuela	100.00%Small sample	1	41.38% · N 29	1 / 1	—	—	—	—
Pearsall
Cuba	0.00%Small sample	1	28.37% · N 141	0 / 1	—	—	—	—
Nicaragua	0.00%Small sample	1	15.04% · N 113	0 / 1	—	—	—	—
Annandale · ANN
Ecuador	0.00%Small sample	1	8.82% · N 34	0 / 1	—	—	—	—
Boston · BOS
Guatemala	0.00%Small sample	1	55.08% · N 1,643	—	—	0 / 1	—	—
Chelmsford · LOW
Turkiye	0.00%Small sample	1	50.00% · N 6	—	0 / 1	—	—	—

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

View monthly counts

Same count scale for both hearing types. Browse horizontally to see all 36 months.

Proceedings

Master Calendar Hearings

Individual / Merits Hearings

Months with no retained records show 0.

Annandale · ANN

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Chelmsford · CHE

Monthly counts

Huy Le · HUL · Chelmsford · CHE · 2026-09–2029-08 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-08 edition
Month	All proceedings · Master proceedings	All proceedings · Individual proceedings	Asylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedings	Asylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-09	595	16	312	13
2026-10	480	70	313	56
2026-11	254	52	155	40
2026-12	0	49	0	41
2027-01	226	62	47	54
2027-02	286	45	58	30
2027-03	393	56	41	40
2027-04	385	69	69	56
2027-05	302	55	36	45
2027-06	235	54	117	48
2027-07	249	61	101	48
2027-08	373	82	27	78
2027-09	166	71	18	57
2027-10	69	64	1	44
2027-11	0	76	0	66
2027-12	70	65	49	62
2028-01	195	71	152	58
2028-02	214	52	179	42
2028-03	169	55	93	47
2028-04	43	52	19	45
2028-05	4	72	0	58
2028-06	0	70	0	62
2028-07	19	56	15	48
2028-08	20	81	6	72
2028-09	40	77	31	66
2028-10	44	59	40	48
2028-11	26	63	17	57
2028-12	14	70	8	63
2029-01	89	70	44	42
2029-02	0	0	0	0
2029-03	0	0	0	0
2029-04	0	0	0	0
2029-05	0	0	0	0
2029-06	0	0	0	0
2029-07	0	0	0	0
2029-08	0	0	0	0

Retained: 6,755Excluded: 1,756Unable to confirm: 7Source files and checks

Chelmsford · LOW

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Historical record court

Saved application result

Completion fiscal year

Completed on or after

Completed on or before

Results for the current selection

Change filters

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Granted
Denied
Recorded as abandoned
Recorded as withdrawn
Recorded as not adjudicated
Recorded as administratively closed
Other recorded categories
No application result recorded

Bar length shows total records, not grant share. Inspect a month to see every result category. Use arrow keys to explore values; Home and End jump to the first and last.

Exact monthly record counts
Calendar month	Granted	Denied	Recorded as abandoned	Recorded as withdrawn	Recorded as not adjudicated	Recorded as administratively closed	Other recorded categories	No application result recorded	Total records	Grant or denial results (N)	Recorded grant share

Grant share = grants ÷ (grants + denials). Other categories are excluded; a zero denominator is not calculable.

Empty months mean no eligible source rows in this selection, not verified inactivity.

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record court	Fiscal year	Granted	Denied	Recorded as abandoned	Recorded as withdrawn	Recorded as not adjudicated	Recorded as administratively closed	Other recorded categories	No application result recorded	Total records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion date	Historical record court	Saved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

No qualifying respondent-filed BIA appeal events are recorded for this judge code in the displayed population and period. This does not establish no service or no decisions.

About these records

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 111 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code HUL at Chelmsford in FY2026, 30 were grants (27.03%) and 81 were denials (72.97%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 5 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

Why is FY2026 marked as a partial year?

Fiscal year 2026 runs from 2025-10-01 to 2026-09-30, and the source data end on 2026-08-31. FY2026 figures cover only part of the year, so they are not compared with complete years.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Where does this judge hear cases now?

This name is not on EOIR’s official hearing directory as checked on 2026-09-16.

Under this judge code, the 2026-08 EOIR edition records hearing dates from 2026-09 to 2029-08 at Chelmsford: 4,960 master and 1,795 individual proceedings.

A listing or a scheduled date does not establish a sole duty station.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Find qualified legal help

Data and sources

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

10,385Associated proceeding records

5,306Proceedings linked to asylum applications

963Eligible dated asylum records

200Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts: 12
Earliest recorded completion FY: FY2013
Latest recorded completion FY: FY2026 · Partial year

Why some source records are outside the dated results

4,341 eligible asylum records have no completion date.
4,536 eligible asylum records have no application result; 257 of them appear in the dated list. 4,279 records lack both a usable completion date and an application result. The missing-date and missing-result counts overlap.
2 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

5,304 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Coverage counts Source files and checks

Official court listing

Directory checked: 2026-09-16EOIR hearing directory

Not on the checked official listing

The checked listing does not establish why this name is absent or where this person works now.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Annandale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records: 0
Unconfirmed proportion: Not calculable
Historical schedule records: 21
Reliable asylum association: 9
No identifiable asylum association: 12

Chelmsford

Retained: 6,755Excluded: 1,756Unable to confirm: 7

Raw Master and Individual records: 8,518
Unconfirmed proportion: 0.08%
Recorded handling reason: 1,756
Multiple records for the same proceeding and time: 1
Multiple future records without a handling reason: 6
Historical schedule records: 11,809
Future schedule records: 8,528
Other schedule types: 496
Reliable asylum association: 11,319
No identifiable asylum association: 9,017
Unlinked asylum records: 1
Schedule and proceeding judge codes differ: 12

Chelmsford

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records: 0
Unconfirmed proportion: Not calculable
Historical schedule records: 1
Reliable asylum association: 1

Pearsall

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records: 0
Unconfirmed proportion: Not calculable
Historical schedule records: 140
Other schedule types: 1
Reliable asylum association: 39
No identifiable asylum association: 101

View schedule counting rules

Source files, versions and checks

Source files and checks · Attribution details

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: HUL · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Download certified judge-code BIA aggregates · Companion manifest · Read disclosure certificate · Methods

By historical court and period BIA appeal outcomes by year Data package changes

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY2013–FY2026 · Partial year: FY2026

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff2026-08-31

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Official FOIA library Original CASE ZIP · about 4.55 GB EOIR code key Edition details and fingerprint

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition: 2026-09-14

Official source recheck · 2026-09-16

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Official judge hearing directory

Used on this page: Checked judge names, roles and court listings

Saved observation date2026-09-16

Official source website Edition details and fingerprint

Official source recheck

No later source recheck recorded for this edition

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Huy Le: historical immigration judge code records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/huy-le-hul Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Huy Le — Historical EOIR code records

Historical outcomes by court

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Chelmsford

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Hearing schedule

Master Calendar Hearings

Individual / Merits Hearings

Annandale · ANN

Chelmsford · CHE

Monthly counts

Chelmsford · LOW

Pearsall · PSD

Dated result records

Results for the current selection

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

Why do other websites show a different number?

Why are courts listed separately?

Why is FY2026 marked as a partial year?

What does a small sample mean here?

Where does this judge hear cases now?

Can these numbers predict my case?

Data and sources

Result record coverage

Available historical coverage

Official court listing

Hearing schedule sources

Annandale

Chelmsford

Chelmsford

Pearsall

BIA appeal sources

Source versions and checks

Continue from this judge

Other judges on the official listing at Chelmsford