AsylumCompass
Saved
English

In FY2026, 18 of 233 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code GJW at Charlotte were grants (7.73%) and 215 were denials (92.27%). That year, the court recorded 4.27% and the national figure was 6.66%. EOIR data through 2026-09-30; past records do not predict an individual case.

Recorded grant share · Charlotte · CHL

Grants 18 · Denials 215 · N 233
95% interval: 4.94%–11.88%

Records are counted at the court stored on each proceeding. The official listing names Falls Church Immigration Adjudication Center.

Judge code GJW
7.73%N 233
Charlotte
4.27%N 4,984
United States · all courts
6.66%N 158,532

Among comparable judge codes at this court

20 judge codes at this court have 100 or more grant-or-denial records in FY2026. Their recorded grant shares range from 0.00% to 31.50%; the median is 2.40%.
Record coverage
20 courts with recordsFY2015–FY2026 · 43 court-years · Courts are not pooled
Hearing dates on calendar
0 master · 77 individualSterling · STE · proceedings with hearing dates, 2026-10–2029-09Hearing schedule
Data through
2026-09-30EOIR records · official listing: Falls Church Immigration Adjudication Center, checked 2026-10-24Data and sources

Historical outcomes by court

Each row is a fiscal year at the court stored on the dated record. Courts are not pooled; an official listing never moves old results to a new court. Small groups remain visible and are labeled.

Judge figures group saved asylum outcomes by the judge code on each EOIR proceeding. The code identifies the assigned judge; these records do not verify who personally made every application decision. How judge figures work

Recorded grant share by fiscal year at Charlotte

0%10%20%30%40%50%FY2025FY20268.07%7.73%7.03%4.27%22.99%6.66%
  • Judge code GJW
  • Charlotte
  • United States · all courts
National and judge-code figures use recorded fiscal years in this source; missing values remain unavailable.
Recorded grant and denial outcomes · EOIR dated records
Completion FYRecorded grant shareTotal (N)Grant recordsDenial records95% interval
Charlotte · CHLExplore this court's full context
FY20267.73%233182154.94%–11.88%
FY20258.07%161131484.78%–13.32%
FY2020Not calculable000Not calculable
FY2017Not calculable000Not calculable
Sterling · STEExplore this court's full context
FY202612.50%Small sample8172.24%–47.09%
FY20256.25%Small sample322301.73%–20.15%
FY202448.89%Small sample45222334.96%–63.00%
FY20230.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Stewart · SDCExplore this court's full context
FY20260.00%Small sample4040.00%–48.99%
FY2025Not calculable000Not calculable
FY202233.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%
FY20215.56%Small sample181170.99%–25.76%
FY201923.08%Small sample2662011.03%–42.05%
FY201833.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%
Oakdale · OAKExplore this court's full context
FY20260.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY202518.18%Small sample11295.14%–47.70%
FY202237.50%Small sample83513.68%–69.43%
FY20210.00%Small sample606<0.01%–39.03%
FY202050.00%Small sample2119.45%–90.55%
Los Fresnos · PEPExplore this court's full context
FY20260.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20258.70%Small sample232212.42%–26.80%
LaSalle · JNAExplore this court's full context
FY20260.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY202520.00%Small sample153127.05%–45.19%
Annandale · ANNExplore this court's full context
FY2026Not calculable000Not calculable
FY20250.00%Small sample200200.00%–16.11%
San Francisco · SFRExplore this court's full context
FY20250.00%Small sample606<0.01%–39.03%
Pearsall · PSDExplore this court's full context
FY20250.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
Conroe · CICExplore this court's full context
FY20250.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Annandale · WASExplore this court's full context
FY2025Not calculable000Not calculable
FY202412.50%Small sample243214.34%–31.00%
FY202360.00%Small sample30181242.32%–75.41%
FY202270.00%Small sample3021952.12%–83.34%
FY20210.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY2019Not calculable000Not calculable
FY2018100.00%Small sample44051.01%–100.00%
FY2016Not calculable000Not calculable
New York - Varick · NYVExplore this court's full context
FY20240.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY2023Not calculable000Not calculable
Boston · BOSExplore this court's full context
FY202233.33%Small sample3126.15%–79.23%
FY20210.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20190.00%Small sample707<0.01%–35.43%
Buffalo · BUFExplore this court's full context
FY2025Not calculable000Not calculable
FY2022100.00%Small sample11020.65%–100.00%
Fort Snelling · BLMExplore this court's full context
FY202183.33%Small sample65143.65%–96.99%
FY202020.93%1292710214.80%–28.74%
FY20197.69%Small sample524483.03%–18.17%
Elizabeth · ELZExplore this court's full context
FY20210.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
FY20200.00%Small sample303<0.01%–56.15%
Philadelphia · PHIExplore this court's full context
FY20210.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Orlando · ORLExplore this court's full context
FY20180.00%Small sample2020.00%–65.76%
Miami · KROExplore this court's full context
FY20180.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%
Atlanta - W. Peachtree Street · ATLExplore this court's full context
FY2017Not calculable000Not calculable
FY20150.00%Small sample1010.00%–79.35%

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely.

These records do not predict an individual result or measure judge quality. A person may have more than one proceeding.

Source cutoff: 2026-09-30 · eoir-2026-09-case-v1 · Source files and checks · Attribution details

Historical grant and denial records by nationality

Nationality groups show FY2026 first and retain historical counts. These are proceeding records, not people.

The dated results have a different coverage period and do not contain individual nationality. Small groups can change sharply.

Recorded judge × court × nationality · FY2026 and historical fiscal years
Recorded nationalityRecorded grant share · FY2026Total (N)Court · same nationalityFY2026FY2025FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021
Charlotte
Honduras0.00%Small sample440.21% · N 9710 / 441 / 45————
Venezuela0.00%Small sample426.90% · N 6380 / 424 / 12————
Mexico10.53%Small sample381.51% · N 9254 / 385 / 27————
Colombia3.45%Small sample292.35% · N 4691 / 290 / 15————
Brazil0.00%Small sample260.32% · N 3110 / 260 / 22————
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample135.15% · N 2330 / 130 / 7————
Peru0.00%Small sample70.00% · N 600 / 70 / 6————
Haiti0.00%Small sample73.21% · N 1560 / 70 / 2————
Russia100.00%Small sample748.25% · N 1437 / 71 / 2————
Nigeria83.33%Small sample638.89% · N 185 / 6—————
Cuba0.00%Small sample41.20% · N 830 / 40 / 2————
Guatemala0.00%Small sample30.87% · N 3460 / 30 / 5————
Senegal0.00%Small sample23.03% · N 660 / 20 / 3————
Chile0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 210 / 1—————
Ecuador0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 1040 / 1—————
Holland0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 20 / 1—————
Iran0.00%Small sample166.67% · N 90 / 1—————
Jamaica100.00%Small sample110.00% · N 101 / 1—————
El SalvadorNot calculable00.00% · N 2110 / 00 / 5————
IndiaNot calculable00.00% · N 480 / 00 / 3————
CambodiaNot calculable0Not calculable · N 00 / 0—————
MauritaniaNot calculable00.00% · N 40 / 0—————
Moldavia (Moldova)Not calculable00.00% · N 40 / 0—————
MoroccoNot calculable0Not calculable · N 00 / 0—————
BelarusNo stored cell for this period—100.00% · N 2—2 / 2————
EthiopiaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2—0 / 1————
Ivory Coast (Cote D'Ivoire)No stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1—0 / 1————
VietnamNo stored cell for this period—6.67% · N 15—0 / 1————
Democratic Republic Of CongoNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1—0 / 0————
GeorgiaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2—0 / 0————
NepalNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1—0 / 0————
RomaniaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2—0 / 0————
TurkiyeNo stored cell for this period—7.69% · N 13—0 / 0————
Sterling · STE
Mexico0.00%Small sample23.77% · N 4240 / 20 / 100 / 0———
Guatemala0.00%Small sample23.66% · N 7660 / 20 / 40 / 30 / 1——
Nicaragua0.00%Small sample215.94% · N 2070 / 20 / 01 / 4———
Ghana100.00%Small sample113.89% · N 361 / 1—0 / 4———
Venezuela0.00%Small sample115.87% · N 6870 / 10 / 04 / 4———
El SalvadorNot calculable03.75% · N 1,0670 / 00 / 74 / 110 / 1——
ColombiaNot calculable04.99% · N 3610 / 0—0 / 5———
PeruNot calculable06.82% · N 6010 / 00 / 40 / 1———
EcuadorNot calculable08.47% · N 590 / 0—0 / 0———
HondurasNo stored cell for this period—6.53% · N 1,148—0 / 45 / 50 / 0——
TurkiyeNo stored cell for this period—42.22% · N 45——3 / 3———
IranNo stored cell for this period—40.00% · N 5——2 / 2———
VietnamNo stored cell for this period—27.27% · N 22——2 / 2———
BangladeshNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1—1 / 1————
CubaNo stored cell for this period—28.26% · N 46—0 / 1————
EgyptNo stored cell for this period—30.43% · N 69——1 / 1———
EthiopiaNo stored cell for this period—64.71% · N 17—1 / 1————
BrazilNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 52—0 / 0————
CameroonNo stored cell for this period—41.03% · N 39——0 / 0———
ChinaNo stored cell for this period—57.14% · N 7———0 / 0——
GuineaNo stored cell for this period—46.67% · N 15——0 / 0———
HaitiNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 44———0 / 0——
IndiaNo stored cell for this period—17.95% · N 39———0 / 0——
MauritaniaNo stored cell for this period—8.11% · N 37——0 / 0———
NigeriaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2—0 / 0————
PakistanNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 17———0 / 0——
RomaniaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 25—0 / 00 / 0———
Stewart
Mexico0.00%Small sample20.00% · N 760 / 2————0 / 3
Honduras0.00%Small sample12.13% · N 470 / 10 / 0———0 / 3
Venezuela0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 420 / 1———0 / 00 / 1
NicaraguaNot calculable00.00% · N 180 / 0———1 / 3—
EcuadorNot calculable00.00% · N 20 / 0—————
GuatemalaNot calculable00.00% · N 590 / 0————0 / 2
HaitiNot calculable00.00% · N 240 / 0—————
RussiaNot calculable012.50% · N 80 / 0—————
UzbekistanNot calculable00.00% · N 10 / 0—————
BangladeshNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 4—————0 / 1
BoliviaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—————0 / 1
BrazilNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 5—————0 / 1
Czech RepublicNo stored cell for this period———————0 / 1
El SalvadorNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 21—————0 / 1
EritreaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1—————1 / 1
GuineaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2—————0 / 0
IndiaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 11—————0 / 1
JamaicaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 21—————0 / 1
VietnamNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—————0 / 1
LaSalle
Niger0.00%Small sample10.00% · N 10 / 1—————
HondurasNot calculable00.86% · N 1160 / 0—————
BangladeshNo stored cell for this period—15.38% · N 13—0 / 4————
ChinaNo stored cell for this period—7.02% · N 57—1 / 3————
CameroonNo stored cell for this period—28.13% · N 32—1 / 2————
AfghanistanNo stored cell for this period—50.00% · N 12—0 / 1————
AzerbaijanNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1—1 / 1————
Burkina FasoNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2—0 / 1————
EritreaNo stored cell for this period—16.67% · N 6—0 / 1————
PakistanNo stored cell for this period—28.57% · N 7—0 / 1————
UzbekistanNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 8—0 / 1————
IndiaNo stored cell for this period—3.57% · N 28—0 / 0————
KazakhstanNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1—0 / 0————
MexicoNo stored cell for this period—1.85% · N 54—0 / 0————
VietnamNo stored cell for this period—11.11% · N 9—0 / 0————
Oakdale
Venezuela0.00%Small sample17.69% · N 520 / 1———0 / 20 / 2
BrazilNot calculable00.00% · N 60 / 0————0 / 0
NicaraguaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 28————2 / 40 / 2
AzerbaijanNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1—1 / 2————
AfghanistanNo stored cell for this period—46.15% · N 13—1 / 1————
ChadNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2—0 / 1————
El SalvadorNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 21—0 / 0——0 / 10 / 0
EritreaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 3—0 / 1————
IndiaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 20—0 / 1———0 / 0
JordanNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 3—0 / 1————
PakistanNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 9—0 / 1————
RussiaNo stored cell for this period—61.54% · N 26—0 / 1————
SenegalNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 5————1 / 1—
Sri LankaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2—0 / 1————
TogoNo stored cell for this period—33.33% · N 3—0 / 1————
CubaNo stored cell for this period—7.14% · N 42—————0 / 1
Democratic Republic Of CongoNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—————0 / 1
EcuadorNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 13————0 / 00 / 0
GhanaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 5—————0 / 0
ItalyNo stored cell for this period——————0 / 0—
MexicoNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 53—0 / 0————
Los Fresnos · PEP
Iran0.00%Small sample142.11% · N 190 / 11 / 2————
BrazilNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1—0 / 4————
EgyptNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—0 / 3————
AfghanistanNo stored cell for this period—33.33% · N 6—0 / 2————
AngolaNo stored cell for this period—100.00% · N 1—0 / 2————
ChinaNo stored cell for this period—22.22% · N 9—1 / 2————
ColombiaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 6—0 / 2————
Democratic Republic Of CongoNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2—0 / 1————
EcuadorNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 4—0 / 1————
El SalvadorNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 5—0 / 1————
IraqNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1—0 / 1————
RussiaNo stored cell for this period—8.33% · N 12—0 / 1————
TogoNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 4—0 / 1————
HondurasNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 10—0 / 0————
IndiaNo stored cell for this period—6.25% · N 16—0 / 0————
Annandale · ANN
CameroonNot calculable035.29% · N 170 / 0—————
El SalvadorNo stored cell for this period—9.20% · N 598—0 / 5————
MauritaniaNo stored cell for this period—14.15% · N 106—0 / 3————
IranNo stored cell for this period—52.94% · N 17—0 / 2————
VenezuelaNo stored cell for this period—20.15% · N 268—0 / 2————
BangladeshNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 15—0 / 1————
Dominican RepublicNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 6—0 / 1————
EgyptNo stored cell for this period—32.43% · N 37—0 / 1————
GeorgiaNo stored cell for this period—80.00% · N 5—0 / 1————
GhanaNo stored cell for this period—42.86% · N 14—0 / 1————
JordanNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 8—0 / 1————
TurkiyeNo stored cell for this period—36.51% · N 63—0 / 1————
UzbekistanNo stored cell for this period—61.54% · N 13—0 / 1————
GuatemalaNo stored cell for this period—7.21% · N 402—0 / 0————
Atlanta - W. Peachtree Street
Fort Snelling
BangladeshNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—————1 / 1
CameroonNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 10—————3 / 3
CubaNo stored cell for this period—25.00% · N 24—————0 / 1
HondurasNo stored cell for this period—0.47% · N 215—————1 / 1
Boston · BOS
GuatemalaNo stored cell for this period—11.39% · N 158————0 / 20 / 1
BrazilNo stored cell for this period—9.17% · N 818————1 / 1—
El SalvadorNo stored cell for this period—7.32% · N 164—————0 / 0
KenyaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—————0 / 0
Buffalo
RussiaNo stored cell for this period—72.22% · N 18————1 / 1—
El SalvadorNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 8—0 / 0————
Chicago
MexicoNo stored cell for this period—5.01% · N 798————0 / 0—
Conroe
UkraineNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—0 / 1————
IndiaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 15—0 / 0————
TanzaniaNo stored cell for this period———0 / 0————
Elizabeth
El SalvadorNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 49—————0 / 1
Sierra LeoneNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 1—————0 / 0
Miami · KRO
New York - Federal Plaza
New York - Varick · NYV
El SalvadorNo stored cell for this period—1.27% · N 393——0 / 1———
HondurasNo stored cell for this period—0.92% · N 325———0 / 0——
Orlando
Philadelphia
RomaniaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—————0 / 1
Pearsall
IranNo stored cell for this period—42.11% · N 38—0 / 2————
NicaraguaNo stored cell for this period—2.27% · N 44—0 / 1————
CongoNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 3—0 / 0————
HondurasNo stored cell for this period—0.58% · N 173—0 / 0————
NigeriaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 6—0 / 0————
VietnamNo stored cell for this period—25.00% · N 4—0 / 0————
San Francisco · SFR
BelarusNo stored cell for this period—100.00% · N 1—0 / 6————
Annandale · WAS
El SalvadorNo stored cell for this period—7.69% · N 13——0 / 15 / 114 / 110 / 1
HondurasNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 2——0 / 52 / 80 / 1—
GuatemalaNo stored cell for this period—0.00% · N 7——0 / 24 / 45 / 5—
ChinaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0——1 / 12 / 22 / 2—
BoliviaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0——0 / 4—0 / 0—
EthiopiaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0——1 / 12 / 21 / 1—
BangladeshNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0——0 / 3—0 / 0—
EgyptNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0————3 / 3—
NigeriaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0———0 / 03 / 3—
EritreaNo stored cell for this period—————1 / 11 / 1—
IraqNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0——0 / 2———
NepalNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0————2 / 2—
NicaraguaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0——0 / 2—0 / 0—
AlbaniaNo stored cell for this period—————1 / 1——
CameroonNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0———1 / 1——
MauritaniaNo stored cell for this period————0 / 1———
MexicoNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0—0 / 00 / 00 / 00 / 1—
Sri LankaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0——1 / 1———
YemenNo stored cell for this period————0 / 1———
Former Countries (UR)No stored cell for this period——————0 / 0—
IndiaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0———0 / 0——
KazakhstanNo stored cell for this period—————0 / 0——
PeruNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0——0 / 0———
RussiaNo stored cell for this period—Not calculable · N 0———0 / 0——

Small sample: fewer than 100 grant or denial records. This share can swing widely. Each fiscal year shows grants / N; — means no stored cell. A zero denominator cannot give a share.

Judge means the code saved on the proceeding, not independently verified decision authorship. Flags are visual aids for mapped source categories; historical, unknown and non-geographic categories remain text-only.

EOIR CASE nationality aggregates · eoir-2026-09-case-v1 · Download complete counts

Hearing schedule

One proceeding record is not necessarily a separate hearing session.

Sterling · STE · All proceedings · 2026-10–2029-09

Asylum-associated records are a subset of All proceedings.

Schedule display range: 2026-10–2029-09 (36 months)

Same count scale for both hearing types. Browse horizontally to see all 36 months.

Proceedings

Master Calendar Hearings · 0 proceedings with recorded hearing dates

Individual / Merits Hearings

Months with no retained records show 0.

Monthly counts are available for all recorded courts below.

Annandale · ANN

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Baltimore · BAL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Fort Snelling · BLM

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Boston · BOS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Charlotte · CHL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Conroe · CIC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Elizabeth · ELZ

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Harlingen · HLG

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Hyattsville · HYA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

LaSalle · JNA

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Miami · KRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

New York - Federal Plaza · NYC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Oakdale · OAK

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Orlando · ORL

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Los Fresnos · PEP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Philadelphia · PHI

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Pearsall · PSD

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Stewart · SDC

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Sterling · STE

Monthly counts

George James Ward Jr. · GJW · Sterling · STE · 2026-10–2029-09 · All proceedings · Asylum-associated proceedings · Proceedings with recorded hearing dates · EOIR · 2026-09 edition
MonthAll proceedings · Master proceedingsAll proceedings · Individual proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Master proceedingsAsylum-associated proceedings · Individual proceedings
2026-10077060
2026-110000
2026-120000
2027-010000
2027-020000
2027-030000
2027-040000
2027-050000
2027-060000
2027-070000
2027-080000
2027-090000
2027-100000
2027-110000
2027-120000
2028-010000
2028-020000
2028-030000
2028-040000
2028-050000
2028-060000
2028-070000
2028-080000
2028-090000
2028-100000
2028-110000
2028-120000
2029-010000
2029-020000
2029-030000
2029-040000
2029-050000
2029-060000
2029-070000
2029-080000
2029-090000

Retained: 77Excluded: 7Unable to confirm: 4Source files and checks

Annandale · WAS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0Source files and checks

Dated result records

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Results for the current selection

Loading associated results…

These dates belong to proceedings associated with the recorded judge code. They do not establish when that person served or who made the application decision.

Monthly record distribution for this selection

Filtered records by court and fiscal year

All eight saved result categories · same filters as the result list
Historical record courtFiscal yearGrantedDeniedRecorded as abandonedRecorded as withdrawnRecorded as not adjudicatedRecorded as administratively closedOther recorded categoriesNo application result recordedTotal records

Each row totals its eight categories using the current filters. Fiscal years run from 10-01 through 09-30.

One row per eligible proceeding · latest completion date first
Proceeding completion dateHistorical record courtSaved application result

Counts use stored proceeding completion dates and judge codes. Later source releases may revise earlier records.

Source cutoff: 2026-09-30 · eoir-2026-09-case-v1 · Source files and checks

Recorded BIA appeals associated with this judge code · FY2026

These records are linked to proceedings carrying this EOIR judge code in the 2026-09 source snapshot. The data do not establish that the coded judge personally issued the decision under BIA review.

Decision FY2026 · respondent-filed appeals (A)

Denominator: respondent-filed BIA IJ Case Appeal events with an exact proceeding link and stored judge code, with a recorded disposition during the displayed period.

Respondent-filed recorded BIA appeal events · FY2026
Appeal events (denominator)DIS · recorded dismissal/affirmanceREM · remand as recordedSUS · appeal sustained as recordedOther · mixed recorded dispositions
3191021

Small sample: N is below 100. Counts remain visible; a few events can change the pattern substantially.

Questions about these records

Is this the judge’s asylum approval or denial rate?

It is the recorded grant share: of 233 asylum grant-or-denial records under judge code GJW at Charlotte in FY2026, 18 were grants (7.73%) and 215 were denials (92.27%).

Withdrawals, abandonment, administrative closure and other outcomes are outside this denominator. The judge code identifies the assigned judge; it does not prove who decided each application.

Why do other websites show a different number?

Publications count different things. This page counts asylum applications that ended in a grant or a denial in EOIR’s public CASE data, by fiscal year, at the court stored on each proceeding, and never pools courts.

Other reports may count other relief, such as withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture, count decisions rather than proceedings, combine courts or use other years. Compare the period, the population and N before comparing percentages.

Why are courts listed separately?

Each record keeps the court stored on its proceeding. This judge code has grant or denial records at 20 courts. They are shown separately and never pooled, and the official listing does not move older records to a new court.

What does a small sample mean here?

When fewer than 100 grant or denial records stand behind a share, one or two decisions can move it by several percentage points. Such figures are marked † or labeled as a small sample, and the 95% interval shows how wide the uncertainty is.

Where does this judge hear cases now?

EOIR’s official hearing directory, checked 2026-10-24, lists this name at Falls Church Immigration Adjudication Center.

Under this judge code, the 2026-09 EOIR edition records hearing dates from 2026-10 to 2029-09 at Sterling · STE: 0 master and 77 individual proceedings.

A listing or a scheduled date does not establish a sole duty station.

Can these numbers predict my case?

No. They describe past records under a judge code. The outcome of a case depends on its own facts, evidence and law. For advice about your case, talk to a qualified lawyer or accredited representative.

Data and sources

Source cutoff: · eoir-2026-09-case-v1

Dated asylum records and recorded grants or denials are available by court and fiscal year.

Result record coverage

5,953Associated proceeding records
1,890Proceedings linked to asylum applications
1,816Eligible dated asylum records
931Dated grant or denial records

All courts and all stored dates in this source edition. These coverage counts do not change with the result-list filters.

Historical record courts
22
Earliest recorded completion FY
FY2015
Latest recorded completion FY
FY2026
Why some source records are outside the dated results
  • 71 eligible asylum records have no completion date.
  • 136 eligible asylum records have no application result; 70 of them appear in the dated list. 66 records lack both a usable completion date and an application result. The missing-date and missing-result counts overlap.
  • 3 asylum-linked proceedings have conflicting saved application results.

A blank date or result does not establish a pending case, an undecided application, or the absence of a decision. Missing dates are not assigned to an assumed fiscal year.

All eligible dated result categories are included through the source cutoff, without aggregate suppression filters.

Source cutoff: 2026-09-30. FY2026 spans its complete fiscal-year calendar; reporting may be incomplete and later revised. Earlier stored dates do not prove service dates or decision authorship.

Nationality and representation selections do not filter this list. Case identifiers and personal attributes are not included.

Available historical coverage

Source coverage includes all normalized dated records for this identity. It is not verified decision authorship or a complete case history.

Coverage counting rules

Counts describe stored proceedings associated with the judge code, not unique cases, people, or verified decision authorship. Asylum applications are combined per proceeding using the same joins and conflict rules as the dated list.

1,887 asylum-linked proceedings meet the proceeding-type, case-link and result-consistency rules. These eligible records split into missing dates, invalid dates, dates after the cutoff, and dated records through the cutoff.

The dated list includes all saved result categories, including a blank result. Grant share uses only dated grants divided by dated grants plus denials; other categories are excluded.

These are saved results on proceedings assigned to the selected judge in EOIR data, not independently verified decision authorship. The application result has no separate decision timestamp. Completion dates may reflect a different event or later edits.

Each row represents one eligible proceeding after duplicate application rows are combined. Identical dates and results can appear multiple times. A person may have multiple proceedings. Within-day order does not indicate the sequence of decisions.

The public timeline includes all eight saved result categories and all stored completion years through the source cutoff. Conflicting application outcomes and inconsistent case joins remain excluded. Complete records can reconstruct counts hidden in legacy aggregate tables; those tables no longer provide a non-reconstruction guarantee.

Official court listing

Directory checked: EOIR hearing directory

On the checked official listing

An official listing may include supervisory or multiple-court assignments; it does not establish a sole duty station.

Hearing schedule sources

Schedule filtering and source checks

The 2026-09 EOIR edition is grouped using a source cutoff of 2026-09-30. Counts describe proceeding records with retained future hearing dates, grouped by the judge and court codes stored on each schedule record. Records with a handling reason and other excluded records are kept outside the counts; records that cannot be confirmed are listed separately. All proceedings includes the reliably identified asylum-associated subset.

Later recorded hearing dates are included in the source coverage summary.

All proceedings · future hearing dates through 2036-09-30

These source coverage counts include all proceedings and do not change with the proceedings filter above.

Annandale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
59
Other schedule types
4
Reliable asylum association
35
No identifiable asylum association
24

Baltimore

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
6
Other schedule types
3
No identifiable asylum association
6

Fort Snelling

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
4,127
Other schedule types
1,272
Reliable asylum association
2,081
No identifiable asylum association
2,046

Boston · BOS

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
523
Other schedule types
113
Reliable asylum association
182
No identifiable asylum association
341

Charlotte

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,585
Other schedule types
9
Reliable asylum association
1,389
No identifiable asylum association
196

Conroe

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
7
Reliable asylum association
4
No identifiable asylum association
3

Elizabeth

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
113
Other schedule types
34
Reliable asylum association
30
No identifiable asylum association
83

Harlingen

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
15
Reliable asylum association
15

Hyattsville

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
4
No identifiable asylum association
4

LaSalle

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
56
Reliable asylum association
50
No identifiable asylum association
6

Miami · KRO

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
26
Other schedule types
6
Reliable asylum association
6
No identifiable asylum association
20

New York - Federal Plaza

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,767
Reliable asylum association
1,161
No identifiable asylum association
606

Oakdale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
795
Other schedule types
426
Reliable asylum association
202
No identifiable asylum association
593

Orlando

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
3
Reliable asylum association
3

Los Fresnos · PEP

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
56
Reliable asylum association
52
No identifiable asylum association
4

Philadelphia

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
10
Reliable asylum association
9
No identifiable asylum association
1

Pearsall

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
460
Other schedule types
440
Reliable asylum association
11
No identifiable asylum association
449

Stewart

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
4,684
Other schedule types
1,039
Reliable asylum association
641
No identifiable asylum association
4,042
Unlinked asylum records
1

Sterling · STE

Retained: 77Excluded: 7Unable to confirm: 4

Raw Master and Individual records
88
Unconfirmed proportion
4.55%
Recorded handling reason
7
Multiple future records without a handling reason
4
Historical schedule records
5,005
Future schedule records
88
Other schedule types
1
Reliable asylum association
3,047
No identifiable asylum association
2,046

Annandale

Retained: 0Excluded: 0Unable to confirm: 0

Raw Master and Individual records
0
Unconfirmed proportion
Not calculable
Historical schedule records
1,301
Other schedule types
14
Reliable asylum association
918
No identifiable asylum association
383
View schedule counting rules
Source files, versions and checks

BIA appeal sources

BIA scope and counting rules

These counts describe the selected disposition period. DIS does not prove this judge was affirmed; REM is not an asylum grant; SUS is not a final asylum outcome.

Recorded BIA disposition patterns can change over time. These counts are not a permanent characteristic of this judge code. Changes may coincide with law, policy, administration, BIA composition, case mix or backlog; these descriptive data do not establish a cause.

All-party source coverage is separate from the respondent-filed table. National parent appeal events: 31,264 · Linked to a stored judge code: 31,252.

Respondent-filed source events: 29,285 · Linked to a stored judge code: 29,275 · Published respondent-filed events: 29,088 · Respondent-filed events with identity limitations: 187.

Judge code: GJW · Stored source field: saved IJ_CODE · Population: bia-decided-stored-judge-chronology-clean-1.

Disposition date basis: disposition_fy · Historical period: 2025-10-01–2026-09-30 · Source cutoff: 2026-09-30.

The stored code is an association in the snapshot, not proof of decision authorship or assignment when the original decision was issued. Today’s judge directory and court listing describe current context only.

Source versions and checks

Coverage and source versions are listed separately from publication, acquisition and later checks. A check does not extend the records beyond their cutoff.

EOIR public CASE data

Used on this page: Dated results, historical outcomes and saved hearing schedules

Historical result coverageFY2015–FY2026

Source edition2026-09

Source snapshot cutoff

The first and last available fiscal years bound this range; intervening years may have no records. Saved hearing dates and BIA disposition periods have separate coverage.

Fiscal years offered on web pagesFY2021–FY2026

Official source recheck ·

Source reachable at the last check; its contents have not been compared with this edition yet

Cite this page AsylumCompass. “Judge George James Ward Jr. · Charlotte Immigration Court asylum records.” https://asylumcompass.com/judge/george-james-ward-jr-gjw Include the source edition and period of the figure you cite.

Continue from this judge