AsylumCompass
Saved
English

From FY2021 to FY2025, 94 of 434 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code LCA at Annandale were grants (21.66%) and 340 were denials (78.34%). In the same years, the court recorded 21.83% and the national figure was 37.33%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Annandale · ANN

Grants 94 · Denials 340 · N 434
95% interval: 18.04%–25.77%

Judge code LCA
21.66%N 434
Annandale
21.83%N 4,824
United States · all courts
37.33%N 367,995

Among comparable judge codes at this court

22 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2021–FY2025. Their recorded grant shares range from 3.96% to 54.55%; the median is 20.04%.
FY2026 so far
10.07%288 records through 2026-08-31 · court: 13.20%
Record coverage
12 courts with recordsFY1996–FY2026 · 43 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Hearing dates on calendar
62 master · 752 individualAnnandale · proceedings with hearing dates, 2026-09–2029-08Hearing schedule
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · official listing: Annandale, checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Annandale

0%10%20%30%40%50%FY2025FY202621.66%10.07%21.74%13.20%23.13%
  • Judge code LCA
  • Annandale
  • United States · all courts
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Annandale · ANNExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year10.07%288292597.10%–14.09%
FY202521.66%4349434018.04%–25.77%
New York - Federal Plaza · NYCExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year0.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY2025100.00%Small sample33043.85%–100.00%
FY20240.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY202366.04%Small sample53351852.59%–77.31%
FY202263.70%2701729857.81%–69.21%
FY202156.00%Small sample50282242.31%–68.84%
FY2020100.00%Small sample22034.24%–100.00%
FY20190.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20180.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20140.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20130.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20110.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20100.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20060.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20050.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20040.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY19980.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Annandale · WASExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year0.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY202520.59%Small sample3472710.35%–36.80%
FY202429.17%2166315323.51%–35.55%
FY202343.08%Small sample65283731.76%–55.17%
FY20200.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20190.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20180.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY2013100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
FY20060.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20000.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19980.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19970.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY19960.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Newark · NEWExplore this court's full context
FY20250.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Sterling · STEExplore this court's full context
FY20250.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Hyattsville · HYAExplore this court's full context
FY20240.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Otero · OTOExplore this court's full context
FY20240.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Sacramento · SMOExplore this court's full context
FY2024100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
Philadelphia · PHIExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
Denver · DENExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
New York - Varick · NYVExplore this court's full context
FY20220.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20200.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Boston · BOSExplore this court's full context
FY2021100.00%Small sample22034.24%–100.00%
FY202050.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationalityFY2021–FY2025 · pooledTotal (N)Court · same nationalityFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Annandale · ANN
Bolivia10.53%Small sample7612.24% · N 5318 / 76————
Honduras22.81%Small sample5719.56% · N 76713 / 57————
Peru18.75%Small sample4812.77% · N 5019 / 48————
El Salvador16.28%Small sample4321.26% · N 7157 / 43————
Afghanistan73.91%Small sample2372.45% · N 9817 / 23————
Turkiye50.00%Small sample2238.00% · N 10011 / 22————
Mauritania0.00%Small sample2017.50% · N 1600 / 20————
Nicaragua26.32%Small sample1926.70% · N 2215 / 19————
Guatemala18.75%Small sample1615.87% · N 3783 / 16————
Ethiopia33.33%Small sample1556.31% · N 1035 / 15————
Mexico0.00%Small sample113.23% · N 1550 / 11————
China10.00%Small sample1048.89% · N 451 / 10————
Colombia0.00%Small sample915.17% · N 1780 / 9————
Venezuela0.00%Small sample828.71% · N 2020 / 8————
Russia85.71%Small sample768.42% · N 576 / 7————
Egypt40.00%Small sample525.00% · N 442 / 5————
India0.00%Small sample413.33% · N 300 / 4————
Iran100.00%Small sample453.33% · N 154 / 4————
Nigeria0.00%Small sample416.67% · N 60 / 4————
Brazil0.00%Small sample30.00% · N 140 / 3————
Burkina Faso0.00%Small sample329.41% · N 340 / 3————
Senegal0.00%Small sample30.00% · N 150 / 3————
Cameroon0.00%Small sample258.82% · N 170 / 2————
Kazakhstan0.00%Small sample242.86% · N 70 / 2————
Nepal0.00%Small sample216.67% · N 180 / 2————
Sudan50.00%Small sample250.00% · N 81 / 2————
Vietnam0.00%Small sample28.33% · N 120 / 2————
Bangladesh0.00%Small sample129.63% · N 270 / 1————
Djibouti0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 10 / 1————
Eritrea0.00%Small sample128.57% · N 140 / 1————
Georgia0.00%Small sample150.00% · N 120 / 1————
Ghana0.00%Small sample120.00% · N 250 / 1————
Guinea100.00%Small sample133.33% · N 91 / 1————
Jamaica0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 150 / 1————
Morocco0.00%Small sample118.18% · N 110 / 1————
Pakistan0.00%Small sample120.00% · N 250 / 1————
Paraguay100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 11 / 1————
Somalia0.00%Small sample135.29% · N 170 / 1————
Tajikistan (Tadzhik)0.00%Small sample150.00% · N 60 / 1————
Turkmenistan0.00%Small sample166.67% · N 90 / 1————
Uzbekistan0.00%Small sample166.67% · N 90 / 1————
New York - Federal Plaza
China59.00%10084.26% · N 8,0893 / 3—3 / 947 / 816 / 7
Bangladesh79.49%Small sample3981.73% · N 2,118——7 / 922 / 272 / 3
India36.84%Small sample3866.19% · N 3,830——0 / 213 / 301 / 6
El Salvador30.00%Small sample2062.34% · N 1,086——1 / 24 / 131 / 5
Albania87.50%Small sample1687.47% · N 439———13 / 141 / 2
Nepal62.50%Small sample1681.01% · N 1,143———7 / 133 / 3
Ecuador38.46%Small sample1329.80% · N 1,067——2 / 41 / 62 / 3
Guatemala75.00%Small sample1258.87% · N 586——1 / 18 / 11—
Burkina Faso81.82%Small sample1183.26% · N 227——0 / 16 / 63 / 4
Former Countries (UR)100.00%Small sample1091.98% · N 374——1 / 19 / 9—
Honduras50.00%Small sample1066.96% · N 1,008——1 / 14 / 60 / 3
Indonesia88.89%Small sample965.38% · N 26——2 / 23 / 33 / 4
Pakistan66.67%Small sample979.50% · N 361——1 / 15 / 8—
Nigeria100.00%Small sample885.44% · N 206——6 / 62 / 2—
Sri Lanka71.43%Small sample762.31% · N 130———5 / 60 / 1
Egypt83.33%Small sample684.68% · N 111———5 / 50 / 1
Russia80.00%Small sample586.94% · N 988——2 / 32 / 2—
Turkiye50.00%Small sample469.61% · N 102—0 / 1—2 / 3—
Georgia100.00%Small sample381.98% · N 455————3 / 3
Mali100.00%Small sample378.43% · N 51——3 / 3——
Mexico66.67%Small sample332.50% · N 160———2 / 3—
Ukraine100.00%Small sample395.29% · N 170——1 / 12 / 2—
Venezuela66.67%Small sample348.38% · N 494——1 / 21 / 1—
Belarus100.00%Small sample296.84% · N 95———2 / 2—
Bhutan0.00%Small sample259.09% · N 22———0 / 2—
Gambia50.00%Small sample275.00% · N 32——0 / 11 / 1—
Guinea50.00%Small sample265.41% · N 185————1 / 2
Kosovo50.00%Small sample285.00% · N 160———1 / 2—
Bolivia0.00%Small sample110.00% · N 10————0 / 1
Colombia100.00%Small sample132.83% · N 329———1 / 1—
Former Countries (YO)0.00%Small sample185.71% · N 42———0 / 1—
Italy0.00%Small sample145.45% · N 11———0 / 1—
Ivory Coast (Cote D'Ivoire)100.00%Small sample183.05% · N 59————1 / 1
Jamaica0.00%Small sample162.50% · N 72———0 / 1—
Kazakhstan0.00%Small sample191.96% · N 112———0 / 1—
Kirghizia (Kyrgyzstan)0.00%Small sample171.05% · N 76———0 / 1—
Liberia100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 4———1 / 1—
Macau100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 1———1 / 1—
Mauritania100.00%Small sample132.50% · N 160————1 / 1
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample168.38% · N 117——0 / 1——
Peru100.00%Small sample119.05% · N 126——1 / 1——
Senegal0.00%Small sample135.58% · N 104———0 / 1—
Sierra Leone100.00%Small sample169.23% · N 13———1 / 1—
Turkmenistan100.00%Small sample168.18% · N 22——1 / 1——
Uzbekistan100.00%Small sample167.12% · N 441——1 / 1——
Vietnam0.00%Small sample160.00% · N 20———0 / 1—
Yemen100.00%Small sample180.00% · N 30———1 / 1—
Annandale · WAS
El Salvador26.39%Small sample7238.37% · N 2,6193 / 94 / 4212 / 21——
Honduras25.35%Small sample7137.33% · N 1,6260 / 1115 / 433 / 17——
Peru7.41%Small sample2721.81% · N 2430 / 32 / 200 / 4——
Guatemala39.13%Small sample2330.32% · N 8312 / 42 / 95 / 10——
Nicaragua30.00%Small sample2053.24% · N 2161 / 23 / 162 / 2——
Bolivia16.67%Small sample1827.21% · N 136—1 / 152 / 3——
Venezuela45.45%Small sample1156.45% · N 1860 / 15 / 10———
Mauritania55.56%Small sample954.12% · N 85—5 / 9———
Russia100.00%Small sample889.29% · N 84—8 / 8———
Colombia0.00%Small sample728.24% · N 850 / 10 / 6———
Afghanistan100.00%Small sample593.55% · N 124—5 / 5———
Haiti60.00%Small sample540.00% · N 10—3 / 5———
Brazil0.00%Small sample30.00% · N 14—0 / 3———
Ethiopia100.00%Small sample387.23% · N 235—2 / 21 / 1——
Mexico0.00%Small sample314.02% · N 107—0 / 20 / 1——
Syria33.33%Small sample390.32% · N 31—1 / 10 / 2——
Nepal0.00%Small sample266.67% · N 33—0 / 2———
Panama100.00%Small sample2100.00% · N 2—2 / 2———
Turkiye0.00%Small sample278.10% · N 1050 / 10 / 1———
Vietnam0.00%Small sample225.00% · N 80 / 10 / 1———
Bangladesh0.00%Small sample158.02% · N 81—0 / 1———
Cameroon100.00%Small sample183.95% · N 81—1 / 1———
Chile0.00%Small sample120.00% · N 5—0 / 1———
China0.00%Small sample183.22% · N 149——0 / 1——
Cuba100.00%Small sample150.00% · N 14—1 / 1———
Georgia100.00%Small sample180.00% · N 5—1 / 1———
Ghana0.00%Small sample147.62% · N 21—0 / 1———
Guinea0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 7—0 / 1———
India0.00%Small sample131.25% · N 32—0 / 1———
Iran100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 121 / 1————
Iraq100.00%Small sample193.33% · N 30——1 / 1——
Kirghizia (Kyrgyzstan)100.00%Small sample162.50% · N 8—1 / 1———
Nigeria0.00%Small sample160.00% · N 15—0 / 1———
Philippines0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 2—0 / 1———
Senegal0.00%Small sample125.00% · N 16—0 / 1———
Sudan100.00%Small sample191.11% · N 45——1 / 1——
Turkmenistan0.00%Small sample181.82% · N 11—0 / 1———
United Arab Emirates100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 1——1 / 1——
Unknown Nationality100.00%Small sample150.00% · N 2—1 / 1———
Philadelphia
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample343.18% · N 88——0 / 3——
Boston · BOS
El Salvador100.00%Small sample261.11% · N 1,296————2 / 2
Newark
Turkiye0.00%Small sample256.97% · N 2510 / 2————
Denver
Turkiye0.00%Small sample158.82% · N 34——0 / 1——
Hyattsville
Ethiopia0.00%Small sample181.21% · N 463—0 / 1———
New York - Varick · NYV
Vietnam0.00%Small sample147.62% · N 21———0 / 1—
Otero
Bolivia0.00%Small sample120.00% · N 10—0 / 1———
Sacramento · SMO
Russia100.00%Small sample193.74% · N 1,998—1 / 1———
Sterling · STE
Guatemala0.00%Small sample123.39% · N 7740 / 1————

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Annandale · ANN · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Same count scale for both hearing types. Browse horizontally to see all 36 months.

Proceedings

Master Calendar Hearings

Individual / Merits Hearings

Months with no retained records show 0.

Monthly counts are available for all recorded courts below.

Annandale · ANN

Monthly counts

Lorianne Campanella · LCA · Annandale · ANN · 2026-09–2029-08 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-08 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-0935591231
2026-10679226
2026-11260026
2026-121872520
2027-01161028
2027-02046011
2027-03075034
2027-04070030
2027-05051022
2027-06063031
2027-07053029
2027-08044017
2027-0901904
2027-100000
2027-110000
2027-120000
2028-010000
2028-020000
2028-030000
2028-040000
2028-050000
2028-060000
2028-070000
2028-080000
2028-090000
2028-100000
2028-110000
2028-120000
2029-010000
2029-020000
2029-030000
2029-040000
2029-050000
2029-060000
2029-070000
2029-080000

Retained: 814Excluded: 250Unable to confirm: 4Source files and checks

Boston · BOS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New York - Federal Plaza · NYC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Annandale · WAS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

This judge code has an unresolved identity or name association. Its BIA row is unavailable; this is not a zero count.

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 434 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code LCA at Annandale in FY2021–FY2025, 94 were grants (21.66%) and 340 were denials (78.34%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 12 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

Why is FY2026 marked as a partial year?

Fiscal year 2026 runs from 2025-10-01 to 2026-09-30, and the source data end on 2026-08-31. FY2026 figures cover only part of the year, so they are not compared with complete years.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Where does this judge hear cases now?

EOIR’s official hearing directory, checked 2026-09-16, lists this name at Annandale.

Under this judge code, the 2026-08 EOIR edition records hearing dates from 2026-09 to 2029-08 at Annandale: 62 master and 752 individual proceedings.

A listing or a scheduled date does not establish a sole duty station.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

6,130Associated proceeding records
3,504Proceedings linked to asylum applications
3,155Eligible dated asylum records
1,458Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
25
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY1991
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2026 · Partial year
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 346 eligible asylum records have no completion date.
  • 500 eligible asylum records have no application result; 157 of them appear in the dated list. 343 records lack both a usable completion date and an application result. The missing-date and missing-result counts overlap.
  • 3 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

3,501 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

On the checked official listing

An official listing may include supervisory or multiple-court assignments; it does not establish a sole duty station.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Annandale

Retained: 814Excluded: 250Unable to confirm: 4

Raw Master and Individual records
1,068
Unconfirmed proportion
0.37%
Recorded handling reason
250
Multiple future records without a handling reason
4
Historical schedule records
3,887
Future schedule records
1,068
Other schedule types
121
Reliable asylum association
2,666
No identifiable asylum association
2,289

Boston · BOS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
27
Reliable asylum association
14
No identifiable asylum association
13

New York - Federal Plaza

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
8,552
Other schedule types
13
Reliable asylum association
6,179
No identifiable asylum association
2,373

Pearsall

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
34
Reliable asylum association
6
No identifiable asylum association
28

Annandale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
3,916
Other schedule types
1
Reliable asylum association
2,504
No identifiable asylum association
1,412
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: LCA · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY1991–FY2026 · Partial year: FY2026

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Judge Lorianne Campanella · Annandale Immigration Court asylum records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/lorianne-campanella-lca Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge