AsylumCompass
Saved
English

This historical identity has not been confirmed. Records cannot be attributed to this person.

From FY2021 to FY2025, 112 of 324 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code SME at Dallas were grants (34.57%) and 212 were denials (65.43%). In the same years, the court recorded 19.11% and the national figure was 37.33%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Dallas · DAL

Grants 112 · Denials 212 · N 324
95% interval: 29.60%–39.90%

Judge code SME
34.57%N 324
Dallas
19.11%N 5,291
United States · all courts
37.33%N 367,995

Among comparable judge codes at this court

22 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2021–FY2025. Their recorded grant shares range from 2.84% to 46.75%; the median is 19.46%.
FY2026 so far
0.00%33 records through 2026-08-31 · court: 2.53%
Record coverage
20 courts with recordsFY1995–FY2026 · 37 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · not on the official listing checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Dallas

0%25%50%75%100%FY2017FY2018FY2019FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY20260.00%100.00%59.52%42.86%43.90%16.30%0.00%15.18%17.55%18.95%13.32%32.03%30.28%27.40%26.60%10.88%2.53%37.13%46.12%47.28%43.52%23.13%
  • Judge code SME
  • Dallas
  • United States · all courts
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Dallas · DALExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year0.00%Small sample330330.00%–10.43%
FY202516.30%1352211311.02%–23.44%
FY202443.90%Small sample82364633.67%–54.68%
FY202342.86%Small sample63273631.40%–55.14%
FY202259.52%Small sample42251744.49%–72.96%
FY2021100.00%Small sample22034.24%–100.00%
FY20200.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY19950.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
El Paso SPC · EPDExplore this court's full context
FY202344.44%Small sample94518.88%–73.33%
FY202260.00%Small sample53223.07%–88.24%
Los Fresnos · PISExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY202233.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%
FY202033.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%
Conroe · CICExplore this court's full context
FY20220.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY201916.67%Small sample122104.70%–44.80%
Buffalo · BUFExplore this court's full context
FY20220.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY201966.67%Small sample96335.42%–87.94%
Chicago · CHIExplore this court's full context
FY20210.00%Small sample8080.00%–32.44%
FY20202.56%Small sample782760.71%–8.88%
FY201916.25%Small sample8013679.75%–25.84%
Harlingen · HLGExplore this court's full context
FY202180.00%Small sample2016458.40%–91.93%
FY20209.68%Small sample939845.18%–17.38%
Houston - Jefferson Street Immigration Court · HOUExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample4040.00%–48.99%
FY20190.00%Small sample170170.00%–18.43%
Aurora · AURExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY2019100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
Elizabeth · ELZExplore this court's full context
FY2020100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
Baltimore · BALExplore this court's full context
FY201943.48%Small sample23101325.63%–63.19%
Phoenix · PHOExplore this court's full context
FY201920.00%Small sample5143.62%–62.45%
Omaha · OMAExplore this court's full context
FY201950.00%Small sample42215.00%–85.00%
Tacoma · TACExplore this court's full context
FY201950.00%Small sample42215.00%–85.00%
Florence · FLOExplore this court's full context
FY201950.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%
LaSalle · JNAExplore this court's full context
FY20190.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Oakdale · OAKExplore this court's full context
FY201950.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%
Adelanto · ADLExplore this court's full context
FY20190.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Eloy · ELOExplore this court's full context
FY2019100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
Fort Snelling · BLMExplore this court's full context
FY2019100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationalityFY2021–FY2025 · pooledTotal (N)Court · same nationalityFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Dallas
El Salvador15.79%Small sample765.57% · N 9340 / 254 / 216 / 232 / 7—
Venezuela45.45%Small sample4428.51% · N 8701 / 214 / 68 / 107 / 7—
Honduras19.05%Small sample425.55% · N 8831 / 204 / 81 / 102 / 4—
Nigeria100.00%Small sample3066.17% · N 13310 / 1010 / 107 / 73 / 3—
Mexico0.00%Small sample231.27% · N 6280 / 130 / 50 / 10 / 4—
Guatemala5.00%Small sample205.58% · N 4300 / 100 / 60 / 11 / 3—
Colombia42.86%Small sample75.95% · N 1850 / 33 / 4———
Cameroon83.33%Small sample652.31% · N 651 / 24 / 4———
Egypt100.00%Small sample664.47% · N 761 / 1——5 / 5—
Syria16.67%Small sample661.54% · N 130 / 5——1 / 1—
Nicaragua20.00%Small sample516.67% · N 1560 / 1—1 / 4——
Cuba75.00%Small sample431.58% · N 1140 / 12 / 21 / 1——
Eritrea75.00%Small sample474.29% · N 352 / 2—1 / 10 / 1—
Ethiopia100.00%Small sample475.00% · N 161 / 11 / 1—1 / 11 / 1
Romania0.00%Small sample45.00% · N 400 / 20 / 2———
Armenia0.00%Small sample30.00% · N 3—0 / 3———
Iran33.33%Small sample369.23% · N 131 / 3————
Peru0.00%Small sample30.00% · N 430 / 3————
Vietnam100.00%Small sample365.22% · N 233 / 3————
Afghanistan100.00%Small sample277.42% · N 621 / 11 / 1———
Congo0.00%Small sample241.67% · N 120 / 2————
Gabon0.00%Small sample20.00% · N 20 / 1——0 / 1—
Kenya0.00%Small sample218.18% · N 110 / 1——0 / 1—
Nepal0.00%Small sample235.29% · N 170 / 1—0 / 1——
Niger0.00%Small sample225.00% · N 4—0 / 2———
Russia50.00%Small sample279.49% · N 390 / 1—1 / 1——
Turkiye100.00%Small sample277.78% · N 81—1 / 11 / 1——
Uganda100.00%Small sample275.00% · N 4—2 / 2———
Brazil0.00%Small sample116.67% · N 6———0 / 1—
China100.00%Small sample151.22% · N 41————1 / 1
Guinea0.00%Small sample166.67% · N 3—0 / 1———
India0.00%Small sample120.45% · N 44—0 / 1———
Indonesia100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 1———1 / 1—
Lesotho0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 10 / 1————
Pakistan0.00%Small sample129.41% · N 17——0 / 1——
Rwanda100.00%Small sample160.00% · N 5———1 / 1—
Senegal0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 8——0 / 1——
Sri Lanka0.00%Small sample144.44% · N 9—0 / 1———
Stateless - Alien Unable To Name A Country0.00%Small sample150.00% · N 140 / 1————
Yemen100.00%Small sample166.67% · N 3———1 / 1—
Zimbabwe0.00%Small sample142.86% · N 21—0 / 1———
Harlingen
Honduras66.67%Small sample920.11% · N 174————6 / 9
Cuba100.00%Small sample637.98% · N 129————6 / 6
Venezuela100.00%Small sample357.86% · N 159————3 / 3
Ecuador100.00%Small sample118.75% · N 16————1 / 1
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample124.18% · N 426————0 / 1
El Paso SPC
Nicaragua40.00%Small sample521.05% · N 76——0 / 22 / 3—
Colombia33.33%Small sample37.87% · N 89——1 / 3——
Turkiye100.00%Small sample233.33% · N 24——2 / 2——
Chile0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 2———0 / 1—
Honduras100.00%Small sample13.54% · N 113———1 / 1—
Nigeria0.00%Small sample111.11% · N 9——0 / 1——
Venezuela100.00%Small sample114.29% · N 154——1 / 1——
Chicago
El Salvador0.00%Small sample338.74% · N 462————0 / 3
Honduras0.00%Small sample340.13% · N 912————0 / 3
Mexico0.00%Small sample231.05% · N 1,050————0 / 2
Los Fresnos · PIS
Mexico0.00%Small sample20.00% · N 211——0 / 2——
Ghana0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 3———0 / 1—
Guatemala0.00%Small sample13.03% · N 66——0 / 1——
Romania0.00%Small sample112.50% · N 8———0 / 1—
Turkiye100.00%Small sample150.00% · N 2———1 / 1—
Buffalo
Venezuela0.00%Small sample133.13% · N 160———0 / 1—
Conroe
Colombia0.00%Small sample11.68% · N 179———0 / 1—

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Dallas · DAL · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

All Master and Individual schedule records in this view were excluded by the counting rules. See the coverage details.

Monthly counts are available for all recorded courts below.

Adelanto · ADL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Atlanta - W. Peachtree Street · ATL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Aurora · AUR

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Baltimore · BAL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Fort Snelling · BLM

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Buffalo · BUF

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Chicago · CHI

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Conroe · CIC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dallas · DAL

Monthly counts

Sarah M. Ellison · SME · Dallas · DAL · 2026-09–2029-08 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-08 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-090000
2026-100000
2026-110000
2026-120000
2027-010000
2027-020000
2027-030000
2027-040000
2027-050000
2027-060000
2027-070000
2027-080000
2027-090000
2027-100000
2027-110000
2027-120000
2028-010000
2028-020000
2028-030000
2028-040000
2028-050000
2028-060000
2028-070000
2028-080000
2028-090000
2028-100000
2028-110000
2028-120000
2029-010000
2029-020000
2029-030000
2029-040000
2029-050000
2029-060000
2029-070000
2029-080000

Retained: 0Excluded: 5,089Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Denver · DEN

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Eloy · ELO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Elizabeth · ELZ

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

El Paso SPC · EPD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Florence · FLO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Houston – Greenspoint Park · HGP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Harlingen · HLG

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Houston - Jefferson Street Immigration Court · HOU

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Houston – S. Gessner Road · HSG

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

LaSalle · JNA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Memphis · MEM

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New Orleans · NOL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Oakdale · OAK

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Omaha · OMA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Phoenix · PHO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Stewart · SDC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Seattle · SEA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Salt Lake City · SLC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

San Diego · SND

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Tacoma · TAC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

Denominator: respondent-filed BIA IJ Case Appeal events with an exact proceeding link and stored judge code, with a recorded disposition during the displayed period.

Respondent-filed recorded BIA appeal events during FY2021–FY2025
Appeal events (denominator)DIS · recorded dismissal/affirmanceREM · remand as recordedSUS · appeal sustained as recordedOther · mixed recorded dispositions
1651009056

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 324 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code SME at Dallas in FY2021–FY2025, 112 were grants (34.57%) and 212 were denials (65.43%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 20 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

Why is FY2026 marked as a partial year?

Fiscal year 2026 runs from 2025-10-01 to 2026-09-30, and the source data end on 2026-08-31. FY2026 figures cover only part of the year, so they are not compared with complete years.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

12,749Associated proceeding records
3,068Proceedings linked to asylum applications
3,067Eligible dated asylum records
755Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
25
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY1992
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2026 · Partial year
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 547 eligible asylum records have no application result; 547 of them appear in the dated list.
  • 1 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

3,067 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

Not on the checked official listing

The checked listing does not establish why this name is absent or where this person works now.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Adelanto · ADL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
19
Other schedule types
17
Reliable asylum association
2
No identifiable asylum association
17

Atlanta - W. Peachtree Street

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
24
Reliable asylum association
13
No identifiable asylum association
11

Aurora

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
110
Other schedule types
74
Reliable asylum association
9
No identifiable asylum association
101

Baltimore

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
149
Other schedule types
1
Reliable asylum association
130
No identifiable asylum association
19

Fort Snelling

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
7
Reliable asylum association
7

Buffalo

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
32
Other schedule types
1
Reliable asylum association
18
No identifiable asylum association
14

Chicago

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
475
Reliable asylum association
473
No identifiable asylum association
2

Conroe

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
416
Other schedule types
367
Reliable asylum association
34
No identifiable asylum association
382

Dallas

Retained: 0Excluded: 5,089Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
5,089
Unconfirmed proportion
0.00%
Recorded handling reason
5,089
Historical schedule records
31,772
Future schedule records
5,089
Other schedule types
198
Reliable asylum association
14,186
No identifiable asylum association
22,675

Denver

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
24
Reliable asylum association
5
No identifiable asylum association
19

Eloy

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
8
Other schedule types
3
Reliable asylum association
5
No identifiable asylum association
3

Elizabeth

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
4
Reliable asylum association
2
No identifiable asylum association
2

El Paso SPC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
202
Other schedule types
57
Reliable asylum association
86
No identifiable asylum association
116

Florence

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
100
Other schedule types
3
Reliable asylum association
48
No identifiable asylum association
52

Houston – Greenspoint Park

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
2
Reliable asylum association
2

Harlingen

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,119
Other schedule types
7
Reliable asylum association
1,031
No identifiable asylum association
88

Houston - Jefferson Street Immigration Court

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
71
Reliable asylum association
63
No identifiable asylum association
7
Unlinked asylum records
1

Houston – S. Gessner Road

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1
Reliable asylum association
1

LaSalle

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
2
Reliable asylum association
2

Memphis · MEM

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1
Reliable asylum association
1

New Orleans · NOL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
102
Reliable asylum association
44
No identifiable asylum association
58

Oakdale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
7
Reliable asylum association
7

Omaha

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
17
Reliable asylum association
12
No identifiable asylum association
5

Phoenix

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
29
Reliable asylum association
18
No identifiable asylum association
11

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
238
Other schedule types
88
Reliable asylum association
45
No identifiable asylum association
193

Pearsall

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
88
Other schedule types
88
No identifiable asylum association
88

Stewart

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1
Other schedule types
1
No identifiable asylum association
1

Seattle

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
18
Reliable asylum association
18

Salt Lake City

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
15
Reliable asylum association
14
No identifiable asylum association
1

San Diego

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
2
Reliable asylum association
1
No identifiable asylum association
1

Tacoma

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
103
Other schedule types
34
Reliable asylum association
35
No identifiable asylum association
68
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: SME · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY1992–FY2026 · Partial year: FY2026

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Sarah M. Ellison: historical immigration judge code records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/sarah-m-ellison-sme Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge