AsylumCompass
Saved
English

This historical identity has not been confirmed. Records cannot be attributed to this person.

In FY2026 through 2026-08-31 (a partial year), 0 of 1 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code SSL at Baltimore were grants (0.00%) and 1 were denials (100.00%). In the same period, the court recorded 6.52%. EOIR data through 2026-08-31; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Baltimore · BAL

Grants 0 · Denials 1 · N 1
95% interval: 0.00%–79.35%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

Judge code SSL
0.00%N 1
Baltimore
6.52%N 2,422
United States · all courts
No national figure is published for this period

Among comparable judge codes at this court

This figure has fewer than 100 grant-or-denial records, so it is not placed among comparable judge codes.

Record coverage
18 courts with recordsFY2020–FY2026 · 35 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Data through
2026-08-31EOIR records · not on the official listing checked 2026-09-16Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Baltimore

0%25%50%75%100%FY2020FY2021FY2022FY2023FY2024FY2025FY20260.00%100.00%0.00%33.08%47.00%66.49%75.33%59.17%24.21%6.52%37.13%46.12%47.28%43.52%23.13%
  • Judge code SSL
  • Baltimore
  • United States · all courts
National figures are published for FY2021–FY2025. A broken ring marks a value from fewer than 100 records.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Baltimore · BALExplore this court's full context
FY2026Partial year0.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY2022100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
FY20200.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Los Fresnos · PEPExplore this court's full context
FY202512.00%Small sample759666.44%–21.26%
Pearsall · PSDExplore this court's full context
FY20250.00%Small sample370370.00%–9.41%
FY20240.00%Small sample4040.00%–48.99%
FY202020.00%Small sample5143.62%–62.45%
Oakdale · OAKExplore this court's full context
FY202412.07%Small sample587515.97%–22.88%
FY202319.64%112229013.34%–27.95%
FY202227.54%Small sample69195018.39%–39.05%
FY20200.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Dallas · DALExplore this court's full context
FY2024100.00%Small sample22034.24%–100.00%
FY20210.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
FY20200.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Boston · BOSExplore this court's full context
FY20230.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY202213.51%Small sample375325.91%–27.98%
Harlingen · HLGExplore this court's full context
FY20220.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
FY202144.44%Small sample1881024.56%–66.28%
FY202013.73%153211329.16%–20.07%
Conroe · CICExplore this court's full context
FY2022100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
FY202171.43%Small sample75235.89%–91.78%
FY202017.24%Small sample295247.60%–34.55%
Salt Lake City · SLCExplore this court's full context
FY20220.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY202145.83%Small sample24111327.89%–64.93%
El Paso · ELPExplore this court's full context
FY20220.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
LaSalle · JNAExplore this court's full context
FY20210.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY202022.22%Small sample9276.32%–54.74%
Los Fresnos · PISExplore this court's full context
FY20210.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY202020.00%Small sample5143.62%–62.45%
New Orleans · NOLExplore this court's full context
FY20210.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
El Paso SPC · EPDExplore this court's full context
FY202150.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%
Houston - Jefferson Street Immigration Court · HOUExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample9090.00%–29.91%
Florence · FLOExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Elizabeth · ELZExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Tacoma · TACExplore this court's full context
FY20200.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups count grant and denial proceedings in FY2021–FY2025, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2021–FY2025 and each fiscal year
Recorded nationalityFY2021–FY2025 · pooledTotal (N)Court · same nationalityFY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Oakdale
Nicaragua17.39%Small sample4617.12% · N 257—0 / 10 / 108 / 35—
Turkiye33.33%Small sample3928.77% · N 219——9 / 294 / 10—
Colombia6.67%Small sample151.10% · N 181—0 / 61 / 40 / 5—
Honduras0.00%Small sample141.63% · N 123—0 / 30 / 11——
Ecuador0.00%Small sample101.82% · N 110—0 / 80 / 2——
Mexico0.00%Small sample101.32% · N 151—0 / 40 / 6——
El Salvador22.22%Small sample95.26% · N 76—1 / 31 / 50 / 1—
Russia50.00%Small sample837.87% · N 367—3 / 31 / 40 / 1—
Uzbekistan0.00%Small sample84.48% · N 134—0 / 70 / 1——
Guatemala0.00%Small sample73.26% · N 92—0 / 40 / 3——
Georgia33.33%Small sample65.88% · N 170—1 / 5—1 / 1—
India16.67%Small sample62.96% · N 135—0 / 11 / 40 / 1—
Eritrea20.00%Small sample515.91% · N 44——1 / 5——
Peru0.00%Small sample52.38% · N 42——0 / 30 / 2—
Venezuela0.00%Small sample522.92% · N 144—0 / 40 / 1——
Armenia66.67%Small sample316.67% · N 42——1 / 11 / 2—
China33.33%Small sample34.44% · N 90——1 / 3——
Dominican Republic0.00%Small sample30.00% · N 25——0 / 20 / 1—
Somalia0.00%Small sample318.75% · N 32——0 / 3——
Afghanistan100.00%Small sample234.48% · N 58—1 / 11 / 1——
Angola0.00%Small sample20.00% · N 8——0 / 2——
Belize0.00%Small sample25.88% · N 17——0 / 10 / 1—
Cameroon100.00%Small sample237.89% · N 95—1 / 1—1 / 1—
Cuba50.00%Small sample230.48% · N 105—0 / 11 / 1——
Egypt50.00%Small sample213.95% · N 43——1 / 10 / 1—
Guinea0.00%Small sample218.18% · N 11—0 / 2———
Haiti50.00%Small sample26.90% · N 29——0 / 11 / 1—
Jamaica50.00%Small sample22.78% · N 36——1 / 2——
Senegal0.00%Small sample25.77% · N 52—0 / 2———
Azerbaijan100.00%Small sample125.00% · N 8———1 / 1—
Belarus100.00%Small sample150.00% · N 6———1 / 1—
Bolivia0.00%Small sample125.00% · N 16—0 / 1———
Brazil0.00%Small sample18.11% · N 37—0 / 1———
Canada0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1———0 / 1—
Chile0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 3——0 / 1——
Ethiopia100.00%Small sample113.79% · N 29——1 / 1——
Israel100.00%Small sample1100.00% · N 1———1 / 1—
Kenya100.00%Small sample112.50% · N 8——1 / 1——
Kirghizia (Kyrgyzstan)0.00%Small sample14.00% · N 25———0 / 1—
Moldavia (Moldova)0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 6———0 / 1—
Panama0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 4——0 / 1——
Togo0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 6——0 / 1——
Zimbabwe0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1——0 / 1——
Los Fresnos · PEP
Colombia0.00%Small sample110.00% · N 450 / 11————
Honduras0.00%Small sample90.00% · N 460 / 9————
Afghanistan71.43%Small sample724.44% · N 455 / 7————
Mexico0.00%Small sample66.25% · N 800 / 6————
Venezuela0.00%Small sample64.76% · N 420 / 6————
Russia60.00%Small sample544.07% · N 593 / 5————
Dominican Republic0.00%Small sample40.00% · N 170 / 4————
Georgia33.33%Small sample327.27% · N 111 / 3————
Iran0.00%Small sample319.51% · N 410 / 3————
Democratic Republic Of Congo0.00%Small sample20.00% · N 110 / 2————
El Salvador0.00%Small sample20.00% · N 400 / 2————
Ethiopia0.00%Small sample20.00% · N 40 / 2————
Guatemala0.00%Small sample211.76% · N 170 / 2————
Togo0.00%Small sample20.00% · N 120 / 2————
Angola0.00%Small sample15.00% · N 200 / 1————
Cameroon0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 140 / 1————
Cuba0.00%Small sample111.11% · N 360 / 1————
Ecuador0.00%Small sample110.00% · N 100 / 1————
Guinea0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 40 / 1————
India0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 110 / 1————
Jamaica0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 10 / 1————
Kirghizia (Kyrgyzstan)0.00%Small sample17.69% · N 130 / 1————
Panama0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 10 / 1————
Somalia0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 20 / 1————
Trinidad And Tobago0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 10 / 1————
Pearsall
Honduras0.00%Small sample80.92% · N 3270 / 60 / 2———
Mexico0.00%Small sample70.00% · N 1590 / 60 / 1———
Ecuador0.00%Small sample44.26% · N 470 / 4————
Colombia0.00%Small sample34.27% · N 1170 / 3————
Venezuela0.00%Small sample315.03% · N 1530 / 3————
Cuba0.00%Small sample228.37% · N 1410 / 2————
El Salvador0.00%Small sample21.39% · N 1440 / 2————
Guatemala0.00%Small sample21.16% · N 860 / 2————
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample215.04% · N 1130 / 10 / 1———
Azerbaijan0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 20 / 1————
Brazil0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 70 / 1————
Cameroon0.00%Small sample152.63% · N 380 / 1————
Dominican Republic0.00%Small sample110.00% · N 200 / 1————
Haiti0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 170 / 1————
Iran0.00%Small sample117.39% · N 460 / 1————
Romania0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 20 / 1————
Uzbekistan0.00%Small sample122.22% · N 90 / 1————
Boston · BOS
Guatemala0.00%Small sample855.08% · N 1,643———0 / 8—
El Salvador66.67%Small sample661.11% · N 1,296———4 / 6—
Haiti0.00%Small sample559.72% · N 144——0 / 10 / 4—
Brazil0.00%Small sample429.17% · N 5,653———0 / 4—
Dominican Republic0.00%Small sample439.67% · N 121———0 / 4—
Honduras0.00%Small sample258.42% · N 695———0 / 2—
Venezuela50.00%Small sample271.60% · N 81———1 / 2—
Cape Verde0.00%Small sample116.67% · N 6———0 / 1—
Ecuador0.00%Small sample155.73% · N 811———0 / 1—
Jamaica0.00%Small sample110.53% · N 19———0 / 1—
Nationality not recorded0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1———0 / 1—
Nigeria0.00%Small sample175.00% · N 28———0 / 1—
Turkiye0.00%Small sample179.03% · N 62———0 / 1—
Uganda0.00%Small sample186.79% · N 106———0 / 1—
Salt Lake City
Venezuela80.00%Small sample1086.02% · N 3,397————8 / 10
Mexico0.00%Small sample73.81% · N 420————0 / 7
Guatemala66.67%Small sample35.22% · N 134————2 / 3
El Salvador0.00%Small sample15.10% · N 98————0 / 1
Honduras0.00%Small sample110.40% · N 125————0 / 1
Moldavia (Moldova)0.00%Small sample166.67% · N 3———0 / 1—
Pakistan0.00%Small sample172.73% · N 11————0 / 1
Peru100.00%Small sample18.09% · N 235————1 / 1
Harlingen
Honduras0.00%Small sample720.11% · N 174————0 / 7
Cuba100.00%Small sample537.98% · N 129————5 / 5
El Salvador0.00%Small sample322.89% · N 83————0 / 3
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample324.18% · N 426———0 / 3—
Venezuela100.00%Small sample357.86% · N 159————3 / 3
Conroe
Afghanistan100.00%Small sample121.43% · N 14———1 / 1—
Cameroon100.00%Small sample133.33% · N 30————1 / 1
Cuba100.00%Small sample124.60% · N 126————1 / 1
El Salvador0.00%Small sample10.51% · N 195————0 / 1
Eritrea100.00%Small sample122.22% · N 9————1 / 1
Honduras0.00%Small sample10.63% · N 318————0 / 1
Kenya100.00%Small sample150.00% · N 4————1 / 1
Senegal100.00%Small sample16.56% · N 61————1 / 1
Dallas
Venezuela100.00%Small sample228.51% · N 870—2 / 2———
Burma (Myanmar)0.00%Small sample120.00% · N 5————0 / 1
India0.00%Small sample120.45% · N 44————0 / 1
New Orleans · NOL
Guatemala0.00%Small sample35.93% · N 540————0 / 3
El Paso
Cuba0.00%Small sample125.00% · N 396———0 / 1—
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample131.40% · N 207———0 / 1—
El Paso SPC
Iran100.00%Small sample144.83% · N 29————1 / 1
Mexico0.00%Small sample10.63% · N 158————0 / 1
Baltimore
El Salvador100.00%Small sample146.97% · N 1,944———1 / 1—
LaSalle
Honduras0.00%Small sample14.81% · N 187————0 / 1
Los Fresnos · PIS
Colombia0.00%Small sample13.17% · N 63————0 / 1

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no grant or denial record that year.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-08-nationality-complete-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Aurora · AUR · All proceedings · 2026-09–2029-08

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-09–2029-08 (36 months)

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Aurora · AUR

Historical schedule records exist, but no future hearing date is recorded for this selection in this edition.

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Baltimore · BAL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Boston · BOS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Conroe · CIC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dallas · DAL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Denver · DEN

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Eloy · ELO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

El Paso · ELP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Elizabeth · ELZ

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

El Paso SPC · EPD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Florence · FLO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Harlingen · HLG

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Houston - Jefferson Street Immigration Court · HOU

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

LaSalle · JNA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Laredo · LRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New Orleans · NOL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New York - Varick · NYV

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Oakdale · OAK

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Otay Mesa · OTM

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Otero · OTO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PEP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Salt Lake City · SLC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

San Diego · SND

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Tacoma · TAC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Tucson · TUC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · eoir-2026-08-judge-records-v2 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-08 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Historical decision FY2021–FY2025 pooled · respondent-filed appeals (A)

Denominator: respondent-filed BIA IJ Case Appeal events with an exact proceeding link and stored judge code, with a recorded disposition during the displayed period.

Respondent-filed recorded BIA appeal events during FY2021–FY2025
Appeal events (denominator)DIS · recorded dismissal/affirmanceREM · remand as recordedSUS · appeal sustained as recordedOther · mixed recorded dispositions
1769828050

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 1 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code SSL at Baltimore in FY2026, 0 were grants (0.00%) and 1 were denials (100.00%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 18 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

Why is FY2026 marked as a partial year?

Fiscal year 2026 runs from 2025-10-01 to 2026-09-30, and the source data end on 2026-08-31. FY2026 figures cover only part of the year, so they are not compared with complete years.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-08-judge-source-coverage-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

4,100Associated proceeding records
1,062Proceedings linked to asylum applications
1,061Eligible dated asylum records
680Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
20
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY2020
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2026 · Partial year
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 54 eligible asylum records have no application result; 54 of them appear in the dated list.
  • 1 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-08-31 · FY2026 is incomplete. Earlier stored dates may predate a judge’s appointment because assignment and saved completion date describe different events.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

1,061 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

Not on the checked official listing

The checked listing does not establish why this name is absent or where this person works now.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-08 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-08-31. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-08-31

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Aurora

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
38
Other schedule types
36
No identifiable asylum association
38

Baltimore

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
2
Reliable asylum association
2

Boston · BOS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,045
Other schedule types
213
Reliable asylum association
419
No identifiable asylum association
626

Conroe

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
476
Other schedule types
230
Reliable asylum association
118
No identifiable asylum association
358

Dallas

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
103
Other schedule types
8
Reliable asylum association
69
No identifiable asylum association
34

Denver

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
48
Reliable asylum association
24
No identifiable asylum association
24

Eloy

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
4
Other schedule types
1
Reliable asylum association
3
No identifiable asylum association
1

El Paso

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
145
Other schedule types
136
Reliable asylum association
8
No identifiable asylum association
137

Elizabeth

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
5
Reliable asylum association
2
No identifiable asylum association
3

El Paso SPC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
122
Other schedule types
70
Reliable asylum association
8
No identifiable asylum association
114

Florence

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
5
Reliable asylum association
2
No identifiable asylum association
3

Harlingen

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,207
Reliable asylum association
1,167
No identifiable asylum association
40

Houston - Jefferson Street Immigration Court

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
11
Reliable asylum association
11

LaSalle

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
147
Other schedule types
108
Reliable asylum association
24
No identifiable asylum association
123

Laredo

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
379
Other schedule types
379
No identifiable asylum association
379

New Orleans · NOL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
301
Other schedule types
5
Reliable asylum association
139
No identifiable asylum association
162

New York - Varick

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1
Reliable asylum association
1

Oakdale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
3,974
Other schedule types
677
Reliable asylum association
2,047
No identifiable asylum association
1,927

Otay Mesa

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
37
Other schedule types
37
No identifiable asylum association
37

Otero

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
8
Other schedule types
8
No identifiable asylum association
8

Los Fresnos · PEP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
798
Other schedule types
114
Reliable asylum association
282
No identifiable asylum association
516

Los Fresnos · PIS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
259
Other schedule types
206
Reliable asylum association
19
No identifiable asylum association
240

Pearsall

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,238
Other schedule types
841
Reliable asylum association
101
No identifiable asylum association
1,137

Salt Lake City

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
96
Reliable asylum association
81
No identifiable asylum association
15

San Diego

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1
Reliable asylum association
1

Tacoma

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
51
Other schedule types
15
Reliable asylum association
18
No identifiable asylum association
33

Tucson

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1
Reliable asylum association
1
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These are historical pooled counts, not a judge score or a current pattern. This product has no annual judge-code breakdown. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These FY2021–FY2025 counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 119,252 · Linked to a stored judge code: 119,155.

Respondent-filed source events: 109,995 · Linked to a stored judge code: 109,915 · Published respondent-filed events: 67,156 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 42,759.

Judge code: SSL · Stored source field: B_TblProceeding.IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: tblAppeal.datBIADecision · Historical period: 2020-10-01–2025-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-08-31.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY2020–FY2026 · Partial year: FY2026

Source edition2026-08

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Standard comparison periodFY2021–FY2025

Source obtained or reviewed for this edition

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Shelly W. Schools: historical immigration judge code records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/shelly-w-schools-ssl Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge