AsylumCompass
Saved
English

This historical identity has not been confirmed. Records cannot be attributed to this person.

In FY2018, 2 of 103 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code JLR at Las Vegas were grants (1.94%) and 101 were denials (98.06%). That year, the court recorded 7.08%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Las Vegas · LVG

Grants 2 · Denials 101 · N 103
95% interval: 0.53%–6.81%

Judge code JLR
1.94%N 103
Las Vegas
7.08%N 551
United States · all courts
No national figure is published for this period

Among comparable judge codes at this court

Fewer than 5 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2018, so no comparison among judge codes is drawn.

Record coverage
20 courts with recordsFY1987–FY2022 · 73 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · not on the official listing checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Las Vegas

0%25%50%75%100%FY2013FY2014FY2015FY2016FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY202210.67%6.12%2.56%5.95%2.78%1.94%11.11%0.00%11.71%8.06%1.96%5.24%7.12%7.08%7.51%26.49%39.29%52.75%37.13%46.12%
  • Judge code JLR
  • Las Vegas
  • United States · all courts
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Las Vegas · LVGExplore this court's full context
FY20220.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY201911.11%Small sample182163.10%–32.80%
FY20181.94%10321010.53%–6.81%
FY20172.78%10831050.95%–7.85%
FY20165.95%Small sample845792.57%–13.19%
FY20152.56%Small sample782760.71%–8.88%
FY20146.12%Small sample986922.84%–12.72%
FY201310.67%Small sample758675.50%–19.66%
FY201214.29%Small sample639547.70%–24.97%
FY201125.53%Small sample47123515.25%–39.51%
FY201066.67%Small sample32120.77%–93.85%
FY200960.00%Small sample53223.07%–88.24%
FY20070.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20040.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19980.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19970.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19890.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
San Diego · SNDExplore this court's full context
FY2022100.00%Small sample99070.09%–100.00%
FY202140.43%Small sample47192827.64%–54.66%
FY202010.34%232242087.05%–14.93%
FY20199.04%166151515.55%–14.37%
FY201822.22%Small sample3682811.72%–38.08%
FY201716.67%Small sample6153.01%–56.35%
FY2014100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
FY20100.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20050.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20010.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19980.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Oakdale · OAKExplore this court's full context
FY202150.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%
FY202014.29%Small sample426366.72%–27.84%
Otay Mesa · OTMExplore this court's full context
FY20210.00%Small sample606<0.01%–39.03%
FY202025.00%Small sample8267.15%–59.07%
FY20190.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20180.00%Small sample8080.00%–32.44%
West Los Angeles Immigration Court · WLAExplore this court's full context
FY20180.00%Small sample270270.00%–12.46%
FY2017100.00%Small sample22034.24%–100.00%
FY200733.33%Small sample6249.68%–70.00%
FY200616.82%107188910.91%–25.03%
FY200525.29%1704312719.36%–32.32%
FY200411.24%178201587.39%–16.72%
FY200319.28%1663213414.00%–25.95%
FY200226.32%Small sample57154216.65%–38.98%
FY19980.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19970.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19960.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY19870.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Cleveland · CLEExplore this court's full context
FY20180.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
FY20099.09%Small sample111101.62%–37.74%
FY200830.21%Small sample96296721.93%–40.01%
Los Fresnos · PISExplore this court's full context
FY20170.00%Small sample606<0.01%–39.03%
LaSalle · JNAExplore this court's full context
FY20170.00%Small sample5050.00%–43.45%
Kansas City · KANExplore this court's full context
FY201660.00%Small sample53223.07%–88.24%
FY20150.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
Sacramento · SMOExplore this court's full context
FY201544.44%Small sample94518.88%–73.33%
FY201428.57%Small sample7258.22%–64.11%
FY201318.18%Small sample11295.14%–47.70%
FY201236.36%Small sample114715.17%–64.62%
FY201125.00%Small sample4134.56%–69.94%
FY19990.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Salt Lake City · SLCExplore this court's full context
FY20130.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Imperial · IMPExplore this court's full context
FY201120.00%Small sample10285.67%–50.98%
Phoenix · PHOExplore this court's full context
FY2011100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
Florence · FLOExplore this court's full context
FY20100.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20090.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
Eloy · ELOExplore this court's full context
FY20100.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Elizabeth · ELZExplore this court's full context
FY20090.00%Small sample100100.00%–27.75%
FY200825.93%Small sample2772013.17%–44.68%
Philadelphia · PHIExplore this court's full context
FY20090.00%Small sample8080.00%–32.44%
FY20080.00%Small sample210210.00%–15.46%
New York - Federal Plaza · NYCExplore this court's full context
FY200838.89%Small sample1871120.31%–61.38%
FY200726.09%Small sample2361712.55%–46.47%
Baltimore · BALExplore this court's full context
FY20080.00%Small sample606<0.01%–39.03%
Hartford · HARExplore this court's full context
FY200833.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationalityFY2021–FY2025 · pooledTotal (N)Court · same nationalityFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
San Diego
Guatemala0.00%Small sample1013.67% · N 512————0 / 10
Honduras22.22%Small sample934.41% · N 93————2 / 9
Mexico0.00%Small sample811.98% · N 409————0 / 8
Iraq100.00%Small sample681.91% · N 94———1 / 15 / 5
Cuba100.00%Small sample480.00% · N 20————4 / 4
Nicaragua100.00%Small sample450.44% · N 113———4 / 4—
El Salvador66.67%Small sample327.78% · N 72————2 / 3
Russia100.00%Small sample387.47% · N 375———3 / 3—
Vietnam100.00%Small sample357.50% · N 40————3 / 3
Ecuador0.00%Small sample213.33% · N 30————0 / 2
Cameroon100.00%Small sample175.86% · N 29————1 / 1
Ethiopia100.00%Small sample167.57% · N 37————1 / 1
India100.00%Small sample143.59% · N 39———1 / 1—
Lebanon100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 1————1 / 1
Otay Mesa
Mexico0.00%Small sample21.49% · N 201————0 / 2
Cameroon0.00%Small sample155.00% · N 20————0 / 1
El Salvador0.00%Small sample15.88% · N 68————0 / 1
Israel0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 2————0 / 1
Pakistan0.00%Small sample122.22% · N 9————0 / 1
Oakdale
Cameroon50.00%Small sample237.89% · N 95————1 / 2
Las Vegas
Guatemala0.00%Small sample113.46% · N 156———0 / 1—

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Adelanto · ADL · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Adelanto · ADL

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Baltimore · BAL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Cleveland · CLE

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dallas · DAL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Eloy · ELO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Elizabeth · ELZ

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Florence · FLO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Hartford · HAR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Imperial · IMP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Kansas City · KAN

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Las Vegas · LVG

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New York - Federal Plaza · NYC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Oakdale · OAK

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Otay Mesa · OTM

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Philadelphia · PHI

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Phoenix · PHO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

San Francisco · SFR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Salt Lake City · SLC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Sacramento · SMO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

San Diego · SND

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Annandale · WAS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

West Los Angeles Immigration Court · WLA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

Denominator: respondent-filed BIA IJ Case Appeal events with an exact proceeding link and stored judge code, with a recorded disposition during the displayed period.

Respondent-filed recorded BIA appeal events during FY2021–FY2025
Appeal events (denominator)DIS · recorded dismissal/affirmanceREM · remand as recordedSUS · appeal sustained as recordedOther · mixed recorded dispositions
30017851071

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 103 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code JLR at Las Vegas in FY2018, 2 were grants (1.94%) and 101 were denials (98.06%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 20 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

18,594Associated proceeding records
5,631Proceedings linked to asylum applications
5,616Eligible dated asylum records
2,282Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
23
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY1987
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2022
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 47 eligible asylum records have no application result; 47 of them appear in the dated list.
  • 15 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

5,616 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

Not on the checked official listing

The checked listing does not establish why this name is absent or where this person works now.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Adelanto · ADL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
80
No identifiable asylum association
80

Baltimore

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
178
Other schedule types
39
Reliable asylum association
24
No identifiable asylum association
154

Cleveland

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,032
Other schedule types
43
Reliable asylum association
458
No identifiable asylum association
574

Dallas

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
9
Other schedule types
1
Reliable asylum association
2
No identifiable asylum association
7

Eloy

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
54
Other schedule types
17
Reliable asylum association
5
No identifiable asylum association
49

Elizabeth

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
999
Other schedule types
130
Reliable asylum association
163
No identifiable asylum association
836

Florence

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
61
Other schedule types
32
Reliable asylum association
11
No identifiable asylum association
50

Hartford

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
29
Other schedule types
6
Reliable asylum association
22
No identifiable asylum association
7

Imperial

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
282
Other schedule types
40
Reliable asylum association
63
No identifiable asylum association
219

Kansas City

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
358
Other schedule types
28
Reliable asylum association
104
No identifiable asylum association
254

Las Vegas

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
27,891
Other schedule types
2,317
Reliable asylum association
7,611
No identifiable asylum association
20,280

New York - Federal Plaza

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
723
Other schedule types
516
Reliable asylum association
346
No identifiable asylum association
377

Oakdale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
145
Other schedule types
24
Reliable asylum association
82
No identifiable asylum association
63

Otay Mesa

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
588
Other schedule types
289
Reliable asylum association
143
No identifiable asylum association
445

Philadelphia

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
943
Other schedule types
5
Reliable asylum association
295
No identifiable asylum association
648

Phoenix

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
18
Reliable asylum association
3
No identifiable asylum association
15

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
109
Other schedule types
27
Reliable asylum association
18
No identifiable asylum association
91

San Francisco · SFR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
6
Reliable asylum association
6

Salt Lake City

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
46
Other schedule types
3
Reliable asylum association
9
No identifiable asylum association
37

Sacramento · SMO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,819
Other schedule types
9
Reliable asylum association
407
No identifiable asylum association
1,412

San Diego

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
15,079
Other schedule types
37
Reliable asylum association
7,483
No identifiable asylum association
7,596

Annandale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1
Reliable asylum association
1

West Los Angeles Immigration Court · WLA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
15,403
Other schedule types
14,549
Reliable asylum association
11,537
No identifiable asylum association
3,811
Unlinked asylum records
55
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: JLR · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY1987–FY2022

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Jeffrey L. Romig: historical immigration judge code records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/jeffrey-l-romig-jlr Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge